Suriyeli Kadın Mültecilerin Aile İçi Şiddeti Raporlamalarının Önündeki Engeller: Türkiye'deki Suriyeli Kadın Mültecilere İlişkin Bir Örnek Olay

Bu çalışma, Suriyeli sığınmacı kadınların aile içi şiddet türleri ve bu şiddetle nasıl baş ettiklerini incelemektedir. Çalışmanın odak noktası, Suriyeli sığınmacı kadınların şiddete maruz kaldıklarında resmi kurumlardan veya kuruluşlardan yardım aramama nedenlerini belirlemektir. Araştırmada nitel yöntem kullanılmış olup, Ankara’daki 20 Suriyeli sığınmacı kadınla derinlemesine görüşme yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, kadınlar eşleri tarafından farklı şiddet türlerine maruz kalmışlardır. Şiddetle başa çıkmak için, kadınlar sakinleştirme stratejileri kullanmaktadırlar. Sosyo-kültürel faktörlerin yanı sıra, şiddetle ve kadınların algılarıyla, sunulan hizmetlerle ve iltica koşulları ile ilgili ve benzeri faktörler kadınların resmi kurumlardan yardım aramama nedenleridir. Araştırmada, Suriyeli sığınmacı kadınlara kadın hakları, kadına yönelik şiddet, aile içi şiddet ve onun sağlık ve sosyal etkileri hakkında farkındalık programlarının artırılması önerilmiştir.

Barriers to Reporting Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) by Syrian Women Refugees: A Case Study of Syrian Women Refugees in Turkey

This study investigates the forms of intimate partner violence (IPV) that Syrian refugee women are subjected to. It also examines the strategies that are used to deal with IPV. The main focus of the study is to determine the reasons that prevent Syrian women refugees from seeking formal help. The study use qualitative method, the data were gathered using an in-depth semi-structured interview with 20 married Syrian refugees in Ankara. The study found that most of the women were subjected to all forms of IPV. It also found that the women used Placating strategy to deal with IPV. Moreover, it also discovered that five main factors hinder women from seeking help or talking about IPV with specialists. These factors are socio-culture factors, factors related to the nature of violence, factors related to women's perceptions, factors related to services provided, and factors related to asylum conditions. The study recommended the need to increase awareness programs for Syrian refugee women about women's rights, violence against women, as well as health and social consequences of IPV.

