___

• Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227–257.
• Berlin, J. A. (1987). Rhetoric and reality: Writing instruction in American colleges, 1900-1985. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Brumfit, C. (1977). Correcting written work. Modern English Teacher 5, 22-23.
• Cohen, A.D., & Cavalcanti, MC. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In. B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 155–177). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Connor, U., & Farmer, F. (1989). The teaching of topical structure analysis as a revision strategy for ESL writers. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 126-139). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Conrad, S.M., & Goldstein, L. M. (1999). ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: text, contexts, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 147–179.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Fathman, A., & Whalley. E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-190). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–339.
• Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155–182.
• Goldstein, L. (2004). Questions and answers about teacher written commentary and student revision: Teachers and students working together. Journal of Second Language Writing 13(1), 63–80.
• Goldstein, L. (2001). For Kyla: what does the research say about responding to EFL writers. In T. Sylva & P. K. Matsuda (Ed.), On Second Language Writing (pp. 73–89). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Inc., Publishers.
• Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R.B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London and New York: Longman
• Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Hedgcock, J. S., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(2), 141–163.
• Hirose, K., & Sasaki, M. (1994). Explanatory variables for Japanese students’ expository writing in English: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 203-229.
• Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing. Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.) (pp.1- 19).
• Feedback in second language writing: contexts and issues. New York: Cambridge University Press. Jacobs, H., Zinkgraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hartfiel, V., & Hughey, J. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. MA: Newbury House.
• Knoch, U. (2011). Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: What should they look like and where should the criteria come from? Assessing Writing, 16, 81-96.
• Kumar, R. (1999). Research Methodology. London: Sage Publications. Lam, R. (2013). Two portfolio systems: EFL students’ perceptions of writing ability, text improvement, and feedback. Assessing Writing, 18, 132-153.
• Lee, I. (2002). Teaching coherence to ESL students: A classroom inquiry. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(2), 135- 159.
• Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning? Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180–198.
• Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69-85.
• Miyazaki, K. (2008). Construct validity of analytic rating scales used in EFL essay writing assessment: reconsidering components in rhetorical features. Journal of Foreign Language Education, 5, 1- 22.
• Quinlan, T., Higgins, D., & Wolff, S. (2009). Evaluating the construct-coverage of the e-rater® scoring engine. (ETS research report January 2009). Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/research/contact.html
• Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching: A Guidebook for English Language Teachers. Macmillan Education, Oxford.
• Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 133-158.
• Seidlhofer, B., & Breiteneder, M.L.P. (2006). English as a lingua franca in Europe: Challenges for applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 3-34.
• Semke, H.D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195–202.
• Sengupta, S. (1998). From text revision to text improvement: a story of secondary school composition. RELC Journal, 29(1), 110–137.
• Sengupta, S. (2000). An investigation into the effects of revision strategy instruction on L2 secondary school learners. System, 28(1), 97–113.
• Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369.
• Weigle, S.C. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Yang, W. & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 31–48
• Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 79–102.