Either Economize on Knowledge or Capitalize on Intellectuality: Educational Challenges for Economic Growth in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus

Entelektüel sermaye, bilgi ekonomisinin en önemli unsurlarından birisidir. Bilgi yönetimi literatüründe entelektüel sermaye ekonomik ve kültürel kalkınma açısından önemli faktörlerden biri olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu nedenle, entelektüel sermaye birikimini oluşturan eğitim, ekonomik büyümenin vazgeçilmez bir değişkenidir. Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti (KKTC)'nde eğitim, adada on üç üniversite olması sebebi ile ekonomik büyüme için önem teşkil etmekte, hükümetler tarafından öncü sektör olarak adlandırılmaktadır. Bu çalışma KKTC'nde bilgi ekonomisinin önemini vurgulayarak vatandaşların ve devletin bu konudaki farkındalığını artırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Söz konusu farkındalığın oluşabilmesi için, öncelikle bilgi ekonomisi değişkenlerinin ekonomik büyümeye olan etkisi ölçülmüş, Engle-Granger nedensellik testi kullanılarak bilgi ekonomisi değişkenlerinin büyümeye neden olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Bu bağlamda okuryazarlık oranı, genel ve teknik liselere katılım oranı ve yükseköğretime katılım oranı bilgi ekonomisi değişkenleri olarak kullanılmıştır. Geliştirilmiş Cobb-Douglas üretim fonksiyonuyla geleneksel üretim faktörlerinin yanı sıra, entelektüel sermayenin üretim sürecindeki etkisi 1977-2010 yılları için ölçülmüş ve üretimde artan verimin ekonomik büyümeye olan etkisi vurgulanmıştır. Makalede KKTC ekonomisinin bilgi ekonomisi karakterini taşıyıp taşımadığı, kurulan model ve yapılan testler aracılığıyla denetlenmiş ve KKTC ekonomisinin bilgi ekonomisi olma yolunda potansiyeli olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Ya Bilgi Üzerine İktisadileş ya da Entelektüalite Üzerine Sermayeleş: Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti'nde Ekonomik Büyüme için Eğitime Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Intellectual capital appears as the most important component of knowledge economy. It is very well known in the knowledge management literature that knowledge has become an engine of social, economic and cultural development in today's world. Thus, education is a vital factor for the accumulation of intellectual capital to reach economic growth. There are thirteen universities in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC), and higher education is a major sector. Income generated from the education sector as well as the accelerating number of universities are two important factors which TRNC government should pay attention to in regards to education and knowledge creation activities. The study aims to emphasize the importance of knowledge economy and to create both public and government awareness particularly for TRNC and for other small economies as well. The Engle-Granger Causality test in VAR model was used to analyse the causal relationship between education and economic growth in TRNC and the results indicate a positive impact of knowledge economy variables on the economy's productivity level. Literacy rate, general and technical high school enrolment rate and higher education enrolment rate is used as knowledge economy variables. Furthermore, the extended Cobb-Douglas production function is applied for the 1977-2010 period and emphasizes the increasing returns to scale in the production process within a given period in TRNC. Overall results show that the TRNC economy has a potential to become a knowledge economy.

