TÜRK KİLİMLERİNE KAZANDIRILMAYA ÇALIŞILAN TİCARİ ÜRÜN ÖZELLİĞİ BAĞLAMINDA DÜZ DOKUMALARIN PlET MONDRIAN, WASSILY KANDINSKY, JOAN MIRO, PAUL KLEE'NİN YAPITLARIYLA YÜZEY DEĞERLENDİRME ACISINDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
Estetik degerlendirmeler toplumlann IcCltirrlerine bagh olarak decj@kendirler. Bu nedenle gelenelcsel anlamda-fonksiyonel olaralc yapllm~$ bu t13 dmeklerin eurensel sanat ue estetik dl- ~iilerle degerlendirilmesi dahn saglikh olacaklu. Illcel ddneme ail rnagara resimkrinin prirnilu sanat anlayLy ile degerlendirilmesinde oldau gibi lcilim motffleri de Piet Mondrian Wassily Kandinsky. Joan Miro ue Paul Klee'nin yap~tlnmdalri diUe decjerlendirilebilir
COMPARISON OF PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS WITH THE WORKS OF PIET MONDRIAN, WASSILY KANDINSRP. JOAN MIRO, PAUL KLEE FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF SURFACE EVALUATION DJ RELATION TO COMMERCIAL PRODUCT ASPECTS BEING TRIED TO BE IMPARTED TO TWSH RUGS
Aesthetic values are varidde depending on the cultures oJ communities. As a consequence, it will be healthier to assess samples of this sort manufactured asficlional items in the Lraditional sense by universal criteria or art and aesthetics. As in the assessment of the cave paintings of the primitive era by the primitwe art concepts. the rug motiues may be assesed by the same language as that in the works orPiet mondrian, Wassib Kandinsly. Joan Miro and of Paul Klee.