Communication Skills between the Relatives and the Doctors of Patients with Cancer Treated in Radiation Oncology: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study

Communication Skills between the Relatives and the Doctors of Patients with Cancer Treated in Radiation Oncology: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the communication between relatives and the doctors of patients with cancer treated in the radiation oncology department using a questionnaire composed of two sections. METHODS Relatives of 168 patients were selected through simple randomization after having obtained informed consent from the patients. A questionnaire form, which was developed based on the patient-physician communication scale, which had the sub-dimensions of information, empathy and confidence and included questions regarding socio-demographic data, and which used a Likert-type scale, was applied. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal Wallis test. RESULTS A statistically significant difference was determined in the information and empathy sub-dimensions concerning the gender and the education level of the relatives (p=0.03, p=0.01, p=0.001) and the frequency of seeing the doctor and the doctor’s tolerance (p=0.007, p=0.02); in the confidence possession sub-dimension, a difference was found between the age groups of the relatives and the tumor groups of the patients (p=0.039, p=0.002), duration of seeing the doctor and talking with the doctor (p=0.004, p=0.009), between the relatives’ praying and all sub-dimensions (p=0.009, p

___

  • 1. Jaffray DA, Gospodarowicz MK. Radiation Therapy for Cancer. In: Gelband H, Jha P, Sankaranarayanan R, Horton S, editors. Cancer: Disease Control Priorities. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2015. Chapter 14.
  • 2. Barton MB, Jacob S, Shafiq J, Wong K, Thompson SR, Hanna TP, et al. Estimating the demand for radiotherapy from the evidence: a review of changes from 2003 to 2012. Radiother Oncol 2014;112(1):140–4.
  • 3. Innes S, Payne S. Advanced cancer patients’ prognostic information preferences: a review. Palliat Med 2009;23(1):29–39.
  • 4. Mackenzie LJ, Sanson-Fisher RW, Carey ML, D’Este CA. Radiation oncology outpatient perceptions of patient-centred care: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2013;3(2):e001265.
  • 5. Hagerty RG, Butow PN, Ellis PM, Dimitry S, Tattersall MH. Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Oncol 2005;16(7):1005–53.
  • 6. Martin EJ, Rich SE, Jones JA, Dharmarajan KV. Communication skill frameworks: applications in radiation oncology. Ann Palliat Med 2019;8(3):293–304. 7. Mackenzie LJ, Carey ML, Suzuki E, Sanson-Fisher RW, Asada H, Ogura M, et al. Agreement between patients’ and radiation oncologists’ cancer diagnosis and prognosis perceptions: A cross sectional study in Japan. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0198437.
  • 8. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995;152(9):1423–33.
  • 9. Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000;49(9):796–804.
  • 10.Griffin SJ, Kinmonth AL, Veltman MW, Gillard S, Grant J, Stewart M. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(6):595–608.
  • 11.Delvaux N, Merckaert I, Marchal S, Libert Y, Conradt S, Boniver J, et al. Physicians’ communication with a cancer patient and a relative: a randomized study assessing the efficacy of consolidation workshops. Cancer. 2005;103(11):2397–411.
  • 12.Mack JW, Ilowite M, Taddei S. Difficult relationships between parents and physicians of children with cancer: A qualitative study of parent and physician perspectives. Cancer 2017;123(4):675–81.
  • 13.Orri M, Sibeoni J, Bousquet G, Labey M, Gueguen J, Laporte C, et al. Crossing the perspectives of patients, families, and physicians on cancer treatment: A qualitative study. Oncotarget 2017;8(13):22113–22.
  • 14.Tates K, Meeuwesen L. Doctor-parent-child communication. A (re)view of the literature. Soc Sci Med 2001;52(6):839–51.
  • 15.Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Mercer SW, Warm M, Wolf J, et al. Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns 2007;69(1-3):63–75.
  • 16.Oksüzoğlu B, Abali H, Bakar M, Yildirim N, Zengin N. Disclosure of cancer diagnosis to patients and their relatives in Turkey: views of accompanying persons and influential factors in reaching those views. Tumori 2006;92(1):62–6.
  • 17.Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Nielsen EL, Au DH, Patrick DL. Patient-physician communication about end-oflife care for patients with severe COPD. Eur Respir J 2004;24(2):200–5.
  • 18.Cicekci F, Duran N, Ayhan B, Arican S, Ilban O, Kara I, et al. The communication between patient relatives and physicians in intensive care units. BMC Anesthesiol 2017;17(1):97.
  • 19.Schwartz KL, Roe T, Northrup J, Meza J, Seifeldin R, Neale AV. Family medicine patients’ use of the Internet for health information: a MetroNet study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19(1):39–45.
  • 20.Kim J, Kim S. Physicians’ perception of the effects of Internet health information on the doctor-patient relationship. Inform Health Soc Care 2009;34(3):136–48.
  • 21.Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, Donelan K, Catania J, Lee K, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res 2003;5(3):e17.
  • 22.Helft PR, Hlubocky F, Daugherty CK. American oncologists’ views of internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. J Clin Oncol 2003;21(5):942–7.
  • 23.Yalçin A, Silay K, Büyükçelik A, Işikdoğan A, Türk HM, Coşkun HŞ, et al. Opinions of the Turkish population on cancer and being informed of the diagnosis of cancer. Turk J Med Sci 2015;45(2):387–92.
  • 24.Kazdaglis GA, Arnaoutoglou C, Karypidis D, Memekidou G, Spanos G, Papadopoulos O. Disclosing the truth to terminal cancer patients: a discussion of ethical and cultural issues. East Mediterr Health J 2010;16(4):442–7.
  • 25.Ha JF, Longnecker N. Doctor-patient communication: a review. Ochsner J 2010;10(1):38–43.
  • 26.Fujimori M, Uchitomi Y. Preferences of cancer patients regarding communication of bad news: a systematic literature review. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2009;39(4):201–16.
  • 27.Hunsucker SC, Frank DI, Flannery J. Meeting the needs of rural families during critical illness: the APN’s role. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 1999;18(3):24–32. 28.Fassier T, Darmon M, Laplace C, Chevret S, Schlemmer B, Pochard F, et al. One-day quantitative cross-sectional study of family information time in 90 intensive care units in France. Crit Care Med 2007;35(1):177–83.
  • 29.Leung KK, Chien WT, Mackenzie AE. Needs of Chinese families of critically ill patients. West J Nurs Res 2000;22(7):826–40.
  • 30.Learning objectives for medical student education-- guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med 1999;74(1):13–8.
  • 31.Price S, Mercer SW, MacPherson H. Practitioner empathy, patient enablement and health outcomes: a prospective study of acupuncture patients. Patient Educ Couns 2006;63(1-2):239–45.
Türk Onkoloji Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7467
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Ali Cangül
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: A Paraneoplastic Dermatosis in Breast Carcinoma?

