Çocuk ürolojisi minimal cerrahi girişimlerinde oral ve rektal midazolam

Çocuklarda sedasyon eşliğinde minimal cerrahi girişimler daha rahat yapılabilir. Bu amaçla kısa etki süreli değişik yollardan uygulanabilen, bunun yanı sıra cerrahi sonrası amnezi oluşturabilen midazolam en çok tercih edilen ilaçlardandır. Midazolam, bilinçli sedasyonda oral, rektal ve intravenöz, intramüsküler, intranazal gibi yollardan uygulanır. Oral ve rektal uygulamada sedasyon kalitesi, amnezi etkinliği postoperatif davranış bozukluklarına etkisinde bir farklılık olup olmadığını, SpO2 ve vital bulgular üzerindeki etkilerini araştırmak amacıyla çift kör olarak planlanan bu çalışmada rasgele seçilen ASA-I sınıf, yaşları 3-12 yıl arasındaki çocuklardan oral, rektal ve kontrol grubu olmak üzere 15'er olguluk üç grup oluşturuldu. Oral ve rektal gruba 0.5 mg/kg midazolam uygulandı. Kontrol grubuna ise 10-15 mL oral meyve suyu verildi. Sedasyon açısından kontrol grubu, oral ve rektal midazolam uygulanan gruplardan istatistiksel olarak farklıydı (p

The use of oral and rectal midazolam in minor uro-pediatric surgical procedures

For minor surgical procedures in pediatric patients, sedation can be sufficient instead of general anaesthesia. Midazolam can be use for sedation as it has a short-effect period with postoperative amnesia and can be administrated from different routes as intravenously, intramuscularly, rectally, perorally and intranasally. This double-blind study was designed to compare the quality of sedative effects, the effects on postoperative behavior abnormalities and the effects on SpO2 and vital signs of oral versus rectal midazolam administrations in minor surgical procedures. All patients were between 3-12 years old and ASA-I class. Patients were randomized in 3 equal group (control, oral and rectal, n:15). Midazolam was administered perorally and rectally 0.5 mg/kg. Control group received 10-15 mL fruit juice orally. Regarding the sedation levels there was no difference between oral and rectal groups while significant difference was found between control and study groups. A quick respond to drug effect and postoperative amnesia was obtained in the rectal group then the oral group. The rectal administration was well tolerated then the peroral route. We concluded that, the rectally administration of midazolam could be preferred in pediatric minor surgical procedures.

___

  • 1. Shane SA, Fuchs SM, Khine H: Efficacy of rectal midazolam for the sedation of preschool children undergoing laceration repair. Ann Emer Med, 1994; 24:1065.
  • 2. Miller RD: Anaesthesia. 4th Ed., Churchill Livingston NY, 1994, p:248.
  • 3. McMillan CO, Spahr-Scohopfer IA, Sıkıch N, Hartiey E, Lerman J: Premedication of children with oral midazolam. Can J Anaesthesiol 1992; 39:545-50.
  • 4. Twersky RS, Hartung J, Berger BJ, McClain J, Beaton C: Midazolam enhances anterograde but not retrograde amnesia in pediatric patients. Anesthesiology 1995; 78:51.
  • 5. Payne KA, Coetzee AR, Mattheyse FJ: Behavioural changes in children following minor surgery - is premedication beneficial? Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1992; 43:173.
  • 6. Özcengiz D, Özbek H: Anestezi El Kitabı. Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri, 1998, s:132.
  • 7. Liacouras CA, Mascarenhas M, Poon C, Wenner WJ: Placebo-controlled trial assessing the use of oral midazolam as a premedication to conscious sedation for pediatric endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47:455.
  • 8. Raybould D, Bradshaw EG: Premedication for day case surgery: A study of oral midazolam. Anaesthesia 1987; 42:591.
  • 9. Anderson BJ, Exarcos H, Lee K, Brown TC: Oral premedication in childreen: a comparison of chloral hydrate, diazepam, alprozolam, midazolam and placebo for day surgery. Anesth Intens Care 1990; 18:185-93.
  • 10. Roelofse JA, van der Bijl P: Comparison of rectal midazolam and diazepam for premedication in pediatric dental patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51:525-29.
  • 11. Giacalone VF: Antianxiety/sedative drugs. The benzodiazepines. Clin Pediatr Med Surg 1992; 9:465-79.
  • 12. Loeffler PM: Oral benzodiazepines and conscious sedation: a review. J Oral Maksillofac Surg 1992; 50:989-97.
  • 13. Tolksdorf W, Eick C, Amberger M: Premedication in pre-school children with oral, rectal, and nasal midazolam. Anaesth Analg 1992; 75:880.
  • 14. Kraus GB, Gruber RG, Knoll R, et al: Pharmacokinetic studies following intravenous and rectal administration of midazolam in children. Anaesthetist 1989; 38:658-63.
  • 15. Payne K, Mattheyse FJ, Liebenberg D, et al: The pharmacokinetics of midazolam in pediatric patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 37:267-72.
  • 16. Malinovsky JM, Lecus C, Servin F et al: Plasma concentrations of midazolam after I.V. nasal or rectal administration in children. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 617-20.
  • 17. Allonen H, Ziegier G, Klotz U: Midazolam kinetics Clin Pharmacol Ther 1971; 30:653-61.
  • 18. McCluskey A, Meakin H: Oral administration of midazolam as a premedicant for paediatric day-case anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1994; 49:782.
  • 19. Hennes HM, Wagner V, Bonadio WA, et al: The effect of oral midazolam on anxiety of preschool children during laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19:1006-9.
  • 20. Van Der Bijl P, Roetofse JA: Disinhibitory reactions to benzodiazepines: A review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49:519.
  • 21. O’Boyle CA: Benzodiazepine-induced amnesia and anaesthetic practice: A review. Psychopharmacol Ser 1988; 6:146.
  • 22. Dubost J, Roche C, Kalfon F: The amnesic effects of midazolam in premedication of children. Can J Anaesthiol 1991; 39:9.