Özer YILDIZ, Mehmet KANLI, Hakan Salim ÇAĞLAYAN

Examination of Doping Usage Opinions of Bodybuilding Athletes in the Context of Sports Ethics

The aim of this research is to examine the thoughts of bodybuilding athletes on the use of doping from the perspective ofsports ethics. Interview method, one of the qualitative research patterns, was used in the research. The research group consistedof 14 elite bodybuilding athletes who participated in international competitions in the bodybuilding branch. In the study, thedata were obtained through face-to-face interviews method with bodybuilding athletes who volunteered to participate in theresearch in February 2018 and evaluated by the content analysis method. According to the survey, bodybuilding athletes ofTurkey's Youth and Sports Ministry in doping "zero tolerance" policy for their use depending on the doping of athletes of othercountries in views on the competitive environment in the contest; Unfair competition, no one who does not use abroad, seeingthis branch as a doping sport, getting rid of the backstage, power war of the states, health is more important than success; Intheir views on the relationship between the diplomatic power of the countries and the use of doping in internationalcompetitions, backstage power is important in success, making money negotiations, “Turkish athletes' work is very hard”themes; In his views on the use of doping with the thought that every way should be tried to win at all costs, health is moreimportant than anything, the themes of reaching the desired performance with patience, the truth of this sport, contrary tosports ethics, everything is necessary for victory; knowing that they were not able to detect that they used doping throughwipers before an important international competition, felt the necessity to take risks in their country and their own reputationfor one-time use of doping; the themes of the athletes they know and observe in their country and other foreign countries usingdoping, with themes such as a wide variety of health problems and negativity should not be connected to doping in their livesabout their physiological and physical changes; It is determined that the athletes they know and observe by using dopingbodybuilding in our country and other foreign countries express a wide variety of psychological problems and addictionthemes in their opinions about their psychological changes in their lives after the end of the competition life.

