Mustafa UÇAR

32422

1998 Tarihli Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Roma Statüsü’nün Konu Bakımından Yargı Yetkisine İlişkin Hükümlerinin Kimyasal Silahlar Açısından Yorumlanması

Bu çalışmanın konusunu kimyasal silahların Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’nin yargı yetkisi dahilinde olup olmadığı sorunu oluşturmaktadır. Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’ni kuran 1998 tarihli Roma Statüsü’nün mahkemenin konu bakımından yetkisini düzenleyen hükümleri arasında kimyasal silahlar terimine açıkça yer verilmemiştir. Kimyasal silahlar terimine açıkça yer verilmemesinin haricinde asıl tartışma konusu, bu terimin Statü’nün taslak maddelerinde yer almasına rağmen metnin son halinden çıkarılmasıdır. Bu da taraf devletlerin kimyasal silah kullanımını bilinçli olarak cezasız bırakıp bırakmadığı tartışmasını beraberinde getirmiştir. Bu tartışma da uluslararası antlaşmaların yorumu ve bu yorumda hazırlık çalışmalarının ne ölçüde kullanılabileceği problemi ile doğrudan ilgilidir. Çalışmada hazırlık çalışmalarından, Statü’ye taraf devletlerin kimyasal silahları Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi’nin yargı yetkisi kapsamı dışında bıraktıkları sonucunun çıkarılıp çıkarılamayacağı ve Statü’nün 8. maddesinin kimyasal silahları kapsadığı şekilde yorumlanıp yorumlanamayacağı konusu açıklığa kavuşturulmaya çalışılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Kimyasal silahlar, 1998 Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Roma Statüsü, uluslararası antlaşmaların yorumlanması, hazırlık çalışmaları

The Interpretation of the Provisions on Jurisdiction of the 1998 Rome Statute of International Criminal Court in Regards to Chemical Weapons

The subject of this study is whether chemical weapons are within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. The Rome Statute of 1998, which established the International Criminal Court did not explipictly included the term of chemical weapons among its provisions, which regulates the Court's jurisdiction in terms of jurisdiction ratione materiae. Apart from the fact that the term of chemical weapons is not explicitly included, the main subject of discussion is although chemical weapons is included in the draft articles of the Statute, the omission of this term from the final version. This brought the debate whether the state delegates deliberately left the use of chemical weapons unpunished. This discussion is directly related to the problem of interpretation of international treaties and then the extent to which preparatory work can be used in this interpretation. In the study, it was tried to clarify whether it can be deduced from the preparatory work that the states delegates to the Statute exclude chemical weapons from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and whether the article 8 of the Statute can be interpreted as including chemical weapons.
Keywords:

Chemical weapons, 1998 Rome Statute of International Criminal Court, treaty interpretation, preparatory work,