___

  • Adamska, M., Minarova M. (2014). Role of learning organization in building consumer confidence. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 17(1), 62-72.
  • Alipour, M. (2012). The effects of international capital on firm performance: An investigation of Iran insurance companies. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(1), 53-66.
  • Asgeirsdottir, B. (2006). OECD work on knowledge and knowledge economy. In Kahin B. Foray D. (Ed.). Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy. (pp. 1-9). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Batool, A., Zulfiqar S. (2013). Analyzing the input output relationship of small and medium enterprises in Pakistan: An econometric approach. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, 1(1), 66-73.
  • Burdus, E. (2008). Management schimbrii organizationale. In Sarayreh B. H., Khudair H., Barakat E. (2013), Comparative Study: The Kurt Lewin of Change Management. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 2(4),1.
  • Burnes, B., (2004). Kurt Lewin and planned approach to change: a re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies. 41(6), 972-1002.
  • Catasus, B. and Chaminade, C. (2007). Intellectual capital: paradoxes and expansions. In Intellectual capital revisited: paradoxes in the knowledge intensive organization, (pp. 1-7). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Cavusoglu, B. (2014). Intellectual capital as an engine of growth: analysis of causality for North Cyprus economy. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 1137- 1145). Santarem, Portugal: Academic Publishing.
  • Cavusoglu, B., Sagsan M. (2011). National knowledge management strategy for the TRNC: recommendations for small island economies. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference of Knowledge Management (pp. 190-198). University of Passau. Germany: Academic Publishing.
  • Chavula, H. K. (2010). The role of knowledge in economic growth. The African perspective. In: ICT, Science and Technology Division (ISTD), (pp. 1-26). Ethiopia: United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA).
  • Cobb, C. W. and Douglas P. H. (1928). A Theory of production, American Economic Review. 18(1), 139-165.
  • Delina, R. and Drab, R. (2010). Socio-economic aspects of trust building for the electronic business platforms. E&M Ekonomie a Management. 13(4), 110-122.
  • Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing intellectual capital at Skandia. Lang Range Planning, 30(3), 366-73.
  • Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M. (1997). Intellectual capital. New York: Harper Business.
  • Ekelund, B. R. and Hebert F. R. (1997). A history of economic theory and method. 4th ed., Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
  • Foray, D. (2006), Optimizing the use of knowledge. In: Advancing knowledge and the knowledge economy (pp: 9-15). England: MIT Press.
  • Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic econometrics. 3rd edition. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
  • Gülle, M. T. (2015). Is it possible for Turkey to be an information society?. Turkish Librarianship, 29(1), 57-62.
  • Hronec, S., Merickova B., and Marcinekova Z. (2008). The medicine education investment evaluation methods. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 11(2), 89-98.
  • Huang, Y. C. and Wu, Yç, C., (2010). Intellectual capital and knowledge productivity: Taiwan biotech. Industry Manage Decision, 48(4), 580-599.
  • Janecek. V. and Hynek, J. (2010). Incentive system as a factor of firms' efficiency improvement. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 13(1), 76-90.
  • Kajdiz, R. and Bojnec, S. (2014). Determinants of public expenditures for medicinal products in non- hospital consumption in Slovenia. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 17(3), 27.
  • Katırcıoglu, S., and Fethi S., Caner, H. (2014). Testing the higher education-led growth hypothesis in a small island: an empirical investigation from a new version of the solow growth model. Quality & Quantity, 48(1), 729-744.
  • Keselevic, A. (2008). Going beyond the derogative attitude towards knowledge within particular scientific communities. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 11(3), 73-84.
  • Lewin K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(3), 143-153.
  • Lin, J. L. (2008). Notes on testing causality. Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Department of Economics. http://faculty.ndhu.edu.tw/~jlin/files/causality.pdf Chengchi University, 3-22. Accessed:
  • Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
  • Malhotra, Y. (2003), Measuring knowledge assets of a nation: knowledge systems for development. Research paper prepared for the invited keynote presentation delivered at the United Nations Advisory meeting of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Division of Public Administration and Development Management, Ad Hoc Group of Experts Meeting. Knowledge Systems for Development, United Nations Headquarters, New York, 4 - 5 September. Accessed: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.6.878&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  • Marcin, K. (2013). Intellectual capital as a key factor of socio-economic development of regions and countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6(1), 288-295.
  • Maresova, P. (2010). Knowledge management in Czech enterprises. E&M Ekonomie a Management, 13(1), 131-144.
  • Ngugi, J. K., Gakure, R., W., Were, M., S, Ngugi, P., K and Kibiru, C. R., (2012). The influence of intellectual capital on growth of small and medium enterprises in Kenya. Journal of Business Management and Corporate Affairs, 1(1), 11-19.
  • Noordin, M. A. and Mohtar, S. (2013). An exploratory of the intangible assets: Methods of measuring intellectual capital. In: 3rd International Conference on Business, Economics, Management and Behavioural Sciences (ICBEMBS'2013), April 29-30 2013 (pp.311-315). Singapore: Academic Publishing.
  • Official Receiver and Registrar Office (ORRO), (2014), Annual report. Nicosia: TRNC Prime Ministry.
  • Powel, W. W. and Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 199-220.
  • Rajnoha, R., Dobrovic J. (2011). Simultaneous management of economics and business processes by added value knowledge. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 14(1), 53-69.
  • Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
  • Ross, J. (1998). Intellectual capital: Navigating in the new business landscape. New York: NY University Press.
  • Sarayreh, B. H., Khudair and H., Barakat, E. A., (2013). Comparative study: The Kurt Lewin of change management. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 2(4), 1-4.
  • Skandia (1996). Power of innovation: intellectual capital. Supplement to Skandia's 1996 Interim Annual Report. Stockholm: Skandia.
  • Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  • State Planning Organisation (SPO) (2011). Macroeconomic indicators. Nicosia: TRNC Prime Ministry.
  • State Planning Organisation (SPO) (2013). Economic and social indicators. Nicosia: TRNC Prime Ministry.
  • Steward, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.
  • Suciu, M. C. and Bratescu, A. G. (2010). Intellectual capital, innovation and creativity as key drivers for long-run sustainable development in the context of the creative economy and knowledge based society. In: Proceedings of 5th WSEAS International Conference on economy and Management Transformation, Romania, V. 2 (pp. 464-469).
  • Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Szabo Z. K., Soltes M. and Helman E. (2013). Innovative capacity & performance of transition economies: Comparative study at the level of enterprises. E & M Ekonomie a Management, 16(1), 52-68.
  • Tonta Y. and Küçük, M. E. (2005). Main dynamics of the transition from industrial society to information society. Turkish Librarianship, 19(4), 1-14.
  • UNECE (2002). Towards knowledge based economy. Regional assessment report. New York: United Nations.
  • World Bank (2012). Knowledge assessment methodology. Accessed: www.worldbank.org/kam
  • Investment Development Agency (YAGA) (2012), Investor guide. Nicosia: TRNC Prime Ministry.