COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL AND ANATOMICAL STUDIES ON Iris peshmeniana Güner & T. Hall. AND Iris aucheri (Baker) Sealy (IRIDACEAE)

Bu çalışmada, Iris L. cinsinin Scorpiris Spach altcinsinde (Juno iris) morfolojik olarak benzer iki türün (Iris peshmeniana Güner & T. Hall. ve Iris aucheri (Baker) Sealy) morfolojik ve anatomik özellikleri belirlendi ve iki tür arasındaki benzerlikler ve farklılıklar tartışıldı. Iris peshmeniana Türkiye’ye endemiktir ve tükenme tehlikesi altında olduğundan onun yayılış alanı koruma altındadır. Iris aucheri Türkiye’ye endemik değildir ve ülkede sınırlı bir yayılışa sahiptir. Türlerin kök, skap ve yapraklarından enine kesitler, yapraklardan yüzeysel kesitler alındı. Toplanan ve elde edilen örneklerin anatomik ve morfolojik değerlendirmeleri, bitki boyu, yaprak sayısı, eni ve boyu, periant tüp boyu, dış tepal boyu, iç tepal yapısı, kapsül boyu ve eni, brakte ve brakteol boyu, stilus parçalarının boyu ve tohumların testa yapısı ve eksoderma ve korteks tabakalarının sayısı, korteks parankima hücrelerinin kenar yapısı, kök merkezi silindirin yapısı, ksilem kol sayısı, alt epidermadaki mikropapillaların durumu, palizat ve sünger parankimanın tabaka sayısı ve sklerenkima kümesinin durumundaki farklılıklarla ortaya çıkarıldı. Morfolojik ve anatomik özelliklerdeki bazı farklılıklara rağmen, bu çalışmada ortaya konan benzer morfolojik ve anatomik özelliklere dayanarak I. peshmeniana’nın I. aucheri’nin alttürü olabileceği öne sürülmüştür.

COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL AND ANATOMICAL STUDIES ON Iris peshmeniana Güner & T. Hall. AND Iris aucheri (Baker) Sealy (IRIDACEAE)

In this study, morphological and anatomical features of two morphologically similar species (Iris peshmeniana Güner & T. Hall. and Iris aucheri (Baker) Sealy) within the Scorpiris Spach subgenus (Juno iris) of the genus Iris L. were determined and similarities and differences between the two species were discussed. Iris peshmeniana is endemic to Turkey and its spreading area is protected because of exctinction threat. Iris aucheri is not endemic to Turkey and it has a limited distribution in the country. The cross-sections from root, scape and leaves and surface-sections from leaves of species were taken. Anatomical and morphological evaluations of the collected and obtained samples revealed differences in plant size, leaf number, width and length, periant tube length, fall length, standard structure, capsule length and width, bract and bracteole structure, length of style branches and testa structure of seeds and in the number of exoderma and cortex layers, margin structure of cortex paranchyma cells, structure of the root center cylinder, xylem strand number, status micropapillae in lower epiderma, layer number of palisade and spongy parenchyma and status of sclerenchyma cap. Although there were some differences in morphological and anatomical features, based on similar anatomical and morphological features revealed in the present study, it has been suggested that I. peshmeniana may be a subspecies of I. aucheri.

Keywords:

