The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study

Öz Bullying is a common problem in today’s schools. Bullying affects not only victims and bullies but also the other students who witness the bullying. The purpose of this research is to examine the behaviors shown by high school students who have witnessed bullying and the processes that have led them to these behaviors. By with this purpose, the research benefits from grounded theory design. In-depth interviews have been performed with 36 people who voluntarily participated in the research. The qualitative findings of the research show the witness experience of bullying to be a complex process. As a result of the research, firstly school counselors need to do awareness studies on bullying. Because it is seen that students' definitions of bullying are limited to physical bullying. Secondly, situational conditions seem to change the behavior of individuals who witness bullying. Therefore studies will need to be done directed at school administrators’, teachers’, and school psychologists’ development of positive class climates and formation of anti-bullying norms, as well as at increasing peer relations. Thirdly, this study has demonstrated the importance of cognitive empathy. Cognitive empathy should be added to anti-bullying programs. Research has shown that bullying should be handled as a system that includes teachers, victims, bullies, witnesses, and parents.


Cappadocia, M. C., Pepler, D., Cummings, J. G., & Craig, W. (2012). Individual motivations and characteristics associated with bystander intervention during bullying episodes among children and youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27 (3), 201-216.

Chen, L. M., Chang, L. Y., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2016). Choosing to be a defender or an outsider in a school bullying incident: Determining factors and the defending process. School psychology international, 37(3), 289-302.

Clark, K.N., Dorio, N.B., Demaray, M.K. et al. (2019). Understanding bullying, victimization, and bystander behaviors through resource control theory. Child Youth Care Forum

Coloroso, B. (2005). A bully’s bystanders are never innocent. The Education Digest, 70 (8),49-51.

Coloroso, B. (2011). Bully, bullied, bystander... and beyond. The Education Digest, 77 (4),36-39.

Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13 (1), 3-21.

Correia, I., & Dalbert, C. (2008). School bullying: Belief in a personal just world of bullies, victims, and defenders. European Psychologist, 13(4), 248-254.

Correia, I., Kamble, S.V. & Dalbert, C. (2009) Belief in a just world and well-being of bullies, victims and defenders: a study with Portuguese and Indian students. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping: An International Journal, 22 (5), 497-508.

Craig, W.M., Pepler, D.J., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21(1), 22- 36.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th edition). Pearson.

Çınkır, Ş. ve Kepenekçi, Y. K. (2003). Öğrenciler arası zorbalık. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 34(34), 236-253.

Demaray, M. K., Summers, K.H., Jenkins, L.N. & Becker, L.D. (2016) Bullying articipant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ): Establishing a reliable and valid measure, Journal of School Violence, 15 (2), 158-188,

Dwyer, K. K., Bingham, S. G., Carlson, R. E., Prisbell, M., Cruz, A. M., & Fus, D. A. (2004). Communication and connectedness in the classroom: Development of the Connected Classroom Climate Invent Communication Research Reports, 21(3), 264-272.

Elliot, M. (2002). Bullying: A practical guide to coping for schools. (3rd edition). Trans-Atlantic Publications.

Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2010). Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. Journal of school psychology, 48(6), 533-553.

Ergül, A. (2009). Bir grup süreci olarak akran zorbalığı: Katılımcı rolü gruplarında tepkisel amaçlı saldırganlık ve toplumsal konum. (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Forbes, H., Stark, A. M., Hopkins, S. W., & Fireman, G. D. (2020). The effects of group membership on college students’ social exclusion of peers and bystander behavior. The Journal of psychology, 154(1), 15-37.

Forsberg, C., Thornberg, R., & Samuelsson, M. (2014). Bystanders to bullying: fourth- to seventh-grade students’ perspectives on their reactions. Research Papers in Education, 29(5), 557-576.

Forsberg, C., Wood, L., Smith, J., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Jungert, T. & Thornberg, R. (2016). Students’ views of factors affecting their bystander behaviors in response to school bullying: a cross-collaborative conceptual qualitative analysis, Research Papers in Education, doi: 10.1080/02671522.2016.1271001.

Freedman, J. L., Sears, D.O. & Carlsmith, J.M. (1998). Sosyal psikoloji. (A. Dönmez, çev.). (3. Baskı). İmge Kitabevi.

González‐Cabrera, J., Sánchez‐Álvarez, N., Calvete, E., León‐Mejía, A., Orue, I., & Machimbarrena, J. M. (2020). Psychometric properties of the triangulated version of the European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire: Prevalence across seven roles. Psychology in the Schools, 57(1), 78-90.

Goulding, C. (2001). Grounded theory: a magical formula or a potential nightmare. The Marketing Review, 2(1), 21-33.

