Effect Of The Level Of Participation In Sportive Activities On Trust In Teachers And Identification Level With School

The study was performed out to examine the effect of high school students' level of participation in sports activities onteacher confidence and identification with school. The research group consists of a total of 302 students, 211 males and 91females studying in different types of high schools in Şanlıurfa during the 2018-2019 academic years. In order to gain data forthe purpose of the study, “Identification with School Scale” and “Teacher Trust Scale” were used. The students participating inthe study were asked personal information questions regarding their demographic characteristics. Skewness and kurtosis testswere examined to test the normality of data distribution. The study was carried out in SPSS 22 statistical package program andthe degree of significance was taken as 0.05. Independent Sample T (Independent Sample) test was used in binary comparisons,One-Way Variance Analysis (OneWayAnova) was used in multiple comparisons, and the correlation (Pearson) test was used todetermine the relationship between variables. According to the responses given by the students who participated in the study,there was a significant difference between the groups in terms of facility adequacy in the school, the efficiency of the sportsactivities and the type of school, for the level of the students' confidence in the teacher and their identification with the school,but there was a significant difference between the groups in terms of their identification with the students. According to theresults of the correlation analysis, a positive correlation was found between the students' confidence levels and theiridentification with the school. Finally, according to the regression results obtained, it was determined that the adequacy of theclub activities and facilities in the school had a positive effect on the students' identification with the school and theirconfidence in the teacher

PDF

___

1. Adams C. Social determinates of student trust in highpoverty elementary schools. In: Analyzing school contexts, WK. Hoy and MF. DiPaola eds. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing Inc, 2010; 255-280.
2. Alıcı D. Development of attitude scale towards school: Reliability and validity study. Education and Science Journal. 2013; 38(168): 318-331.
3. Anderman LH. Academic and social perceptions as predictors of change in middle school students' sense of school belonging. The Journal of Experimental Education. 2003; 72(1): 5-22.
4. Aşlamacı İ. Religious culture and moral knowledge teacher candidates' views on teaching practice lesson (Inonu University Sample). International Social Researches Journal. 2016; 9-43.
5. Bölükbaşı B. Family environment, Effect of self-respect perception and school attitude in the academic success of 9th grade students. Unpublished Master Thesis, Bogazici University, Social Sciences Institute. İstanbul. 2005.
6. Cebeci S. Tendencies and reasons of Imam-hatip high school graduates. Religion Education and Training in Turkey. 1993; 109-115.
7. Cheng ST. Chan AC. The development of a brief measure of school attitude. Educational and Psychological Measurement.2003; 63(6): 1060-1070.
8. Çalık E. Examination of primary school students’ optimism levels and perceptions related to school. Unpublished master thesis, Ankara University, Education Sciences Institute. Ankara.2008.
9. Demirtaş H. Basics of Classroom Management. H. Kıran (Ed.), Inside the Classroom management. Anı Publishing. Ankara. 2012; 8: 1-34.
10. Doğan A. Developments in imam-hatip high schools after 1997 (Adana Sample). Unpublished Master Thesis, Cukurova University. Social Sciences Institute. Adana. 2006.
11. Dündar N. Identification with School Levels and Trust in Teacher Perceptions of Secondary Grade Students. Master Thesis, Inonu University. Malatya. 2018.
12. Finn JD. Withdrawing from school. Review of educational research.1989; 59(2):117-142.
13. Finn JD. Voelkl KE. School characteristics related to student engagement. The Journal of Negro Education.1993; 62(3): 249- 268.
14. Fletcher JM. Is identification with school the key component in the ‘Black Box’ of education outcomes? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Economics of Education Review. 2009; 28:662–671.
15. Gedik A. School alienation in the context of school life quality in secondary school students. Unpublished Master Thesis, Inonu University. Malatya. 2014.
16. Jackson JH. School bonding in adolescence: a developmentalcontextual examination of risk and protective factors. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Boston College Lynch Graduate School of Education. Boston. 2007.
17. King SD. Trust and shared governance: a qualitative approach at the middle school level. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University. Milwaukee-Wisconsin. 1996.
18. Küçük V. Koç H. The relationship between human and sport in the process of psycho-social development. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Sciences. 2004; 9(1): 211-223.
19. Leithwood K. Jantzi D. The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration. 2000; 38(2): 112-129.
20. Libbey HP. Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness and engagement. Journal of School Health. 2004;74(7): 274-283.
21. Ma X. Sense of belonging to school: Can schools make a difference? The Journal of Educational Research. 2003; 96(6): 340-349.
22. McCoach DB. A validation study of the school attitude assessment survey. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2002; 35(2): 66-77.
23. McCoach DB. Siegle D. The school attitude assessment survey-revised: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2003; 63(3): 414-429.
24. Mengi S. The relationship between the social support and self-efficacy levels of the high school education students in the 10th and 11th grade with their commitment to the school, Unpublished Master Thesis, Sakarya University. Sakarya. 2011.
25. Mok MMC. Determinants of students' quality of school life: A path model. Learning Environments research. 2002; 5(3): 275- 300.
26. Ogbu JU. Simons HD. Voluntary and involuntary minorities: a cultural ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly.1998; 29(2): 155-188.
27. Özer N. Dündar N. Adaptation of school identification scale. Unpublished research report. Inonu University. Malatya. 2015.
28. Özer N. Tül C. Examination of psychometric properties of Turkish form of teacher trust scale for students. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 2014; 10(1).
29. Perry JC. Liu X. Pabian Y. School engagement as a mediator of academic performance among urban youth: The role of career preparation, parental career support, and teacher support. The Counseling Psychologist. 2010; 38(2): 269-295.
30. Sarı M. The sense of belonging to school in high school students. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences. 2013; 13(1): 147-160.
31. Shao AT. Marketing Research: An Aid to Decision Making, Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western/Thomson Learning, 2002.
32. Steele CM. Race and the schooling of black Americans. The Atlantic Monthly.1992; 269(4): 68-78.
33. Tschannen-Moran M. Hoy WK. A multi-disciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research. 2000; 70(4): 547- 593.
34. TürkmenGül E. Expectations and problems of imam-hatip high school students. Master Thesis, Uludağ University, Institute of Social Sciences. Bursa. 1998.
35. Ünal H. Çukur CŞ. The commitment to school, discipline techniques applied in school and the effect of victimization on school's abnormal behaviors of high school students. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice: Theory & Practice. 2011; 11(2): 547-570.
36. Ünlü Y. Expectations and problems of imam-hatip high school students. Unpublished Master Thesis, Uludağ University, Institute of Social Sciences. Bursa. 1999.
37. Voelkl KE. Identification with school. American Journal of Education. 1997; 105(3): 294-318.