Investigation of Surface Dose Using Film Dosimetry and Commercial Treatment Planning System for Larynx Cancer Treatment with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
Investigation of Surface Dose Using Film Dosimetry and Commercial Treatment Planning System for Larynx Cancer Treatment with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
OBJECTIVESurface dose measurement is challenging, and algorithms of treatment planning systems (TPS) cannotaccurately calculate the surface dose. The aim of this study was to investigate the surface dose withradiochromic film measurement and TPS calculation for larynx cancer treatment using intensity-modulatedradiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).METHODSIMRT and VMAT plans for 5 larynx cancer patients were created using TPS. The plans were transferredto a Rando phantom for radiochromic film measurement. TPS calculations and film measurements werecompared for surface doses.RESULTSTPS underestimated the surface dose for both IMRT and VMAT plans. The average difference betweenTPS calculations and film measurements were found to be 12.9±6.1% and 12.4±7.7% for IMRT andVMAT, respectively. Surface dose was found to be lower in VMAT technique at all measurement points.CONCLUSIONTPS have an important role in radiotherapy treatments. Yet, they are still not adequate for dose measurementsin shallow depths. Underestimations or overestimations in calculations can occur. The error ratioof TPS, which should be considered while evaluating the radiotherapy plans, can be determined by dosimetricmeasurements. Radiochromic films are suitable equipments for this process.
___
- van Vloten WA, Hermans J, van Daal WA. Radiationinduced
skin cancer and radiodermatitis of the head
and neck. Cancer 1987;59(3):411–4.
- Devic S, Seuntjens J, Abdel-Rahman W, Evans M, Olivares
M, Podgorsak EB, et al. Accurate skin dose measurements
using radiochromic film in clinical applications.
Med Phys 2006;33(4):1116–24.
- McCullough EC. A measurement and analysis of buildup
region dose for open field photon beams (cobalt-60
through 24 MV). Med Dosim 1994;19(1):5–14.
- Mellenberg DE Jr. Determination of build-up region
over-response corrections for a Markus-type chamber.
Med Phys 1990;17(6):1041–4.
- Bilge H, Cakir A, Okutan M, Acar H. Surface dose measurements
with GafChromic EBT film for 6 and 18MV
photon beams. Phys Med 2009;25(2):101–4.
- Sjögren R, Karlsson M. Electron contamination
in clinical high energy photon beams. Med Phys
1996;23(11):1873–81.
- Mutic S, Low DA. Superficial doses from serial tomotherapy
delivery. Med Phys 2000;27(1):163–5.
- Shiau AC, Chiu MC, Chen TH, Chiou JF, Shueng PW,
Chen SW, et al. Surface and superficial dose dosimetric
verification for postmastectomy radiotherapy. Med Dosim
2012;37(4):417–24.
- Panettieri V, Barsoum P, Westermark M, Brualla L, Lax
I. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface
build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom
and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code
PENELOPE. Radiother Oncol 2009;93(1):94–101.
- Bragg CM, Conway J. Dosimetric verification of the
anisotropic analytical algorithm for radiotherapy treatment
planning. Radiother Oncol 2006;81(3):315–23.
- Sievinen J, Ulmer W, Kaissl W. AAA Photon Dose Calculation
Model in Eclipse™. Palo Alto (CA): Varian
Medical Systems. 2005:1–18. (RAD #7170B).
- Court LE, Tishler R, Xiang H, Allen AM, Makrigiorgos
M, Chin L. Experimental evaluation of the accuracy of
skin dose calculation for a commercial treatment planning
system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2008;9(1):2792.
- Akino Y, Das IJ, Bartlett GK, Zhang H, Thompson E,
Zook JE. Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between
treatment planning system and measurement for several
breast cancer treatment techniques. Med Phys
2013;40(1):011714.
- Seppälä J, Voutilainen A, Heikkilä J, Vauhkonen M. Surface
doses of flattening filter free beams with volumetric
modulated arc therapy dose delivery for breast cancer.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2017;2:17–22.
- Chakarova R, Gustafsson M, Bäck A, Drugge N, Palm Å,
Lindberg A, et al. Superficial dose distribution in breast
for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation
of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient
geometries. Radiother Oncol 2012;102(1):102–7.
- Almberg SS, Lindmo T, Frengen J. Superficial doses
in breast cancer radiotherapy using conventional and
IMRT techniques: a film-based phantom study. Radiother
Oncol 2011;100(2):259–64.
- Oinam AS, Singh L. Verification of IMRT dose calculations
using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup
regions. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2010;11:3351.
- Polednik M, Abo Madyan Y, Schneider F, Wolff D, Bannach
B, Lambrecht U, et al; Cancer Working Group
(German Cancer Association). Evaluation of calculation
algorithms implemented in different commercial
planning systems on an anthropomorphic breast
phantom using film dosimetry. Strahlenther Onkol
2007;183(12):667–72.
- Chow JC, Jiang R, Leung MK. Dosimetry of oblique
tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/
convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation. J
Appl Clin Med Phys 2010;12(1):3424.
- Hartmann B, Martisiková M, Jäkel O. Homogeneity of
Gafchromic EBT2 film. Med Phys 2010;37(4):1753–6.
- Lindsay P, Rink A, Ruschin M, Jaffray D. Investigation
of energy dependence of EBT and EBT-2 gafchromic
film. Med Phys 2010;37(2):571–6.
- Mizuno H, Takahashi Y, Tanaka A, Hirayama T, Yamaguchi
T, Katou H, et al. Homogeneity of GAFCHROMIC
EBT2 film among different lot numbers. J Appl
Clin Med Phys 2012;13(4):3763.
- Akbas U, Donmez Kesen N, Koksal C, Bilge H. Surface
and Buildup Region Dose Measurements with Markus
Parallel-Plate Ionization Chamber, GafChromic EBT3
Film, and MOSFET Detector for High-Energy Photon
Beams. Adv High Energy Phys 2016;2016:1–10.