Hamby, S., Weber, M. C., Grych, J., & Banyard, V. (2015). What difference do bystanders make? The association of bystander ınvolvement with victim outcomes in a community sample. Psychology of Violence, 6 (1), 91-102.

Hays, D. G., Wood, C., Dahl, H., & Kirk‐Jenkins, A. (2016). Methodological rigor in Journal of Counseling & Development qualitative research articles: A 15‐ year review. Journal of Counseling & Development, 94(2), 172-183.

Howitt, D. (2010). Introduction to qualitative methods in psychology. Prentice Hall.

Jenkins, L. N., & Fredrick, S. S. (2017). Social capital and bystander behavior in bullying: internalizing problems as a barrier to prosocial intervention. Journal of youth and adolescence, 46(4), 757-771.

Jenkins, L. N., & Nickerson, A. B. (2017). Bystander intervention in bullying: role of social skills and gender. The Journal of Early Adolescence,

Lamb, L. J., Hudson, C. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2017). Does defending come with a cost? Examining the psychosocial correlates of defending behaviour among bystanders of bullying in a Canadian sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 65: 112-123.

Lodge, J., & Frydenberg, E. (2005). The role of peer bystanders in school bullying: Positive steps toward promoting peaceful schools. Theory into practice, 44(4), 329-336.

López-Pérez, B., Hanoch, Y., Holt, K., & Gummerum, M. (2017). Cognitive and affective empathy, personal belief in a just world, and bullying among offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 2591-2604.

McLaughlin, C., Arnold, R., & Boyd, E. (2005). Bystanders in schools: What do they do and what do they think? factors ınfluencing the behaviour of english students as bystanders, Pastoral Care in Education, 23 (2), 17-22.

Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61-72.

Oh, I., & Hazler, R. J. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders'reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30(3), 291-310.

Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham, (Eds). Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized. (pp. 3-20). The Guilford Press.

Olweus D. (1994) Bullying at School. In L.R. Huesmann (Ed.) Aggressive Behavior: The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology. Springer.

Paciello, M., Fida, R., Cerniglia, L., Tramontano, C., & Cole, E. (2013). High cost helping scenario: The role of empathy, prosocial reasoning and moral disengagement on helping behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(1), 3-7.

Perdew, L. (2015). Bullying: esential issues. Abdo Publishing.

Piliavin, I. M., Piliavin, J. A., & Rodin, J. (1975). Costs, diffusion, and the stigmatized victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (3), 429-438.

Pişkin, M. (2002). Okul zorbalığı: Tanımı, türleri, ilişkili olduğu faktörler ve alınabilecek önlemler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 2 (2), 531- 562.

Pronk, J., Olthof, T., Aleva, E. A., van der Meulen, M., Vermande, M. M., & Goossens, F.A. (2020). Longitudinal associations between adolescents' bullying‐related indirect defending, outsider behavior, and peer‐group status. Journal of research on adolescence, 30, 87-99.

Pozzoli, T. (2010). School bullyng: defending the victim or looking the other way? The role of personal correlates and class norms in primary and middleschool. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dipartimento di Psicologia delloSviluppo e della Socializzazione Universita degli Studi di Padova, Padova.

Pozzoli, T. & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior inbullying: the role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal Abnormal Child Psycholgy, 38: 815–827.

Pozzoli, T. & Gini, G. (2013). Friend similarity in attitudes toward bullying andsense of responsibility to intervene, Social Influence, 8:2-3, 161-176.

Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Thornberg, R. (2017). Getting angry matters: Going beyond perspective taking and empathic concern to understand bystanders' behavior in bullying. Journal of adolescence, 61: 87-95.

Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Vieno, A. (2012). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: A multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83(6), 1917-1931.

Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). What does it take to stand up forthe victim of bullying?: The interplay between personal and socialfactors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56 (2), 143-163.

Raskauskas, J. L., Gregory, J., Harvey, S. T., Rifshana, F., & Evans, I. M. (2010).Bullying among primary school children in New Zealand: Relationships with prosocial behaviour and classroom climate. Educational Research, 52(1), 1-13.

Rigby, K. (2007). Bullying in schools: And what to do about it. Acer Press.

Rigby, K. (2003). Stop the bullying: a handbook for schools. Aust CouncilFor Editional Research.

Rigby, K. & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied, Educational Psychology, 26 (3), 425-440.

Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2005). Student bystanders in Australian schools. Pastoral Care in Education, 23 (2), 10-16.

Rigby, K. & Slee, P.T. (1991) Bullying among Australian school children: reported Behavior and attitudes toward victims, The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(5), 615-627.

