Incidences and reporting rates of incidental findings on lumbar, thoracic, and cervical spinal magnetic resonance images and extra-neuronal findings on brain magnetic resonance images

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence rates, reporting rates, and the best imaging plane andsequence for incidental findings in patients undergoing spinal and brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.Methods: Three experienced radiologists retrospectively re-evaluated the MR images of 1056 consecutivepatients.Results: The incidence rates for extraspinal incidental findings for the images of the lumbar, thoracic, andcervical spine, and extra-neuronal incidental findings on MR images of the brain were 35.47%, 32.25%,29.16%, and 54.35%; respectively, with reporting rates of incidental findings for these examinations of 31.47%,8.33%, 29.50%, and 59.62%; respectively. For all examination types, the T2-weighted sequence and the axialplain were the best to reveal the incidental findings of MR examinations, other than that of the cervical spine.Conclusions: Incidental findings, which are commonly detected during routine spinal and brain MRevaluations, are occasionally omitted from formal radiological reports in daily practice. We strongly recommendchecking the T2-weighted axial plane for MR imaging of the lumbar, thoracic spine and brain and taking asecond look at the T2-weighted sagittal plane MR images of the cervical spine during radiological evaluations.

PDF

___

[1] Magnavita N, Magnavita G, Fileni A, Bergamaschi A. Ethical problems in radiology: medical error and disclosure. Radiol Med 2009;114:1345-55.

[2] Fileni A, Magnavita N. A 12-year follow-up study of malpractice claims against radiologists in Italy. Radiol Med 2006;111:1009-22.

[3] Frager DH, Elkin CM, Kansler F, Mendelsohn SL, Leeds NE. Extraspinal abnormalities identified on lumbar spine CT. Neuroradiology 1986;28:58-60.

[4] Lee SY, Landis MS, Ross IG, Goela A, Leung AE. Extraspinal findings at lumbar spine CT examinations: prevalence and clinical importance. Radiology 2012;263:502-9.

[5] Park HJ, Jeon YH, Rho MH, Lee EJ, Park NH, Park SI, et al. Incidental findings of the lumbar spine at MRI during herniated intervertebral disk disease evaluation. Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1151-5.

[6] Tuncel SA, Çağlı B, Tekataş A, Kırıcı MY, Ünlü E, Gençhellaç H. Extraspinal incidental findings on routine MRI of lumbar spine: prevalence and reporting rates in 1278 patients. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:866-73.

[7] Kamath S, Jain N, Goyal N, Mansour R, Mukherjee K. Incidental findings on MRI of the spine. Clin Radiol 2009;64:353-61.

[8] Grady AT, Sosa JA, Tanpitukpongse TP, Choudhury KR, Gupta RT, Hoang JK. Radiology reports for incidental thyroid nodules on CT and MRI: high variability across subspecialties. Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:397-402.

[9] Cho HW, Park JO, Lee YH, Chung SY, Suh JS. Should we recommend ultrasonography for an incidental thyroid nodule on additional cervicothoracic sagittal T2-weighted image of lumbar spine MRI? Investig Magn Reson Imaging 2015;19:224-30.

[10] Mancuso AA. Another pesky incidental thyroid nodule! Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2444-5.

[11] Katzman GI, Dagher AP, Patronas NJ. Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. JAMA 1999;282:36-9.

[12] Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, Vincent AJPE, Hofman A, Krestin GP, et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. New Engl J Med 2007;357:1821-8.

[13] Morris Z, Whiteley WN, Longstreth WT Jr, Weber F, Lee YC, Tsushima Y, et al. Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2009;339:b3016.

[14] Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, McIntosh JH. The outcomes for patients with incidental lesions: serendipitous or iatrogenic? Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1193-6.