___

  • Erdoğan, M. (2014). Syrians ın Turkey: social acceptance and integration, Hacettepe University Center for Migration and Politics Research.
  • Özden, Ş. and Ramadan, O. (2019). Suriyeli kadınların Türkiye’de yaşama bakışları: Haklar, toplumsal ilişkiler ve sivil toplum, Badael, İstanbul,Türkiye.
  • Tppis et al (2012). Domestic violence among Iraqi refugees in Syria, Health Care for Women International.
  • Rees,S.(2004).Human rights and the significance of psychosocial and cultural issues in domestic violence policy and intervention for refugee women, Australian Journal of Human Rights. Kurg et al (2002). World report on violence and health, World Health Organization, Geneva.
  • Colson, E. (1995). War and domestic violence, Cult Surv Q, 1995 Spring:8-35.
  • Guruge et al (2017). Intimate partner violence in the postwar context: Women’s experiences and community leaders’ perceptions in the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka, PLOS One 12(3).
  • Al-Natour et al (2019). Marital Violence during war conflict: The Lived Experience of Syrian Refugee Women, Journal of Transcultural Nursing 2019, Vol. 30(1) 32–38.
  • Al-Modallal et al (2015). Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Among Women Visiting Health Care Centers in Palestine Refugee Camps in Jordan, Health Care for Women International, 36:2, 137-148.
  • Daniel H. (2014). Overview of Qualitative Research, Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 20:109- 122.
  • Michal et al (2021). Designing in-depth semi-structured interviews for revealing meaning reconstruction after loss, Death Studies, Volume 45, Issue 2 (2021),
  • Longhurst, R. (2009). Interviews: In-Depth, Semi-Structured, International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, (2009) p.580-584,
  • Rose, L. and Campbell, J. (2000). The role of social support and family relationships in women’s responses to battering. Health Care for Women International, 2000 (21)1 p. 27-39.
  • Asku K, I. (2018). War hits the Women: Marriage as Syrian Women's Coping Mechanism and lts Impact on Turkish Women, Turkish Studies, 2018, V13:7, 31-45.
  • Haj-Yahia, M. (2005). Can people's patriarchal ideology predict their beliefs about wife abuse? The case of Jordanian men. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(5), 545-567.
  • Al-Shdayfat,N. (2017). Emotional Abuse among Syrian Refugee Women in Jordan, Global Journal of Health Science; Vol. 9, No. 3; 2017.
  • Mac-Tavish, E. (2016). Barriers of Reporting Sexual Violence in Syrian Refugee Camps, MA in Human Security and Peace building, Royal Roads University Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, ProQuest Number: 10239637 10239637.
  • Usta et al. (2008). Women, War, and Violence: Surviving the Experience, Journal of Women Health, V:17, 793-804, November 5, 2008.
  • Claudia et al (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Abu-Ras, W. (2003). Barriers to Services for Arab Immigrant Battered Women in a Detroit Suburb, Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation, Vol. 4, No. l, 49-66, 2003.
  • Haj- Yahia,M. (2002), Attitudes of Arab women toward different patterns of coping with wife abuse, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Volume(17), 721-745. July 2002.
  • Al-Shdayfat, N. Hatamleh, R. (2017). Syrian refugee women’s reasons for not reporting violence: An Exploratory Study, International Journal of Nursing Education, October-December 2017 .
  • Vatnar, S.and Bjørkly, S. (2008). An Interactional Perspective of Intimate Partner Violence: An Indepth Semi-structured Interview of a Representative Sample of Help-seeking Women. Journal of Family Violence volume V(23),p.265–279.
  • Gizzi, M. and Rädiker, S. (2021). The practice of qualitative data analysis research examples using MAXQDA.MAXQDA Press, Berlin 2021, 1st edition.
  • Kuckartz, U. and Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA: text, audio, and video, Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.
  • Glaser, B. Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory strategies for qualitative research, Aldine Publishing, Chicago.
  • Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Fourth Edition, Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Kapilashrami, A. and Alsaba, K. (2016). Understanding women’s experience of violence and the political economy of gender in conflict: the case of Syria, Reproductive Health Matters, 24:47, 5-17,
  • Aswad, B. and Gray, N. (1996). Challenges to the Arab-American family and access. İn book Family and gender among American Muslims: Issuesfacing Middle Eastern immigrants and their descendants, p(223-240), Temple University Press, Philadelphia, The United states.
  • Directorate General of Migration Management (2021). Temporary Protection up to date statistics.https://en.goc.gov.tr/temporary-protection27 (Accessed May, 2021).
  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence, Switzerland,Geneva.
  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022256 (Accessed May, 2021).
  • United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) (2016). More than Numbers: Responding to genderbased violence in the Syria Crisis. https://arabstates.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resourcepdf/unfpa%20gbv%20take10-may17-single%5B4%5D%5B1%5D_0.pdf. (Accessed June, 2021).
  • ORSAM and TESEV. (2015). SuriyelisığınmacılarınTürkiye’yeetkileri. ORSAM report No(195), January 2015. https://orsam.org.tr//d_hbanaliz/201518_rapor195tur.pdf(Accessed June, 2021).
  • Human Rights Watch (HRW) (2000). Seeking protection: Addressing sexual and domestic violence in Tanzania’s refugee camps. Human Right Watch, October 2000, New York, The United State of America. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2000/tanzania/. (Accessed 11 May, 2021).
  • Human Rights Watch. (2006). A question of security: Violence against women and girls, Human Right Watch, November 2006, New York, The United State of America. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/opt1106webwcover_0.pdf. (Accessed 11 May, 2021).
  • UN Women (2013). Gender based violence and child protection among Syrian refugees in Jordan; Interagency assessment. Queen Zein Al-Sharaf Institute for Development (ZENID).https://jordan.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2013/7/gender basedviolence-and-child-protection-among-syrian-refugees-in-jordan
  • Amnesty International. (2004). Lives blown apart: Crimes against women in times of conflict stop violence against women, Amnesty International Publications, 2004, London,United Kingdom.https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/88000/act770752004en.pd
  • Cultural Orientation Resource Center. (2014) Refugees from Syria. http://www.culturalorientation.net/library/publications/refugees-from-syria (Accessed 11 May, 2021).
  • Human Right Watch (2021). https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/media_2021/01/2021_hrw_world_report.pdf.(Accesse d June, 2021).
Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-3374
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2000
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi