Sirküler trakeal rekonstrüksiyonda farklı yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması: Deneysel çalışma

Amaç: Bu çalışmada sirküler trakeal rekonstrüksiyon için farklı prefabrike modellerin karşılaştırılmasıamaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Otuz adet erişkin dişi Yeni Zelanda tavşanı, farklı doku kombinasyonuyla sirkülertrakeal rekonstrüksiyon için altı gruba ayrıldı. Prefabrike edilmiş trakealarda anastomoz yapılmadı.Vasküler kaynak olarak lateral torasik fasya veyapektoralis majör kası; iskeletsel çatı olarak polipropilen mesh, politetrafloroetilen Gore-Tex veya yüzük kartilajlar kullanıldı. İç yüzey tüysüz epitelyalderi greftinden sağlandı. Gruplar tüysüz epitel greftinin canlılığı, longitüdinal esneklik, dayanıklılık,flep duvar kalınlığı, iç çap ve flep canlılığı açısından karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Polipropilen mesh gruplarında tama yakınepitelyal deri grefti canlılığı görülürken %95-%99 ,Gore-Tex gruplarında tama yakın nekroz gözlendi %74-%71 . Longitüdinal esneklik ve dayanıklılık Gore-Tex ve polipropilen mesh gruplarında normal trakeaya yakın ölçülerde bulundu. Kartilaj greftleri ileprefabrikasyon yapılan gruplar normalden fazla longitüdinal esneklik ve kolayca kollaps gösterdi.Sonuç: İskeletsel çatı olarak polipropilen mesh, vasküler kaynak olarak lateral torasik fasyanın kullanıldığı prefabrike model, sirküler trakea defektlerinin rekonstrüksiyonunda en iyi seçenek olarak görünmektedir

Comparison of different methods of circumferential tracheal reconstruction: an experimental study

Objectives: This study was designed to compare different prefabrication models for circumferential tracheal reconstruction.Materials and Methods: Thirty adult female New Zealand rabbits were divided into six groups for circum­ ferential tracheal reconstruction with a different tissue combination. Prefabrication of neotrachea was per- formed without anastomosis. Lateral thoracic fascia or pectoralis majör muscle were used for vascular supply.Polypropylene mesh, polytetrafluoroethylene Gore- Tex , or cartilage rings were used for skeletal frame- work. Hairless epithelial skin graft was used for inner lin- ing. The groups were compared in terms of viability of hairless epithelial graft, longitudinal flexibility, rigidity, flap wall thickness, internal diameter, and flap viability.Results: Epithelial skin graft was almost totally viable 95%-99% in the polypropylene mesh groups. Gore-Tex groups exhibited almost total necrosis 74%-71% . Longitudinal flexibility and rigidity were similar to the native trachea in Gore-Tex and polypropylene mesh groups. Neotrachea pre- fabricated with cartilage grafts showed more than normal longitudinal flexibility and collapsed easily.Conclusion: The prefabricated model with the use of polypropylene mesh for skeletal framework and lateral thoracic fascia for vascular supply seems to be the best alternative in the reconstruction of circumferential tra­ cheal defects.

___

  • Grillo HC. Circumferential resection and reconstruc- tion of the mediastinal and cervical trachea. Ann Surg 1965;162:374-88.
  • Lykoudis EG, Tsoutsos DA, Papalois AE, Frangia KB, Stamatopoulos CN, Ioannovich JD. Prefabrication of an axial bio-synthetic flap for circumferential tra- cheal defect reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53:508-15.
  • Cavadas PC. Tracheal reconstruction using a free jeju- nal flap with cartilage skeleton: experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:937-42.
  • Delaere PR, Hardillo J, Hermans R, Van Den Hof B. Prefabrication of composite tissue for improved tra- cheal reconstruction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 110:849-60.
  • Belsey R. Resection and reconstruction of the intratho- racic trachea. Br J Surg 1950;38:200-5.
  • Narodick BG, Worman LW, Pemberton AH. Relaxation technique for tracheal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 1965;24:190-6.
  • Fonkalsrud EW, Plested WG. Tracheobronchial recon- struction with autologous periosteum. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1966;52:666-74.
  • Neifeld JP, Theogaraj SD, Mehrhof AI. Reconstruction after mediastinal tracheostomy. Am J Surg 1984;148: 505-8.
  • Yamada A, Harii K, Itoh Y, Kikawada T, Miyashita H. Reconstruction of the cervical trachea with a free fore- arm flap. Br J Plast Surg 1993;46:32-5.
  • Biller HF, Munier MA. Combined infrahyoid and infe- rior constrictor muscle release for tension-free anasto- mosis during primary tracheal repair. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;107:430-3.
  • Shaha A, DiMaio T, Money S, Krespi Y, Jaffe BM. Prosthetic reconstruction of the trachea. Am J Surg 1988;156:306-9.
  • Krizek TJ, Kirchner JA. Tracheal reconstruction with an autogenous mucochondrial graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;50:123-30.
  • Ohlsen L, Nordin U. Tracheal reconstruction with peri- chondrial grafts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;10: 135-45.
  • Friedman M, Mayer AD. Laryngotracheal reconstruction in adults with the sternocleidomastoid myoperiosteal flap. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:897-908.
  • Fleischer A, Khafif R. Reconstruction of the mediasti- nal trachea with a tubed pectoralis major myocuta- neous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:342-6.
  • Papp C, McCraw JB, Arnold PG. Experimental recon- struction of the trachea with autogenous materials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:13-20.
  • Costantino PD, Nuss DW, Snyderman CH, Johnson JT, Friedman CD, Narayanan K, et al. Experimental tra- cheal replacement using a revascularized jejunal auto- graft with an implantable Dacron mesh tube. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992;101:807-14.
  • Ruuskanen MM, Kallioinen MJ, Kaarela OI, Laiho JA, Tormala PO, Waris TJ. The role of polyglycolic acid rods in the regeneration of cartilage from perichondri- um in rabbits. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1991;25:15-8.
  • Fayad J, Kuriloff DB. Prefabricated microvascular autograft in tracheal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;111:396-406.
  • Okumus A, Cizmeci O, Kabakas F, Kuvat SV, Bilir A, Aydin A. Circumferential trachea reconstruction with a prefabricated axial bio-synthetic flap: experimental study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2005;69:335-44.