PDF

___

  • AKANDE, Dapo. “Can the ICC Prosecute for Use of Chemical Weapons in Syria? EJIL:Talk!” Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 23 Ağustos 2013. https://www.ejiltalk.org/can-the-icc prosecute-for-use-of-chemical- weapons-in-syria/ (Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2020).
  • ALAMUDDIN, Amal / WEBB, Philippa. “Expanding Jurisdiction over War Crimes underArticle 8 of the ICC Statute”. Journal of International Criminal Justice 8. Oxford University Press, 2010, ss. 1219-1243.
  • ALLEN, Kara / SPENCE, Scott / LEAL, Rocío Escauriaza. “Chemical and Biological Weapons Use in the Rome Statute: A Case for Change”, Vertic Brief, 14 February 2011.
  • ASLAN, M. Yasin. Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi, Ankara: Bilge Yayınevi, 2017.
  • ASLAN, M. Yasin. Teoride ve Uygulamada Savaş Suçları, Ankara: Bilge Yayınevi, 2016
  • AUST, Anthony. Modern Treaty Law and Practice, 2nd Edition, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • CAŞIN, Mesut Hakkı. Modern Uluslararası Hukukun Temel Esasları, Cilt I, Legal, İstanbul: 2013.
  • CLARK, Roger S. “Building on Article 8(2)(b)(xx) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Weapons and Methods of Warfare”, New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal , Vol. 12, No. 3 (Summer 2009), University of California Press, ss. 366-389.
  • CRAWFORD, James. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, Eighth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2012.
  • CRYER, Robert. “Commentary on the Rome Statute for an Internatıonal Criminal Court: A Cadenza for the Song of Those Who Died in Vain?”, Journal of Armed Conflict Law, December 1998, Vol. 3, No. 2 (December 1998), ss. 271-286, Oxford University Press.
  • CRYER, Robert / FRİMAN, Hakan / ROBİNSON, Darryl / WİLMSHURST, Elizabeth. An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • ÇELİK, Edip F. Milletlerarası Hukuk Birinci Kitap, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul: 1984.
  • DÖRMANN, Knut. Elements of War Crimes Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Sources and Commentary, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • DÖRR, Oliver / SCHMALENBACH, Kirsten. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, 2nd Edition, Springer, 2018.
  • DUBLER, Robert / KALYK, Matthew. Crimes against Humanity in the 21st Century Law, Practice and Threats to International Peace and Security, Brill/Nijhoff, Leiden; Boston: 2018.
  • ERDAL, Selcen. Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesinin Devlet Egemenliğine Etkisi, Güncellenmiş ve Gözden Geçirilmiş 2. Baskı, Ankara: Adalet Yayınevi, 2018.
  • FITZMAURİCE, Malgosia / ELIAS, Olufemi / MERKOURIS, Panos. Treaty interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 years on. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.
  • GARDINER, Richard. Treaty Interpretation, Oxford University Press, New York, 2011.
  • GEIß, Robin. “Poison, Gas and Expanding Bullets: The Extension of the List of Prohibited Weapons at the Review Conference of the International Criminal Court in Kampala”, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Volume 13, Cambridge University Press/Springer, 2010, ss. 337-352.
  • GÜNDÜZ, Aslan. “Ege Denizi Kıta Sahanlığı Davası ve Bazı Düşünceler”, Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, Yıl 1983, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, ss. 11-23.
  • HELLER, Kevin Jon. “The Rome Statute Does Not Criminalise Chemical and Biological Weapons”, OpinioJuris, 05.11.2015. http://opiniojuris.org/2015/ 11/05/why-the-rome-statute-does-not-criminalise-chemical-and-biological- weapons/ (Erişim Tarihi: 01.07.2020).
  • HENCKAERTS, Jean-Marie / DOSWALD-BECK, Louise. Customary International Humanitarian Law Volume I: Rules, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • KARATAŞ, Salih. Uluslararası Hukukta Silahsızlanma ve Kimyasal Silahların Yasaklanması Örgütü (OPCW), Legal, İstanbul: 2015.
  • LA HAYE, Eve. War Crimes in International Armed Conflict, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008
  • LEPARD, Brian D. Customary International Law A New Theory with Practical Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • MBENGUE, Makane Moise. “Rules of Interpretation (Article 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties)”, ICSID Review, Vol. 31, No. 2 (2016), ss. 388-412.
  • MORTENSON, Julian Davis. “The Travaux of Travaux: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History?”, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 107: 780-822, 2013.
  • ÖNOK, R. Murat. Tarihî Perspektifiyle Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi, Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi, 2003.
