A Study of Uro-oncology Patient Perceptions of Social Support and Hope Levels

A Study of Uro-oncology Patient Perceptions of Social Support and Hope Levels

OBJECTIVE The present study measured social support perceptions and hope levels of uro-oncology patients diagnosed with cancer and examined how they vary according to sociodemographic variables. METHODS Research was conducted on 143 uro-oncology patients in Konya, Turkey, using a sociodemographic information form, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and the Hope Scale. RESULTS Patient mean multidimensional perceived social support score was quite high at 62.14±14.99, and mean hope level score was 20.62±4.50. Hope level score was significantly higher in male patients. It was also higher for patients with dependents and for patients who believed their cancer was treatable. Perceived social support levels of patients with dependents and patients who believed their cancer was treatable were also significantly higher. CONCLUSION Hope levels of uro-oncology patients are affected positively by high levels of perceived social support. Women, patients with dependents, and patients who develop a positive attitude toward their cancer treatment were more hopeful than others

___

  • 1. Barber FD. Social support and physical activity engagement by cancer survivors. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2012;16:84–9.
  • 2. Holland CJ, Weiss RT. History of psycho-oncology. In: Holland JC, Breitbart WS, Jacobsen PB, Lederberg MS, Loscalzo MJ, Mc Corkle RS, editors. Psycho-oncology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 3–11.
  • 3. American Cancer Society. Global Cancer Facts & F igures 3rd edition. Atlanta: American Cancer Society. 2015. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-044738.pdf [Access date: 12.12.2015].
  • 4. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu Kanser İstatistikleri. http://kanser.gov.tr/ Dosya/2015haberler1/Kanser_insidanslari_2012_ kisa_rapor.pdf [Access date: 15.03.2015].
  • 5. Aydın S, Boz MY. Rapid changes in the incidence of urinary system cancers in Turkey. Turk J Urol 2015;41(4):215–20.
  • 6. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu Kanser İstatistikleri. http://kanser.gov.tr/ Dosya/2015haberler1/Kanser_insidanslari_2012_ kisa_rapor.pdf [Access date: 15.03.2015].
  • 7. Ülger E, Alacacıoğlu A, Gülseren AŞ, Zencir G, Demir L, Tarhan MO. Psychosocial problems in cancer and the importance of psychosocial oncology. DEÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2014;28(2):85–92.
  • 8. Anuk D, Özkan M, Alçalar N. İstanbul Üniversitesi Konsültasyon Liyezon Psikiyatrisi Bilim Dalı Psikoonkoloji çalışmalarının 2 yıllık dökümü. 5. Ulusal Konsültasyon Liyezon Psikiyatrisi Kongre Kitabı, İstanbul. 1999. s. 174–81.
  • 9. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Tedavi Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Türkiye Onkoloji Hizmetleri Yeniden Yapılanma Programı 2010-2023. http://www.rivosem.com.tr/wp-content/ uploads/2015/04/T%C3%BCrkiye-OnkolojiHizmetleri-Yeniden-Yap%C4%B1land%C4%B1rmaProgram%C4%B1.pdf. [Access date: 10.12.2015].
  • 10.Firshein R. Life Support. Psychology today. 1999;32(4):28–9.
  • 11.Işıkhan V. Kanser ve yaşam kalitesi. Nihal Turan’a armağan: Sosyal hizmetlerde yeni yaklaşımlar ve sorun alanları. Editör: Duyan V, Mavili Aktaş A. Ankara: 1999. s. 171.
  • 12.Eliott JA, Olver IN. Hope and hoping in the talk of dying cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 2007;64(1):138–49.
  • 13.Chen ML. Pain and hope in patients with cancer: a role for cognition. Cancer Nurs 2003;26(1):61–7.
  • 14.Öz F. Sağlık alanında temel kavramlar. İmaj İç ve Dış A.Ş. Ankara: 2004.
  • 15.Dean A. Talking to dying patients of their hopes and needs. Nurs Times 2002;98(43):34–5.
  • 16.Elbi MH. Kanserde anksiyete bozuklukları ve depresyon dahiliye ve psikiyatri VI, I. Basım. İstanbul: Okuyanus Yayın; 2004.
  • 17.Eker D, Arkar H. Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 1995;10:45–55.
  • 18.Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of PersonalityAssessment 1998;52:30–41.
  • 19.Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldız H. Factorial Structure, Validity, and Reliability of Revised Form of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2001;12(1):17–25.
  • 20.Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, Holleran SA, Irving LM, Sigmon ST, et al. The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991;60(4):570– 85.
  • 21.Akman Y, Korkut F. Umut ölçeği üzerine bir çalışma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 1993;9:193–202.
  • 22.Dedeli Ö, Fadıloğlu Ç, Uslu R. A survey of functional living and social support in patients with cancer. Turk J Oncol 2008;23(3):132–9.
  • 23.Tan M, Okanlı A, Karabulutlu E, Erdem N. The Evaluation of Relationship Between Social Support and Hopelessness in Hemodialysis Patients. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2005;8(2):32–9.
  • 24.Arslantaş H, Adana F, Kaya F, Turan D. Hopelessness and Social Support Level in The Inpatients and Factors Affecting Them. İ.Ü.F.N. Hemşirelik Dergisi 2010;18(2):87–97.
  • 25.Landmark BT, Strandmark M, Wahl A. Breast cancer and experiences of social support. In-depth interviews of 10 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Scand J Caring Sci 2002;16(3):216–23.
  • 26.Faghani S, Rahmani A, Parizad N, Mohajjel-Aghdam AR, Hassankhani H, Mohammadpoorasl A. Social support and its predictors among Iranian cancer survivors. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15(22):9767–71.
  • 27.Aslan Ö, Sekmen K, Kömürcü Ş, Özet A. Kanserli Hastalarda Umut. C.Ü. Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2007;11(2):18–24.
  • 28.Jo KH, Son BK. The relationship of uncertainty, hope and quality of life in patients with breast cancer. [Article in Korean] Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi 2004;34(7):1184–93. [Abstract]
  • 29.Özdaş T, Olgun N. Hopelessness Levels of Bone Marrow Transplant Patients and The Affecting Factors. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi 2015;2(1):12–21.
  • 30.Lin CC, Tsai HF, Chiou JF, Lai YH, Kao CC, Tsou TS. Changes in levels of hope after diagnostic disclosure among Taiwanese patients with cancer. Cancer Nurs 2003;26(2):155–60.
  • 31.Irving LM, Snyder CR, Crowson JJ Jr. Hope and coping with cancer by college women. J Pers 1998;66(2):195– 214.
  • 32. Dansuk R, Ağargün M, Kars B, Ağargün HP, Turan C, Ünal O. Evaluation of the Psychosocial Characteristics of Gyneacologic Cancer Patients. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2002;12(2);142–7.
  • 33.Crothers MK, Tomter HD, Garske JP. The relation ships between satisfaction with social support, affect balance, and hope in cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol 2005;23(4):103–18.
  • 34.Vellone E, Rega ML, Galletti C, Cohen MZ. Hope and related variables in Italian cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 2006;29(5):356–66.
  • 35.Fadıloğlu Ç, Cantilav Ş, Yıldırım YK, Tokem Y. The relationship between hopelessness and coping strategies with breast cancer women. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2006;22(2):147–60.