Obstrüktif uyku apnesi olan hastalarda iki endoskopik muayene yönteminin karşılaştırılması: Müller manevrası ve uyku sırasında fiberoptik farengoskopi

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, obstrüktif uyku apnesi olan hastaların üst havayollarındaki daralma bölgelerini tespitetmek için kullanılan endoskopik muayene yöntemlerinden olan Müller manevrası MM ile uyku sırasındafiberoptik farengoskopi uygulaması karşılaştırıldı.Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Horlama veya obstrüktif uykuapnesi nedeniyle uvulopalatofarengoplasti UPPP yapılan 28 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Tüm hastalarda obstrüksiyon, yumuşak damak ve dil kökü seviyelerinde hemuyanıklıkta hem de uyku sırasında incelenerek derecelendirildi. Hastalara MM oturur ve yatar pozisyonlarda uygulandı; buna ek olarak, tüm hastalara ameliyathanede anestezi indüksiyonu sırasında fiberoptik farengoskopi yapıldı. İki uygulamanın sonuçları karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Pozisyon değişikliği MM sonuçlarında anlamlı değişikliğe yol açmadı. İki yöntem arasında ileriderecede uyumsuzluk olduğu görüldü. Anestezi indüksiyonu sırasındaki fiberoptik farengoskopik incelemede, MM’ye göre özellikle yumuşak damak seviyesindedaha fazla obstrüksiyon saptandı.Sonuç: Obstrüksiyonun MM ile olduğundan dahadüşük derecede değerlendirilebileceği düşünüldü

Comparison of two endoscopic examination methods, the Muller maneuver and fiberoptic pharyngoscopy during sleep, in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Objectives: This study was designed to compare two endoscopic examination methods, the Muller maneu­ ver MM and the fiberoptic pharyngoscopy during sleep, both of which are used to detect obstructed seg- ments in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.Patients and Methods: The study included 28 patients 23 males, 5 females; mean age 44.6 years; range 28 to 59 years who underwent uvu- lopalatopharyngoplasty UPPP for snoring or obstruc­ tive sleep apnea. Obstruction was examined both at the level of soft palate and tongue base while the patients were awake and asleep and was scored. The Muller maneuver was performed in the sitting and supine positions. İn addition, fiberoptic pharyngoscopy was performed right after induction of anesthesia. The results of the two methods were compared.Results: Changes in body position were not associ- ated with significant differences in the results of MM.The two methods were found to be highly discor- dant, in that a greater degree of obstruction was noted especially at the level of the soft palate by fiberoptic pharyngoscopy. Conclusion: İt was concluded that the degree of obstruction might be underestimated by MM.

___

  • Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1230-5.
  • Fujita S, Conway W, Zorick F, Roth T. Surgical correction of anatomic azbnormalities in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1981;89:923-34.
  • Powell N, Riley R, Guilleminault C, Troell R. A reversible uvulopalatal flap for snoring and sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep 1996;19:593-9.
  • Fujita S, Conway WA, Zorick FJ, Sicklesteel JM, Roehrs TA, Wittig RM, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Laryngoscope 1985;95:70-4.
  • Sher AE, Schechtman KB, Piccirillo JF. The efficacy of surgical modifications of the upper airway in adults with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep 1996; 19:156-77.
  • Katsantonis GP, Walsh JK, Schweitzer PK, Friedman WH. Further evaluation of uvulopalatopharyngoplas- ty in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syn- drome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:244-50.
  • Simmons FB, Guilleminault C, Miles LE. The palatopharyngoplasty operation for snoring and sleep apnea: an interim report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984;92:375-80.
  • Rivlin J, Hoffstein V, Kalbfleisch J, McNicholas W, Zamel N, Bryan AC. Upper airway morphology in patients with idiopathic obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1984;129:355-60.
  • Petri N, Suadicani P, Wildschiodtz G, Bjorn-Jorgensen J. Predictive value of Muller maneuver, cephalometry and clinical features for the outcome of uvu- lopalatopharyngoplasty. Evaluation of predictive fac- tors using discriminant analysis in 30 sleep apnea patients. Acta Otolaryngol 1994;114:565-71.
  • Borowiecki BD, Sassin JF. Surgical treatment of sleep apnea. Arch Otolaryngol 1983;109:508-12.
  • Sher AE, Thorpy MJ, Shprintzen RJ, Spielman AJ, Burack B, McGregor PA. Predictive value of Muller maneuver in selection of patients for uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Laryngoscope 1985;95:1483-7.
  • Katsantonis GP, Maas CS, Walsh JK. The predictive effi- cacy of the Muller maneuver in uvulopalatopharyngo- plasty. Laryngoscope 1989;99(7 Pt 1):677-80.
  • Katsantonis GP, Walsh JK. Somnofluoroscopy: its role in the selection of candidates for uvulopalatopharyn- goplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;94:56-60.
  • Camilleri AE, Ramamurthy L, Jones PH. Sleep nasendoscopy: what benefit to the management of snorers? J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:1163-5.
  • Quinn SJ, Daly N, Ellis PD. Observation of the mecha- nism of snoring using sleep nasendoscopy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1995;20:360-4.
  • Croft CB, Pringle M. Sleep nasendoscopy: a technique of assessment in snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1991;16:504-9.
  • Hessel NS, de Vries N. Results of uvulopalatopharyn- goplasty after diagnostic workup with polysomnogra- phy and sleep endoscopy: a report of 136 snoring patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003;260:91-5.
  • Pringle MB, Croft CB. A comparison of sleep nasendoscopy and the Muller manoeuvre. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1991;16:559-62.