Physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions

Physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions

The purpose of this research was to analyze the physical education and sport teachers’ perceptions about organizational democracy. The research group consisted of 191 physical education and sport teachers. The research data were collected by “The Organizational Democracy Scale”. In the analysis of data, descriptive statistics, Mann Whitney-U and Kruskall Wallis-H tests were used. According to the relevant findings, the physical education and sport teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions were positive in the sub-dimensions of participation-criticism, transparency, justice, equality and accountability but not high, the teachers’ organizational democracy perceptions did not significantly vary in gender, assigned school type, marital status and education background variables, in some sub-dimensions they significantly differed in assigned geographical region and seniority variables

___

  • 1. Acar G. Kaya M. Şahin. MY. School administrator’s ethical leadership behavior effects on physical education teachers organizational justice level. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 2012; 14(3): 51- 58.
  • 2. Akman N. Kamu yönetiminde hesap verebilirlik. necmiakman.blogspot.com.tr/2015/01/necmi-akman-giris20.html. 2015. Erişim Tarihi: 14.07.2017
  • 3. Argon T. Uylas SD. Yerlikaya S. Perceptions of teachers related accountability practices ın Turkish national education sistem and organizational cynicism. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2015; 7(2): 204-219.
  • 4. Ataç LO. Köse S. The relationship between organizational democracy and organizational dissent: A Research on white collar workers. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 2017; 46(1): 117-132.
  • 5. Avcı N. Eğitim yönetiminde hesap verilebilirlik. gencburokrat.com/kose-yazisi/40/egitim-yonetiminde-hesapverilebilirlik.html. 2015. Erişim Tarihi: 25.06.2017
  • 6. Bahadır Z. Certel Z. Investigation of organizational silence and organizational commitment of physical education teachers. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 2017; 7(1): 135-146.
  • 7. Bakan İ. Kara E. Güler B. The effects of organizational democracy perception on employees’ intrapreneurshıp performance: An empirical in hotel firms in Marmaris. HAK-İŞ Uluslararası Emek ve Toplum Dergisi, 2017; 6(14): 115-138.
  • 8. Başaran İE. Örgütsel davranış. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara, 1982.
  • 9. Benligiray S. İnsan kaynakları yönetimi. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, 2004.
  • 10. Bozkurt T. Çalışma ilişkilerinin evrimi. Beta Yayınları, İstanbul, 2011.
  • 11. Coşan PE. Gülova AA. Organizational democracy. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 2014; 21(2): 231-248.
  • 12. Crane A. Matten D. What is stakeholder democracy? Perspectives and issues, business ethics. A Europan Review, 2005; 14(1): 6-13.
  • 13. Çelik OT. The relationship between school managers’ and tteachers’ perception of organizational justice and job satisfaction. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Selçuk University Institute of Educational Sciences, Konya, 2012.
  • 14. Demirtaş Z. Alanoğlu M. The relationship between participation in decisionmaking of teachers and job satisfaction. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 2015; 16(2): 83-100.
  • 15. DiPaola MF. Tarter CJ. Hoy WK. Measuring organizational citizenship of schools: The OCB Scale. (Eds.: Hoy. W. and Miskel. C.). Educational Leadership and Reform, Greenwich, CN: Information Age Publishing, 2005; 319-341.
  • 16. Dive B. The accountable leader: Developing effective leadership through managerial accountability. Kogan Page Limited, London, 2008.
  • 17. Doğan A. The impact of organizational justice on organizational commitment in primary schools (The sample of Elaziğ province). Unpublished Master's Thesis, Fırat University. Institute of Social Sciences, Elazığ, 2008.
  • 18. Erkal PC. Research on organizational democracy with regards the public and private labour. Unpublshed doctoral thesis. Celal Bayar University, Institute of Social Sciences, Manisa, 2012.
  • 19. Ertürk E. The relationship between perception of organizational justice and teachers? Organizational commitment in primary and secondary schools. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Institute of Social Sciences, Burdur, 2011.
  • 20. Eryılmaz B. Biricikoğlu H. Accountability and ethics in public Administration. Turkish Journal of Business Ethics, 2011; 4(7): 19-45.
  • 21. Geçkil T. Tikici M. Örgütsel demokrasi ile örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları arasındaki ilişki. 22. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, 22-24 Mayıs 2014, Konya.
  • 22. Geçkil T. Tikici M. A study on developing the organizational democracy Scale. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 2015; 48(4): 41-78.
  • 23. Girgin S. Bayraktar HV. Study of perceived organizational justice of administrators by teachers. International Periodical for the Languages. Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 2017; 12(4): 217-238.
  • 24. Gömleksiz MN. Çetintaş S. Democratic attitudes of prospective teachers (Case of Fırat. Dicle. 7 Aralık. Cumhuriyet and Erzincan Universities). Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Facultiy of Education, 2011; 17: 1-14.
  • 25. Gözütok D. Öğretmenlerin demokratik tutumları. Türk Demokrasi Vakfı, Ankara, 1995.