  • RIS, Martin. “Treaty Interpretation and ICJ Recourse to Travaux Préparatoires: Towards a Proposed Amendment of Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties”, Boston College International Comperative Law Review, Volume 14, Issue 1, Article &, 12-1-1991.
  • SCHABAS, William A. Genocide in International Law – The Crime of Crimes, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  • SCHABAS, William A. “Chemical Weapons: Is it a Crime?”, Phd Stıdies in Human Rights, 29 Nisan 2013. http://humanrightsdoctorate.blogspot.com/ 2013/04/chemical-weapons-is-it-crime.html (Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2020).
  • SHAW, Malcom N. Uluslararası Hukuk. Sekizinci Baskı, Çeviri Editörü: İbrahim Kaya, Çevirenler: Yücel Acer, İbrahim Kaya, M. Turgut Demirtepe, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi, Ankara: 2018.
  • SHIRLOW, Esmé / WAIBEL, Michael. “A Sliding Scale Approach to Travaux in Treaty Interpretation: The Case of Investment Treaties”, British Yearbook of International Law, March 2021.
  • SINCLAIR, Sir Ian. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd Edition, Manchester University Press, 1984.
  • STAHN, Carsten. A Critical Introduction to International Criminal Law, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
  • STRYDOM, Hennie. “Prohibited Weapons and the Means and Methods of Warfare in the Rome Statute”. South African Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 35 (2010): 97-110.
  • SUR, Melda. Uluslararası Hukukun Esasları, Gözden Geçirilmiş 11. Baskı, Beta, İstanbul: 2017.
  • TRAPP, Ralf. “The Investigation Into the Islamic State and Chemical Weapons”, Just Security, 27 Ekim 2015. https://www.justsecurity.org/27116/ investigation-islamic-state-chemical-weapons/ (Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2020).
  • UYSAL, Gizem. Nüremberg Mahkemesi’nden Uluslararası Ceza Mahke- mesi’ne Savaş Suçları, Ankara: Yetkin, 2020.
  • ÜLGEN, Mert. The Role of International Criminal Court on Universal Jurisdiction in Terms of Genocide, Der Yayınları, İstanbul: 2018.
  • VIERUCCİ, Luisa, “Obligation to Prosecute CBRN-Related International Crimes”, International Law and Chemical, Biological, Radio-Nuclear (CBRN) Events, Chapter 32, 2022, Brill | Nijhoff, ss. 579-598.
  • WALDOCK, Sir Humphrey. Third report on the law of treaties, Document A/CN.4/167 and Add.1-3, Yearbook of the International Law Comission, 1964, Vol. II.
  • WHITING, Alex. “The International Criminal Court, the Islamic State, and Chemical Weapons”, Just Security, 4 Kasım 2015. https://www.justsecurity.org/27359/icc-islamic-state-chemical-weapons/ (Erişim Tarihi: 01.07.2020).
  • YAĞMUROĞLU, Ozan. “Kimyasal Silahlara Yönelik Olarak Alınan Önlemlerin Kimyasal Silahlar Sözleşmesi Perspektifinde Değerlendirilmesi”, Afet ve Risk Dergisi, 3(2), 2020, ss. 125-142.
  • ZIMMERMANN, Andreas/ŞENER, Meltem. “Chemical Weapons and the International Criminal Court”. The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 108, No. 3 (July 2014), ss. 436-448.
  • 1993 tarihli Kimyasal Silahların Geliştirilmesinin, Üretiminin, Stoklan- masının ve Kullanımının Yasaklanması ve Bunların İmhası ile İlgili Sözleşme. Resmi Gazete, Tarih: 3 Mayıs 1997, Sayı: 22978. https://www.resmiga- zete.gov.tr/arsiv/22978_1.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 31.03.2021).
  • Belgium, Draft Amendments to the Rome Statute on War Crimes, 29 September 2009. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2009/CN.733.2009- Eng.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 04.11.2021).
  • Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with commentaries, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1966, vol. II, s. 220. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/1_1_1966.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 30.12.2019).
  • ICRC, Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law, War Crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Their Source in International Humanitarian Law, Comparative Table.
  • https://www.icrc.org/en/document/war-crimes-under-rome-statute- international-criminal-court-and-their-source-international (Erişim Tarihi: 07.11.2021).
  • ICJ Reports, “Ambatielos Case (Merits: Obligation to Arbitrate)”, Judgment of July 1st, 1952, p. 28.
  • ICJ Reports, “Competence of the General Assembly for the Admission of a State to the United Nations”, Advisory Opinion, 1950, p. 4.
  • ICJ Reports, “Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Iceland)”, Jurisdiction of the Court, Judgment, 1973, p. 3.
  • ICJ Reports, “Aegean Sea Continental Shelf (Greece v. Turkey)”, Judgment, 1978, p. 3.
