Sulkus vokalis tedavisinde tiroplastinin yeri

Amaç: Bu çalışmada sulkus vokalisin düzeltilmesiiçin tiroplasti ameliyatı yapılan hastalarda ameliyatsonrası objektif ve subjektif ses değerlendirme sonuçları incelendi.Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya sulkus vokalisnedeniyle tiroplasti ameliyatı yapılan altı hasta alındı. Sesdeğerlendirmeleri ameliyattan bir hafta önce ve iki aysonra yapıldı. Hastaların hiçbirine ameliyat sonrasıdönemde ses değerlendirmeleri öncesinde ses terapisi uygulanmadı. Ortalama takip süresi 14.8 aydı.Bulgular: Ameliyat öncesi ile karşılaştırıldığında,VHI voice handicap index skorlarında anlamlıdeğişiklik görüldü p=0.002 . Disfoni şiddet indeksiskoru ise, ameliyat öncesine göre anlamlı farklılıkgöstermedi p=0.810 .Sonuç: Bu çalışmada hastaların seslerinde objektifdüzelmeden ziyade subjektif düzelme olduğu görüldü.Bulgularımız, ses hastalarının değerlendirilmesindebaşarının sadece objektif ölçütlere dayandırılamayacağını, aynı zamanda subjektif ölçütlerin de göz önünealınması gerektiğini göstermektedir

The role of thyroplasty in the management of sulcus vocalis

Objectives: The results of objective and subjective evaluation of postoperative vocal function were assessed in patients treated with thyroplasty for the correction of sulcus vocalis. Patients and Methods: Six patients 5 males, 1 female; mean age 26 years; range 18 to 34 years underwent thyroplasty for sulcus vocalis. Voice evaluations were performed one week before and two months after surgery. None of the patients had voice therapy before evaluations in the postoperative period. The mean follow-up period was 14.8 months. Results: Compared to the preoperative values, postoperative voice handicap index scores were significantly different p=0.002 . However, the difference between the dysphonia severity index DSI scores were not significant p=0.810 . Conclusion: A subjective rather than an objective improvement was observed in voice. Our results suggest that, in the evaluation of voice patients, therapeutic success should not be based only on objective criteria, but subjective criteria should also be considered.

___

  • Ford CN, Inagi K, Khidr A, Bless DM, Gilchrist KW. Sulcus vocalis: a rational analytical approach to diag- nosis and management. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:189-200.
  • Pontes P, Behlau M. Treatment of sulcus vocalis: audi- tory perceptual and acoustical analysis of the slicing mucosa surgical technique. J Voice 1993;7:365-76.
  • Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Molenberghs G, Remacle M, Heylen L, Millet B, et al. The dysphonia severity index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a mul- tiparameter approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43:796-809.
  • Benninger MS, Ahuja AS, Gardner G, Grywalski C. Assessing outcomes for dysphonic patients. J Voice 1998;12:540-50.
  • Schutte HK, Seidner W. Recommendation by the Union of European Phoniatricians (UEP): standardiz- ing voice area measurement/phonetography. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1983;35:286-8.
  • Nakayama M, Ford CN, Brandenburg JH, Bless DM. Sulcus vocalis in laryngeal cancer: a histopathologic study. Laryngoscope 1994;104(1 Pt 1):16-24.
  • Benninger MS, Alessi D, Archer S, Bastian R, Ford C, Koufman J, et al. Vocal fold scarring: current concepts and management. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 115:474-82.
  • Chan RW, Titze IR. Viscosities of implantable biomateri- als in vocal fold augmentation surgery. Laryngoscope 1998;108:725-31.
  • Chen YY, Pai L, Lin YS, Wang HW, Hsiung MW. Fat augmentation for nonparalytic glottic insufficiency. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2003;65:176-83.
  • Su CY, Tsai SS, Chiu JF, Cheng CA. Medialization laryngoplasty with strap muscle transposition for vocal fold atrophy with or without sulcus vocalis. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1106-12.
  • Hsiung MW, Kang BH, Pai L, Su WF, Lin YH. Combination of fascia transplantation and fat injection into the vocal fold for sulcus vocalis: long-term results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2004;113:359-66.
  • Sataloff RT, Spiegel JR, Hawkshaw M, Rosen DC, Heuer RJ. Autologous fat implantation for vocal fold scar: a preliminary report. J Voice 1997;11:238-46.