Investigation of Surface Dose Using Film Dosimetry and Commercial Treatment Planning System for Larynx Cancer Treatment with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Investigation of Surface Dose Using Film Dosimetry and Commercial Treatment Planning System for Larynx Cancer Treatment with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

OBJECTIVESurface dose measurement is challenging, and algorithms of treatment planning systems (TPS) cannotaccurately calculate the surface dose. The aim of this study was to investigate the surface dose withradiochromic film measurement and TPS calculation for larynx cancer treatment using intensity-modulatedradiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).METHODSIMRT and VMAT plans for 5 larynx cancer patients were created using TPS. The plans were transferredto a Rando phantom for radiochromic film measurement. TPS calculations and film measurements werecompared for surface doses.RESULTSTPS underestimated the surface dose for both IMRT and VMAT plans. The average difference betweenTPS calculations and film measurements were found to be 12.9±6.1% and 12.4±7.7% for IMRT andVMAT, respectively. Surface dose was found to be lower in VMAT technique at all measurement points.CONCLUSIONTPS have an important role in radiotherapy treatments. Yet, they are still not adequate for dose measurementsin shallow depths. Underestimations or overestimations in calculations can occur. The error ratioof TPS, which should be considered while evaluating the radiotherapy plans, can be determined by dosimetricmeasurements. Radiochromic films are suitable equipments for this process.

___

  • van Vloten WA, Hermans J, van Daal WA. Radiationinduced skin cancer and radiodermatitis of the head and neck. Cancer 1987;59(3):411–4.
  • Devic S, Seuntjens J, Abdel-Rahman W, Evans M, Olivares M, Podgorsak EB, et al. Accurate skin dose measurements using radiochromic film in clinical applications. Med Phys 2006;33(4):1116–24.
  • McCullough EC. A measurement and analysis of buildup region dose for open field photon beams (cobalt-60 through 24 MV). Med Dosim 1994;19(1):5–14.
  • Mellenberg DE Jr. Determination of build-up region over-response corrections for a Markus-type chamber. Med Phys 1990;17(6):1041–4.
  • Bilge H, Cakir A, Okutan M, Acar H. Surface dose measurements with GafChromic EBT film for 6 and 18MV photon beams. Phys Med 2009;25(2):101–4.
  • Sjögren R, Karlsson M. Electron contamination in clinical high energy photon beams. Med Phys 1996;23(11):1873–81.
  • Mutic S, Low DA. Superficial doses from serial tomotherapy delivery. Med Phys 2000;27(1):163–5.
  • Shiau AC, Chiu MC, Chen TH, Chiou JF, Shueng PW, Chen SW, et al. Surface and superficial dose dosimetric verification for postmastectomy radiotherapy. Med Dosim 2012;37(4):417–24.
  • Panettieri V, Barsoum P, Westermark M, Brualla L, Lax I. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. Radiother Oncol 2009;93(1):94–101.
  • Bragg CM, Conway J. Dosimetric verification of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiother Oncol 2006;81(3):315–23.
  • Sievinen J, Ulmer W, Kaissl W. AAA Photon Dose Calculation Model in Eclipse™. Palo Alto (CA): Varian Medical Systems. 2005:1–18. (RAD #7170B).
  • Court LE, Tishler R, Xiang H, Allen AM, Makrigiorgos M, Chin L. Experimental evaluation of the accuracy of skin dose calculation for a commercial treatment planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2008;9(1):2792.
  • Akino Y, Das IJ, Bartlett GK, Zhang H, Thompson E, Zook JE. Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques. Med Phys 2013;40(1):011714.
  • Seppälä J, Voutilainen A, Heikkilä J, Vauhkonen M. Surface doses of flattening filter free beams with volumetric modulated arc therapy dose delivery for breast cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2017;2:17–22.
  • Chakarova R, Gustafsson M, Bäck A, Drugge N, Palm Å, Lindberg A, et al. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries. Radiother Oncol 2012;102(1):102–7.
  • Almberg SS, Lindmo T, Frengen J. Superficial doses in breast cancer radiotherapy using conventional and IMRT techniques: a film-based phantom study. Radiother Oncol 2011;100(2):259–64.
  • Oinam AS, Singh L. Verification of IMRT dose calculations using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup regions. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2010;11:3351.
  • Polednik M, Abo Madyan Y, Schneider F, Wolff D, Bannach B, Lambrecht U, et al; Cancer Working Group (German Cancer Association). Evaluation of calculation algorithms implemented in different commercial planning systems on an anthropomorphic breast phantom using film dosimetry. Strahlenther Onkol 2007;183(12):667–72.
  • Chow JC, Jiang R, Leung MK. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/ convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2010;12(1):3424.
  • Hartmann B, Martisiková M, Jäkel O. Homogeneity of Gafchromic EBT2 film. Med Phys 2010;37(4):1753–6.
  • Lindsay P, Rink A, Ruschin M, Jaffray D. Investigation of energy dependence of EBT and EBT-2 gafchromic film. Med Phys 2010;37(2):571–6.
  • Mizuno H, Takahashi Y, Tanaka A, Hirayama T, Yamaguchi T, Katou H, et al. Homogeneity of GAFCHROMIC EBT2 film among different lot numbers. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2012;13(4):3763.
  • Akbas U, Donmez Kesen N, Koksal C, Bilge H. Surface and Buildup Region Dose Measurements with Markus Parallel-Plate Ionization Chamber, GafChromic EBT3 Film, and MOSFET Detector for High-Energy Photon Beams. Adv High Energy Phys 2016;2016:1–10.