Ross, S. W., Lund, E. M., Sabey, C., & Charlton, C. (2017). Students’ perspectives on bullying. In L. H. Rosen, K. DeOrnellas & S. R. Scott (Ed.). Bullying in School Perspectives from School Staff , Students, and Parents (pp. 23-47). Palgrave Macmillan.

Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of adolescence, 22(4), 453-459.

Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status with the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22: 1-15.<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T

Sokol, N., Bussey, K., & Rapee, R. M. (2015). The effect of victims' responses to overt bullying on same-sex peer bystander reactions. Journal of school psychology, 53(5), 375-391.

Song, J. & On, I. (2018). Factors influencing bystanders' behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78:273- 282.

Starks, H., & Brown Trinidad, S. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative health research, 17(10), 1372-1380.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. (2nd ed.). Sage.

Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537.

Tapper, K. ve Boulton, M. J. (2005). Victim and peer group responses to different forms of aggression among primary school children. Aggressive Behavior, 31: 238-253.

Thornberg, R. (2017). School bullying and fitting into the peer landspace: a grounded field study. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39 (1), 144- 158.

Thornberg, R. & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy, Journal of Adolescence, 36 (3), 475-483.

Thornberg, R., Landgren, L., & Wiman, E. (2018). ‘It Depends’: A qualitative study on how adolescent students explain bystander intervention and non- intervention in bullying situations. School Psychology International, 0143034318779225.

Thornberg, R., Tenenbaum, L., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Jungert, T., & Vanegas, G. (2012). Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not to intervene?. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(3), 247-252.

Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2017). Classroom relationship qualities and social-cognitive correlates of defending and passive bystanding in school bullying in Sweden: A multilevel analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 63, 49-62.

Trach, J., & Hymel, S. (2020). Bystanders’ affect toward bully and victim as predictors of helping and non‐helping behaviour. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 61(1), 30-37.

Wachs, S., Görzig, A., Wright, M. F., Schubarth, W., & Bilz, L. (2020). Associations among adolescents’ relationships with parents, peers, and teachers, self- efficacy, and willingness to intervene in bullying: a social cognitive approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 420.

Wang, S. (2020). Standing up or standing by: Bystander intervention in cyberbullying on social media. New Media & Society, 1461444820902541.

White, L., Hammonds, F., & Valkyrie, K. T. (2014). Bullying: Bullies, victims, and witnesses. Modern Psychological Studies, 20(1), 1-14.

Williford, A., Boulton, A. J., Forrest-Bank, S. S., Bender, K. A., Dieterich, W. A., & Jenson, J. M. (2016). The effect of bullying and victimization on cognitive empathy development during the transition to middle school. Child & Youth Care Forum, 45, 525-541.

Xie, H., & Ngai, S. S. Y. (2020). Participant roles of peer bystanders in school bullying situations: evidence from Wuhan, China. Children and Youth Services Review, 110: 104762.

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { tpdrd905972, journal = {Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi}, issn = {1302-1370}, eissn = {1302-1370}, address = {}, publisher = {Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Derneği}, year = {2021}, volume = {11}, pages = {37 - 48}, doi = {}, title = {The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study}, key = {cite}, author = {Ekşi, Halil and Türk-kurtça, Tuğba} }
APA Ekşi, H , Türk-kurtça, T . (2021). The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study . Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi , 11 (60) , 37-48 . Retrieved from
MLA Ekşi, H , Türk-kurtça, T . "The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study" . Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi 11 (2021 ): 37-48 <>
Chicago Ekşi, H , Türk-kurtça, T . "The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study". Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi 11 (2021 ): 37-48
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study AU - Halil Ekşi , Tuğba Türk-kurtça Y1 - 2021 PY - 2021 N1 - DO - T2 - Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 37 EP - 48 VL - 11 IS - 60 SN - 1302-1370-1302-1370 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study %A Halil Ekşi , Tuğba Türk-kurtça %T The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study %D 2021 %J Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi %P 1302-1370-1302-1370 %V 11 %N 60 %R %U
ISNAD Ekşi, Halil , Türk-kurtça, Tuğba . "The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study". Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi 11 / 60 (Mart 2021): 37-48 .
AMA Ekşi H , Türk-kurtça T . The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi. 2021; 11(60): 37-48.
Vancouver Ekşi H , Türk-kurtça T . The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi. 2021; 11(60): 37-48.
IEEE H. Ekşi ve T. Türk-kurtça , "The Witness Experiences of Bullying in High School Students: A Qualitative Study", Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, c. 11, sayı. 60, ss. 37-48, Mar. 2021

20656 13874