OVER TÜMÖRLERİNDE SERUM VEGF DÜZEYİNİN DİAGNOSTİK
VE PROGNOSTİK DEĞERi
Amaç: Bu çalışmada over tümörü tanısı alan hastalarda serum VEGF (vasküler endotelyal büyüme faktörü) düzeyinin serum fibrinojen, D-dimer ve tümör markerları düzeyleri ile korelasyonu ve bu hastalarda diagnostik ve prognostik değerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Materyal-Metod: Over tümörü ön tanısıyla opere olan 68 hastanın preoperatif serum VEGF, fibrinojen, D-dimer ve tümör markerları (Ca-125, Ca 19-9, Ca 15-3, CEA) düzeyleri belirlendi. 30 hasta epitelyal over kanseri, 38 hasta benign over tümörü tanısı aldı. Serum VEGF düzeylerinin tümör markerları, fibrinojen ve D-dimer düzeyleriyle ilişkisi analiz edildi. Sonuçlar: Epitelyal over kanseri grubunda benign over tümörü grubuna göre serum VEGF düzeyleri anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti. Serum VEGF düzeyinin 167 pg/ml cut-off değerinde over kanseri tanısında sensitivite, spesifite, pozitif prediktif değer ve negatif prediktif değeri sırasıyla %70, %68.4, %63.6 ve %72.4 olarak belirlendi. Epitelyal over kanseri grubunda preoperatif serum VEGF değeri ile Ca125, Ca 19-9, Ca 15-3, CEA, D-dimer, ve fibrinojen değerleri arasında ilişki saptanmadı (p>0.05). Cox regresyon analizi sonuçları cut-off de- ğeri üzerindeki serum VEGF düzeylerinin daha kısa survi ile korele olduğunu gösterdi. Tartışma: Bu verilere göre malign over tümörlerini ayırt etmede serum VEGF düzeyleri yararlı bir serolojik biomarker olarak kullanı- labilir. 167 pg/ml üzerindeki VEGF düzeyleri kanser sebepli ölüm için bağımsız risk faktörü olarak değerlendirilebilir
Background: The present study aimed to analyze the correlation of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with fibrinogen, D-dimer and tumor markers in patients with ovarian mass and to evaluate its diagnostic and prognostic value in these patients. Materials and Methods: Preoperative serum VEGF, fibrinogen, D-dimer levels and tumor markers (Ca 125, Ca19-9, Ca 15-3, CEA) were assessed in 30 women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and 38 women with benign ovarian tumors. VEGF concentration was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The correlations of serum VEGF with Ca 125, Ca19-9, Ca 15-3, CEA, Ddimer and fibrinogen were also analyzed. Results: Serum VEGF levels in patients with EOC were significantly higher than those with benign ovarian mass. At a cut-off of 167 pg/ml; the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values of serum VEGF levels for diagnosing ovarian carcinoma were 70%, 68.4%, 63.6% and 72.4%, respectively. No significant correlation was found between preoperative serum VEGF and Ca 125, Ca19-9, Ca 15-3, CEA, D-dimer and fibrinogen levels in the EOC group (p>0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that serum VEGF level over the cut-off value was correlated with shorter survival (p<0.001). Conclusion: These data suggest that VEGF may be a useful serological biomarker in differentiating benign adnexal masses from EOC. Preoperative VEGF levels >167 pg/ml are an independent risk factor for cancer related death.
___
- 1. Candido Dos Reis FJ, Moreira de Andrade J, Bighetti S.
CA 125 and vascular endothelial growth factor in the
differential diagnosis of epithelial ovarian tumors.
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;54(3):132-6.
- 2. Li L, Wang L, Zhang W, Tang B, Zhang J, Song H et al.
Correlation of serum VEGF levels with clinical stage,
therapy efficacy, tumor metastasis and patient survival
in ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res. 2004;24(3b):1973-9.
- 3. Ma Y, Qian Y, Lv W. The correlation between plasma
fibrinogen levels and the clinical features of patients
with ovarian carcinoma. J Int Med Res. 2007;35(5):678-
84.
- 4. Gadducci A, Cosio S, Tana R, Genazzani AR. Serum
and tissue biomarkers as predictive and prognostic variables
in epithelial ovarian cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol.
2009;69(1):12-27.
- 5. Koh SC, Khalil R, Lim FK, Ilancheran A, Choolani M.
The association between fibrinogen, von Willebrand
Factor, antithrombin III, and D-dimer levels and survival
outcome by 36 months from ovarian cancer. Clin
Appl Thromb Hemost. 2006;12(1):3-8.
- 6. Oehler MK, Caffier H. Diagnostic value of serum VEGF
in women with ovarian tumors. Anticancer Res.
1999;19(4A):2519-22.
- 7. Gadducci A, Ferdeghini M, Fanucchi A, Annicchiarico
C, Ciampi B, Prontera C et al. Serum preoperative vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in epithelial ovarian
cancer: relationship with prognostic variables and
clinical outcome. Anticancer Res. 1999;19(2B):1401-5.
- 8. Fasciani A, D’Ambrogio G, Bocci G, Luisi S, Artini PG,
Genazzani AR. Vascular endothelial growth factor and
interleukin-8 in ovarian cystic pathology. Fertil Steril.
2001;75(6):1218-21.
- 9. Demirkiran F, Kumbak B, Bese T, Arvas M, Benian A,
Aydin S et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in adnexal
masses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(1):53-8.
- 10. Cooper BC, Ritchie JM, Broghammer CL, Coffin J, Sorosky
JI, Buller RE et al. Preoperative serum vascular
endothelial growth factor levels: significance in ovarian
cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(10):3193-7.
- 11. Hefler LA, Zeillinger R, Grimm C, Sood AK, Cheng
WF, Gadducci A et al. Preoperative serum vascular endothelial
growth factor as a prognostic parameter in
ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103(2):512-7.
- 12. Dehaven K, Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C. Comparison
of serum vascular endothelial growth levels between
patients with and without ovarian malignancies. Int J
Gynecol Cancer. 2002;12(6):715-9.
- 13. Rudlowski C, Pickart AK, Fuhljahn C, Friepoertner T,
Schlehe B, Biesterfeld S et al. Prognostic significance of
vascular endothelial growth factor expression in ovarian
cancer patients: a long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol
Cancer. 2006;16 Suppl 1:183-9.
- 14. von Tempelhoff GF, Dietrich M, Niemann F, Schneider
D, Hommel G, Heilmann L. Blood coagulation and
thrombosis in patients with ovarian malignancy.
Thromb Haemost. 1997;77(3):456-61
- 15. Gadducci A, Marrai R, Baicchi U, Ferdeghini M, Fanucchi
A, Weiss C et al. Preoperative D-dimer plasma
assay is not a predictor of clinical outcome for patients
with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol.1997;66(1):85-8.