Scorpiris taxa, morphology anatomy,

PDF

___

1. Baytop, T. 1999. Used Medicine Plants in Turkey, pp.137-370. In: (Baytop, T.). Therapy with Plant In Turkey (Past and Present). Nobel Medicine Bookstores, İstanbul, 480 pp.
2. Boltenkov, E.V. 2016. Typification and nomenclatural notes on twenty-eight names of Juno irises (Iridaceae) from Central and South Asian. Phytotaxa, 260: 223-234.
3. Celep, A. 2011. An Anatomical Study On the Genus Iris L. Subgenus Scorpiris Spach. Species Growing in Turkey. Master Thesis. Selcuk University, Science Institute, Konya, 54 pp.
4. Crespo, M.B., Martínez-Azorín, M. & Mavrodiev, E.V. 2015. Can a rainbow consist of a single colour? A new comprehensive generic arrangement of the ‘Iris sensu latissimo’ clade (Iridaceae), congruent with morphology and molecular data. Phytotaxa, 232: 1-78.
5. Çelebioğlu, S. & Baytop, T. 1949. A New Reagent For Microscopical Investigation of Plant. Publication of the Institute of Pharmacognosy, İstanbul, 301 pp.
6. Dönmez, E.O. & Pınar, N.M. 2001. The clypeate polen grains of Turkish Iris (Iridaceae): Subgenus Scorpiris Spach. Turkish Journal of Botany, 25: 57-62.
7. Fang, R., Houghton, P.J. & Hylands, R.L. 2008. Cytotoxic effects of compounds from Iris tectorum on human cancer cell lines. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 118: 257-263. 8. Gontova, T.N. & Zatylnikova, O.A. 2013. Comparative morphological and anatomical study of leaves and stems of Iris pseudocorus and Iris sibirica. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Ssiences, 5: 574-578.
9. Guo, J. & Wilson, C.A. 2013. Molecular phylogenetic study of the crested Iris based on five plastid markers. Systematic Botany, 38: 987-995.
10. Guo, J. 2015. Mechanisms for the evolution of complex and diversely elaborated sepals in Iris identified by comparative analysis of developmental sequences. American Jornal of Botany, 102: 819-832.
11. Güner, A. 2012. Iris L., pp. 535-540. In: Aslan, S., Ekim, T., Vural, M & Babaç M.T. List of Turkey Plants (Vascular Pants), Publication of Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanic Garden and Floristic Research Society, Istanbul, 1290 pp.
12. Hall, T., Tillie, N. & Chase, M.W. 2001. A re-evalution of the bulbous Irises. Annual of Botany, n.s. Volume 58: 123-126.
13. Kandemir, N. 2015. Leaf anatomical properties of some rare and endemic Iris L. taxa and their reletions: Subgenus Hermodactyloides in Turkey. The Iranian Journal of Botany, 21: 142-151.
14. Kandemir, N. & Yakupoğlu, H. 2016. Morphological and anatomical properties of endemic Iris nezahatiae distributed in the North-East Anatolia region (Turkey). Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science, 5: 104-112.
15. Kandemir, N. & Çelik, A. 2017. Comparison of morphological and anatomical properties of endangered endemic Iris pamphylica and I. masia in Turkey. Acta Botanica Hungarica, 59: 371-388.
16. Kandemir, N., Çelik, A., Ullah F., Shah, S.N. & Zaman, W. 2019. Foliar epidermal anatomical characteristics of taxa of Iris subg. Scorpiris Spach (Iridaceae) from Turkey. Microscopy Research & Technique, 82: 764-774.
17. Kukula-Koch, W., Sieniawska, E., Widelski, J., Urjin, O., Głowniak, P. & Skalicka-Woźniak, K. 2015. Major secondary metabolites of Iris spp. Phytochemical Review, 14: 51-80.
18. Makarevitch, I., Golvonina, K., Scherbik, S. & Blinov, A. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of the Siberian Iris species inferred from noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences. International Journal of Plant Science, 164: 229–237.
19. Mathew, B. 1984. Iris L., 382-410. In: Davis, P.H. (eds). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 8. Edinburg University, Edinburg, 632 pp.
20. Mathew, B. 2001. Some aspects of the Juno group of irises. Annual of Botany, Special Volume: 113-122.
21. Mesdner, H. & Mansfield, T.A. 1968. Physiolgy of stomata. McGraw-Hill., London, 144 pp.
22. Mitic, B., Nicolic, T. & Liber, Z. 2000. Morphological and anatomical relationships in Alpine-Dinaric populations of the genus Iris L. Pallidae series (A. Kern.) Trinajstic (Iridaceae). Acta Societatis Botanicorum. Poloniae, 69: 285-291.
23. Nicolic, T. & Mitic, B. 1991. Phenotic relationships within populations of Iris illyrica, Iris palliida and Iris pseudopallida (Iridaceae) with regard to morphological characteristics of epidermis. Acta Botanica Croatica, 50: 99-106.
24. Rudall, P.1991. Leaf anatomy in Tigridieae (Iridaceae). Plant Systematic Evolution, 175: 1-10.
25. Rudall, P. & Mathew, B. 1993. Leaf anatomy of the bulbous Irises. Botanische Jahrbücher, 115: 63-76.
26. Sabrin, I., Gamal, M. & Nawal, M. 2012. New constituents from the rhizomes of Egyptian Iris germanica L. Molecules, 17: 2587-2598.
27. Tillie, N., Chase, M.W. & Hall, T. 2000. Molecular studies in the genus Iris L.: a preliminary study. Irises and Iridaceae. Annals of Botany, 58: 105-112.
28. Usta, E. 2002. Classification of Turkish Iris L. (Iridaceae) By Phenetic Methods. Doctoral Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Science Institute, Ankara, 144 pp.
29. Wilson, C.A. 2009. Phylogenetic relationships among the recognized series in Iris section Limniris. Systematic Botany, 34: 277–284.
30. Wilson, C.A. 2011. Subgeneric classification in Iris re-examined using chloroplast sequence data.Taxon, 60: 27-35.