Klinik okült meme lezyonlarında spesmen radyografilerinin etkinliği
Amaç: Klinik okült meme lezyonlarında cerrahi sonrası elde edilen spesmen radyografilerinin etkinliği araştırıldı. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamızda çeşitli meme yakınmaları nedeniyle yapılan mamografi ya da ultrasonografi tetkiklerinde saptanan lezyonlara yönelik stereotaksi ve ultrasonografi eşliğinde işaretleme yapılan 215 olguda (ort. yaş 48.64±8.4; dağılım 28-75) cerrahi eksizyon sonrası elde edilen spesmen radyografileri değerlendirildi. İşaretleme 59 olguda (%27.4) ultrasonografi, 156 olguda (%72.6) stereotaksi rehberliğinde yapıldı. Sonuçlar histopatolojik tanılarla karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Üç olgu dışında tüm olgularda spesmen radyografilerinin lezyonları gösterebildiği görüldü. Lezyonların gösterilemediği bu üç olgunun kontrol mamografilerinde memede lezyon saptanmadı. Sonuç: Spesmen radyografileri klinik okült meme lezyonlarının cerrahi olarak çıkarılıp çıkarılmadığını saptamada güvenilir bir yöntemdir.
The efficacy of specimen radiography in clinically occult breast lesions
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of specimen radiography for clinically occult breast lesions. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated specimen radiographs of 215 patients (mean age 48.64±8.4 years; range 28 to 75 years) whose lesions were detected by mammography and/or ultrasonography and localized by wire. Preoperative wire localization was performed under the guidance of ultrasonography in 59 cases (27.4%) and stereotactically in 156 cases (72.6%). The findings of specimen radiography were compared with those of histopathologic examination. Results: Specimen radiographs showed lesions in all but three cases. In these three cases, no breast lesions were found in control mammographies. Conclusion: Breast biopsy specimen radiography is a safe method to ensure complete excision of clinically occult breast lesions.
___
- 1) Walker TM, Horton LW, Williams RM. Impalpable breast lesions: marking of surgical specimens for pathology.Clin Radiol 1992;45:179-80.
- 2) Homer MJ, Pile-Spellman ER. Needle localization of occult breast lesions with a curved-end retractable wire: technique and pitfalls. Radiology 1986;161:547-8.
- 3) Lindfors KK, Lott SA, Alberhasky MT. A new device for evaluation of biopsy specimens of occult breast-lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:261-3.
- 4) Samuels T, Kerenyi N, Taylor G, Savilo E, Ehrlich L. Practical aspects of mammographic-pathological correlation: experience with needle localization. Can Assoc Radiol J 1990;41:127-9.
- 5) Kopans DB. “Early” breast cancer detection using techniques other than mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:465-8.
- 6) Alberhasky MT. Mammographic and gross pathologic analysis of breast needle localization specimens. Use of a tissue analysis device. Am J Clin Pathol 1989;92:452-7.
- 7) Gent HJ, Sprenger E, Dowlatshahi K. Stereotaxic needle localization and cytological diagnosis of occult breast lesions. Ann Surg 1986;204:580-4.
- 8) Hall JA, Murphy DC, Hall BR, Hall KA. Mammographic abnormalities and the detection of carcinoma of the breast. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168(6 Pt 1):1677-80.
- 9) Rebner M, Pennes DR, Baker DE, Adler DD, Boyd P. Two-view specimen radiography in surgical biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:283-5.
- 10) Farmer E, Kirkpatrick AE, Forrest AP. Specimen radiology of excised breast lesions. Br J Surg 1986;73:756-7.
- 11) Rose A, Osborne J, Wright G, Billson V. Is what you see what you get? Breast specimen handling re-visited. Australas Radiol 1991;35:145-7.
- 12) Graham RA, Homer MJ, Sigler CJ, Safaii H, Schmid CH, Marchant DJ, et al. The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:33-6.
- 13) Bauermeister DE, Hall MH. Specimen radiography-a mandatory adjunct to mammography. Am J Clin Pathol 1973;59:782-9.
- 14) Azzopardi JG. Problems in breast pathology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1979.
- 15) Frank HA, Hall FM, Steer ML. Preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions demonstrated by mammography. N Engl J Med 1976;295:259-60.
- 16) Taveras JM, Ferrucci JT. Radiology: diagnosis, imaging, intervention. Vol 1. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co.; 1994.
- 17) Stomper PC, Davis SP, Sonnenfeld MR, Meyer JE, Greenes RA, Eberlein TJ. Efficacy of specimen radiography of clinically occult noncalcified breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:43-7.
- 18) Rosen PP, Snyder RE, Robbins G. Specimen radiography for nonpalpable breast lesions found by mammography: procedures and results. Cancer 1974;34:2028-33.
- 19) Meyer JE, Kopans DB, Stomper PC, Lindfors KK. Occult breast abnormalities: percutaneous preoperative needle localization. Radiology 1984;150:335-7.
- 20) Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:661-3.
- 21) Hayashi N, Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Senda M, Yamamoto K, Torizuka K, et al. Real-time sonography of palpable breast masses. Br J Radiol 1985;58:611-5.
- 22) Aitken RJ, MacDonald HL, Kirkpatrick AE, Anderson TJ, Chetty U, Forrest AP. Outcome of surgery for non-palpable mammographic abnormalities. Br J Surg 1990;77:673-6.
- 23) Eastgate RJ, Gilchrist KW, Matallana RH. Enhancement of tissue structure visualization in breast specimen radiography. Radiology 1979;132:744-6.
- 24) Rubio IT, Mirza N, Sahin AA, Whitman G, Kroll SS, Ames FC, et al. Role of specimen radiography in patients treated with skin-sparing mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:544-8.
- 25) Ciccarelli G, Di Virgilio MR, Menna S, Garretti L, Ala A, Giani R, et al. Radiography of the surgical specimen in early stage breast lesions: diagnostic reliability in the analysis of the resection margins. Radiol Med (Torino) 2007;112:366-76.
- 26) Mazouni C, Rouzier R, Balleyguier C, Sideris L, Rochard F, Delaloge S, et al. Specimen radiography as predictor of resection margin status in non-palpable breast lesions. Clin Radiol 2006;61:789-96.