Özgen ARSLAN SOLMAZ, Birol YILDIZ, Ahmet KILIÇARSLAN, Selma BAKAR DERTLİOĞLU, Pervin KARABULUT

Nurses Attitudes Toward Cancer and Affecting Factors

Emine Derya İSTER, Yasemin ALTINBAŞ

Treatment Outcomes and Patterns of Failure in Elderly Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy

Gautam SARMA, Luri BORAH, Jyotiman NATH, Mouchumee BHATTACHARYYA, Partha Pratim MEDHI, Apurba Kumar KALITA

Active Surveillance Perspectives of Radiation Oncologists, Medical Oncologists and Urologists in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Ali ALKAN, İlker AKARKEN, Hayrettin ŞAHİN, Özgür TANRIVERDİ, Görkem TÜRKKAN

Inhibition of miR-19a-3p Increases Bortezomib-Induced Apoptosis in Myeloma Cell Lines by Targeting SOCS3

Azam KAZEMI, Saeid ABROUN, Masoud SOLEIMANI

Thymol May be an Effective Agent in the Treatment of Liver and Kidney Damages Caused by Ionizing Radiation

Hilal KIZILTUNÇ ÖZMEN, Yılmaz ŞAHİN, Ayhan TANYELİ, Fazile Nur EKİNCİ AKDEMİR, Gizem ESER, Serkan YILDIRIM, Yasin BAYIR, Ayşenur KAHRAMANLAR

Dosimetric Evaluation of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Treatment Plans for Prostate Cancer

Samuel ADENEYE, , Michael AKPOCHAFOR, Akintayo OMOJOLA, Adedayo JOSEPH, Muhammed HABEEBU, John AWHARIADO, Moses AWEDA, Abayomi DUROSINNMI-ETT

Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Craniospinal Radiotherapy of Childhood

Ömer UZEL, Elif Eda ÖZER, Songül KARAÇAM, Yasin ÇOBAN, Fulya ÇİFTER

A Comprehensive Review on Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) and Photothermal Therapy (PTT) for Cancer Treatment

Ritesh BHOLE, Chandrakant BONDE, Prachi KADAM, Ravindra WAVWALE

Relation between Histopathology of Head and Neck Cancers and FDG-PET/CT Parameters

Ahmet Volkan SÜNTER, Özgür YİĞİT, Esra MİSİR, Cihan GÜNDOĞAN, Suat BİLİCİ