Tek Taraflı Arka Çapraz Kapanışa Sahip Çocuklarda Yumuşak Doku Burun Deliği Genişliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Bu çalışma, maksiller transversal darlık kaynaklı tek taraflı arka çapraz kapanışa sahip çocuklarda, yumuşak doku burun deliği genişliklerini çapraz kapanış ve normal kapanış tarafları arasında karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Birey ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, ortodonti kliniğinde tedavi edilmiş olan 30 hastanın tedavi başı ağız içi ve dışı cephe fotoğrafları kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubu, sağ ya da sol yarım çenede tek taraflı arka çapraz kapanışa sahip, ortalama yaşı 9 yıl 8 ay olan 15 (6 erkek, 9 kız) bireyden; kontrol grubu ise sağ ve sol tarafta normal arka kapanış ilişkisine sahip, ortalama yaşı 12 yıl 2 ay olan 15 (5 erkek, 10 kız) bireyden oluşturulmuştur. Fotoğraflar üzerinde sağ ve sol burun kanatları arasında oluşturulan yatay doğruya burun deliklerinin en dış ve en iç noktalarından indirilen dikmeler arasındaki mesafeler ölçülerek veri seti oluşturulmuştur. Elde edilen verilerin grup içi karşılaştırmalarında eşli örnek t testi ve gruplar arası karşılaştırmalarda bağımsız örnek t testi kullanılmıştır. Anlamlılık düzeyi p

Evaluation of Soft Tissue Nostril Width in Children with Unilateral Posterior Crossbite

ABSTRACT Aim: This study aims to compare soft tissue nostril widths between crossbite and normal occlusion in children with unilateral posterior crossbite due to maxillary transversal deficiency. Subject and Method: In this retrospective study, intraoral and extraoral photographs of 30 patients who were treated in the orthodontic clinic were used. The study group was consisted of 15 individuals (6 boys, 9 girls) with a unilateral posterior crossbite in the right or left posterior segment, with a mean age of 9 years 8 months; the control group was consisted of 15 individuals (5 boys, 10 girls) with a normal posterior bite relationship on the right and left, with a mean age of 12 years and 2 months. The data set was created by measuring the distances between the outermost and innermost points of the nostrils on the photographs. The data was analyzed with paired sample t-test for intragroup comparisons and independent sample t-test for intergroup comparisons. Significance level was accepted as p

___

  • 1. Proffit WR. Fields HW. Sarver DM. Concepts of Growth and Development. In: Profitt WR, editor. Contemprary Orthodontics. 5th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2014;20- 66.
  • 2. Björk A, Skieller V. Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod.1977 Apr;4(2):53-64. doi: 10.1179/bjo.4.2.53.
  • 3. McNamara A, James A. Maxillary transverse deficiency. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 May;117(5):567-70.doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70202-2.
  • 4. Altug-Atac AT, Atac MS, Kurt G, Karasud HA. Changes in nasal structures following orthopedic and surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;39(2):129-35.
  • 5. Laptook T. Conductive hearing loss and rapid maxillary expansion: report of a case. Am J Orthod. 1981 Sep;80(3):325-31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90294-3.
  • 6. Kurol J. Impacted and ankylosed teeth: Why, when, and how to intervene. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr;129(4 Suppl):S86-90.doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.008.
  • 7. Halazonetis DJ. Morphometric evaluation of soft-tissue profile shape. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Apr;131(4):481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.031.
  • 8. Primozic J, Perinetti G, Contardo L, Ovsenik M. Facial soft tissue changes during the pre-pubertal and pubertal growth phase: a mixed longitudinal laser-scanning study. Eur J Orthod. 2017 Feb;39(1):52-60.doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw008. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
  • 9. Meneghini F. Views of Clinical Facial Photography. Clinical facial analysis: elements, principles, and techniques. Springer Science & Business Media. 2012;23- 32.
  • 10. Djordjevic J, Zhurov AI, Richmond S, Consortium V. Genetic and Environmental Contributions tom Facial Morphological Variation: A 3D Population-Based Twin Study. PloS ONE 11(9): e0162250. doi:10.1371.
  • 11. Baydaş B, Erdem A, Yavuz I, Ceylan I. Heritability of facial proportions and soft-tissue profile characteristics in Turkish Anatolian siblings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Apr;131(4):504-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.05.055.
  • 12. Fabiana B, Alberto B, Salvatore R, Alessandro N, Paola C. Is there a correlation between nasal septum deviation and maxillary transversal deficiency? A retrospective study on prepubertal subjects. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Apr;83:109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.01.036.
  • 13. Sollenius O, Golež A, Primožič J, Ovsenik M, Bondemark L, Petrén S. Three-dimensional evaluation of forced unilateral posterior crossbite correction in the mixed dentition: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2020 Sep 11;42(4):415-425.doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz054.
  • 14. Torun GS. Soft tissue changes in the orofacial region after rapid maxillary expansion : A cone beam computed tomography study. J Orofac Orthop. 2017 May;78(3):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0074-9.
  • 15. Metzler P, Geiger EJ, Chang CC, Steinbacher DM. Surgically assisted maxillary expansion imparts three-dimensional nasal change. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):2005-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.
  • 16. Magnusson A, Bjerklin K, Kim H, Nilsson P, Marcusson A. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of changes to the external features of the nose after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion and orthodontic treatment: a prospective longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Sep;144(3):404-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.013.
  • 17. Karabiber G, Yılmaz HN.Does unilateral surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) lead to perinasal asymmetry? J Orofac Orthop. 2021 Aug 6.doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00333-y.