PDF

___

1. Akgün N. Egzersiz fizyolojisi. Ankara: Gökçe Ofset Matbaacılık, 1989.
2. Araman A. Dünyada dopingle mücadele eden kuruluşlar ve dopingin tarihçesi. 7. Uluslararası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi Kongre Kitabı, Spor Bilimleri Derneği, Kemer, Antalya, s. 349- 350, 2002.
3. Barkoukis V, Lazuras L, Tsorbatzoudis H, Beliefs about the causes of success in sports and susceptibility for doping use in adolescent athletes. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2014; 32(3), 212-219.
4. Baysaling Ö. Sporda her yönüyle doping. İstanbul: Pres Basım ve Yayın, 2000.
5. Beltz SD, Doering PL. Efficacy of nutritional supplements used by athletes. Clinical Pharmacy, 1993; 12 (12), 900-908.
6. Berglund B, Hemmingsson P, Birgegard G. Detection of autologous blood transfusions in cross-country skiers. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 1987; 8(2), 66-70.
7. MY. Measurement of male bodybuilding athletes, who use doping, their burnout situation after competation. İÜ Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2016; 6 (3), 29-37.
8. Bloodworth A, McNamee M. Clean olympians? Doping and anti-doping: The views of talented young British athletes. International Journal of Drug Policy, 2010; 21, 276-282.
9. Dallı M, Işıkdemir E, Bingöl E. Determination of doping knowledge level of physical education and sports college students. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 2014; 2 (6), 11-20.
10. Deligiannis AP, Kouidi EI. Cardiovascular adverse effects of doping in sports. Hellenic Journal of Cardiology, 2012; 53(6), 447-457.
11. Dinçer N. Elit sporcuların doping hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya, 2010.
12. Erdemli A. Spor felsefesi. İstanbul: Özener Matbaası E Yayınları, 2002.
13. Eröz MF. Milli düzeyde, atletizm, güreş, judo ve halter yapan sporcuların doping ve ergojenik yardım hakkındaki görüşlerinin ve bilgi düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kütahya, 2007.
14. Gençtürk G, Çolakoğlu T, Demirel M. A Research for determine the intelligence level of national sportsman for doping (Wrestling Sample). Niğde University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2009; 3(3), 213-221.
15. Günay M, Cicioğlu İ. Spor fizyolojisi. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi, 2001.
16. Kuçuradi İ. Etik. Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu Yayını, 1996.
17. Kurtipek S, Çelik OB, Yılmaz B, Yenel İF. Determination of the thoughts of national team athletes on the concept of doping: A study of metaphor analysis. Niğde University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 2016; 10(2), 318-327.
18. Laure P, Thouvenin F, Lecerf T. Attitudes of coaches toward doping. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2001; 41(1), 132-136.
19. Melzer M, Elbe AM, Brand R. Moral and ethical decisionmaking: A chance for doping prevention in sports?. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 2010; 4 (1), 69-85.
20. Önen ME. Sporda doping. İstanbul: Akademi Basım ve Yayıncılık, 2014.
21. Punch KF. Sosyal araştırmalara giriş. (Çev. D Bayrak, HB Arslan ve Z Akyüz), Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi, 2005.
22. Simson V, Andrew J. Olimpiyatlar, sahtekârlık ve mafya, güç, para ve doping. (Çev. M Harmancı), İstanbul: Milliyet Yayınları, 1994.
23. Sobal J, Marquart LF. Vitamine/mineral supplement use among high school athletes. Adolescence, 1994; 29 (116), 835- 843.
24. Solberg HA, Hanstad DV, Thoring TA. Doping in elite sportdo the fans care? Public opinion on the consequences of doping scandals. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 2010; 11 (3), 185-199.
25. Şapçı HA. Üniversiteler arası spor müsabakalarına katılan öğrencilerin doping kullanımına yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2010.
26. Şenel Ö, Güler D, Kaya İ, Ersoy A, Kürkçü R. Farklı ferdi branşlardaki üst düzey Türk sporcuların ergojenik yardımcılara yönelik bilgi ve yararlanma düzeyleri. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2004; 2(2), 41-47.
27. Tarakçıoğlu S. Spor etiği bağlamında gen dopingi. Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir, 2012.
28. Tavşancıl E, Aslan E. İçerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayıncılık, 2001.
29. Turkcapar U, Koc M, Koc M. Analyzing the attitudes of elite wrestlers related to the use of doping. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 2014; 16(1), 128-134.
30. Turkcephe G, Kumartasli M, Mamak H. A research on information levels of weightlifters participated in Turkey youth championship about doping and on their doping utilization frequency. International Journal of Academic Research, 2013; 5 (6), 17-22.
31. Wanjek B, Rosendahl J, Strauss B, Gabriel HH. Doping, drugs and drug abuse among adolescents in the state of Thuringia (Germany): prevalence, knowledge and attitudes. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007; 28(4), 346- 353.
32. Williams MH. Ergogenic and ergolytic substances. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 1992; 24 (9), 344-348.
33. Yalnız İ, Gündüz N. Ankara ilinde vücut geliştirme branşında faaliyet gösteren sporcuların ergojenik yardımcılar konusunda bilgi ve uygulama düzeyleri. Gazi Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2004; 9 (2), 21-23.
34. Yarasheski KE, Campbell JA, Smith K, Rennie MJ, Holloszy JO, Bier DM, 1992. Effect of growth hormone and resistance exercise on muscle growth in young men. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 262, 3: 261- 267.
35. Yıldırım Ş. Doping ve ergojenik yardımlar ile doping kullanmanın sıklığı hakkında bilgi ağırlık düzeylerinin araştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sivas, 2008.
36. Yıldırım A, Şimşek H. Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2006.
37. Yıldız A. Cumhuriyet üniversitesi beden eğitimi ve spor yüksekokulu ve Sivas ili amatör liglerinde değişik branşlardaki sporcuların doping kullanım oranlarının araştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sivas, 2006.
38. Yıldız M, Pala A, Biner M, Göral Ş. Bireysel ve takım sporları ile ilgilenen sporcuların doping hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Hakemli Ortopedi Travmatoloji ve Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, 2016; 6, 1-12.