  • 26. Güçlü N. Kılınç AÇ. İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin görüşlerine göre okul yöneticilerinin hesap verebilirlik düzeyleri. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 2011; 6(3): 2110-2122.
  • 27. Harrison JS. Freeman E. Special topic: Democracy in and around organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 2004; 18: 49-53.
  • 28. Johnson P. Whence democracy? A review and critique of the conceptual dimensions and implications of the business case for organizational democracy. Organization, 2006; 13(2): 245- 274.
  • 29. Kalman M. Gedikoğlu T. An investigation of the relationship between school administrators’ accountability and organizational justice. H. U. Journal of Education, 2014; 29(2): 115-128.
  • 30. Karadağ E. Baloğlu N. Yalçınkayalar P. A study on the relation between democratic attitudes of primary school administrators perceived by the teachers and democratic values of the teachers. Journal of Values Education, 2006; 4(12): 65-82.
  • 31. Karaevli Ö. Levent F. Investigation of effect of transparency in school administration on teachers who are in different career phases. Journal of Educational Sciences, 2014; 40: 89-108.
  • 32. Karaman P. Örgütsel adalet algısı ile tükenmişlik arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesine yönelik öğretmenler üzerinde bir uygulama. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek lisans Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, 2009.
  • 33. Kesen M. Investigating the effects of organizational democracy and organizational ıdentification on job satisfaction: A field study on retail ındustry. IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal, 2015; 6(19): 61-89.
  • 34. Kılıç Y. Demirtaş Z. The perceptıons of organızatıonal justıce of secondary teachers. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2014; 4(2): 46-58.
  • 35. Koçak E. Turan S. Aydoğdu E. Öğretmenlerin yetki devri. Otonomi ve hesap verebilirliklerine ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Education and Humanities: Teori ve Uygulama, 2012; 3(5): 117-148.
  • 36. Lansbury DR. Workplace democrarcy and the global financial crisis. Journal of Industrial Relations, 2009; 51: 1-22.
  • 37. Özan MB. Türkoğlu AZ. Şener G. The effect of democratic attitude and behaviors of school managers on the motivation of teachers. Fırat University Journal of Social Science, 2010; 20(1): 275-294.
  • 38. Özdemir A. The relationship of perceived superior support and ındividualism collectivism with organizational citizenship behaviors in primary schools. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 2010; 1(1): 93-112.
  • 39. Özdemir M. Eğitim örgütlerinde insan kaynakları yönetimi. Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2014.
  • 40. Özgan H. Bozbayındır F. Unfair applications and their effects in schools. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2011; 16: 66-85.
  • 41. Özpolat A. Bir toplumsal değişme paradigması olarak demokrasinin eğitime yansımaları: Demokratik eğitim. Millî Eğitim, 2010; 185: 365-381.
  • 42. Peker R. The assesment of the class teacher’s democratic attitudes and attitudes regarding childrens rights (Case Manisa). Yayımlanmamış Yüksek lisans Tezi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversity. Social Sciences Institute, Burdur, 2012.
  • 43. Sadykova G. Tutar H. A study on the relationship between organizational democracy and organizational dissent. The Journal of Business Science, 2014; 2(1): 1-16.
  • 44. Saraçoğlu SA. İlke E. Varol SR. A comparative research on the democratic attitudes of the teachers and the prospective teachers. EducationalSciences: Theory and Practice, 2004; 4(2): 356-364.
  • 45. Sarı M. Sadık F. Democracy perceptions of teacher candidates (Çukurova University sample). Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2001; 1(2): 67-82.
  • 46. Smith MP. Barriers to organizational democracy in public administration. Administration and Society, 2016; 8(3): 275- 317.
  • 47. Şeker G. Topsakal C. The level of ability to adopt and apply organizational democracy to primary schools according to perceptions of teachers and administrators. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 2011; 11(3): 1203-1227.
  • 48. Şengül R. Yazkan E. Yönetişim modeli olarak kalkınma ajansları. Küresel esintiler ve yerel etkiler sarmalında Türk kamu yönetimi. (Edt: A. Yılmaz ve Y. Bozkurt). Gazi Kitabevi. Ankara, 2007.
  • 49. Şişman M. Güleş H. Dönmez A. Qualifications framework for a democratic school culture. Uşak Üniversity Journal of Social Sciences, 2010; (3)1: 167-182.
  • 50. Taşçı D. Koç U. The relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors and organizational learning values: An ampirical research on academic personnel. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 2007; 7(2): 373-382.
  • 51. Titrek O. The level of organizational justice in schools according to school types. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 2009; 6(2): 551-573.
  • 52. Ulutaş M. Örgütsel demokrasi: Katılımcı yönetim. Nüve Kültür Merkezi Yayınları, Konya, 2011.
  • 53. Ünlü Y. Hamedoğlu MA. The relationship between perceived organizatinal justice and organizational silence level of teachers. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2015; 5(2): 140-157.
  • 54. Yazdani N. Organizational democracy and organizational structure link: Role of strategic leadership enviromental uncertainly. Research Journal of the Institute of Business Administration, 2010; 5(2): 51-73.
  • 55. Yıldırım F. The Relationship between organizational justice and lob Satisfaction. Ankara University the Journal of the Faculty of Political Sciences, 2007; 62(1). 253-278.