  • ICJ Reports, “Conditions of Admission of a State to Membership in the United Nations (Article 4 of the Charter)”, Advisory Opinion of May 28th, 1948, p. 57.
  • ICJ Reports, “Legal Consequences for States of the Contitiued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276” (1970), Adrisory Opinion, 1971, p. 16.
  • ICTY, Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic a/k/a “DULE”, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction. https://www.icty.org/x/cases/ tadic/acdec/en/51002.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2020).
  • International Criminal Court, 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2011. https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs- eng.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2020).
  • International Criminal Court, Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Draft resolution amending article 8 of the Rome Statute, RC/WGOA/1/Rev.2, 4 June 2010, Kampala. https://asp.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/234A4C10-5526-4F4E-8C36- A37A7D91D963/0/RCWGOA1Rev2ENG.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2020).
  • International Criminal Court, Review Conference of the Rome Statute, Resolutions, ICC-ASP/8/Res.6, s. 4. https://asp.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/ Resolutions/ICC-ASP-8-Res.6-ENG.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2020).
  • International Criminal Court, Elements of Crimes, The Hague, 2013, s. 18. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/Publications/Elements-of-Crimes.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.11.2022).
  • Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice. Series A.-No. 70 September 7th, 1927 Collection of Judgements the Case of the S.S. "Lotus".
  • Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Yasama, İhtisas Komisyonları, İnsan Hakları İnceleme Komisyonu, Mevzuat, Uluslararası Ceza Divanı Roma Statüsü. https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/komisyon/insanhaklari/mevzuat_CDRS.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2021).
  • United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, First and Second Sessions Vienna, 26 March- 24 May 1968 and 9 April- 22 May 1969, A/CONF.39/C.l/L.l56, Official Records, Document of the Conference, United Nations, New York, 1971.
  • United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, Report of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, A/CONF.183/ 2/Add.1, 14 April 1998. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/253772#record-files- collapse-header (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021).
  • United Nations, Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, 1972. https://front.un-arm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ BWC-text-English.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2021).
  • United Nations, Office for Disarmament Affairs, Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare, 1925. https://www.un.org/disarmament/ wmd/bio/1925-geneva-protocol/ (Erişim Tarihi: 30.06.2020).
  • United Nations, Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, Treaty Series, vol. 1155, p. 331. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/ conventions/1_1_1969.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2021).
  • United States Treaty Collection, Depositary, Status of Treaties, 10. a Amendment to article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Kampala, 10 June 2020. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src= TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVIII-10-a&chapter=18&clang=_en (01.04.2021).
  • Viyana Andlaşmalar Hukuku Sözleşmesi. BM Enfermasyon Merkezi UNIC-Ankara. http://80.251.40.59/politics.ankara.edu.tr/altipar/Okuma/Viyana %20Andlasmalar%20Hukuku%2069.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2021).
Türk-Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2687-3923
  • Başlangıç: 2019
  • Yayıncı: Türk-Alman Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

5977 Sayılı Biyogüvenlik Kanunu Kapsamında Temel Esaslar ve Hukuki Sorumluluk

Beşir Fatih DOĞAN, Esra IŞIKTAŞ

Edinilmiş Mallara Katılma Rejiminden Doğan Mal Gruplarında Konjonktürel ve Endüstriyel Değer Artışı

Esra Bahar KAYA

Altyapı Projelerinde Analitik Uyuşmazlık Çözümü

Hartmut HAMANN, Olesya BULKA

Almanya’da Yardımlı İntihar

Derya Nur KAYACAN

Taşıma Senedi ile Yük Senedine İlişkin Türk Ticaret Kanunu Hükümlerinin Alman Ticaret Kanunu Hükümleriyle Karşılaştırmalı Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Ahmet Batuhan OYAL

1998 Tarihli Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemesi Roma Statüsü’nün Konu Bakımından Yargı Yetkisine İlişkin Hükümlerinin Kimyasal Silahlar Açısından Yorumlanması

Mustafa UÇAR