KURU VE ISLAK DURUMLARDA PAMUKLU ÖRME KUMAŞLARIN ISIL KONFOR ÖZELLİKLERİ

Giysi konforu son yıllarda kumaş özellikleri için en önemli nitelik olmaya başlamış ve ısıl özelliklerin ölçümünü kapsayan birçok çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ancak bu çalışmaların büyük bir bölümünde ısıl özellikler sadece kuru durumda incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, terleme sonrasındaki ısıl özellikleri analiz ederek giysilerin ısıl konfor özelliklerini karakterize etmektir. Bu amaçla farklı pamuk iplikleri ile örülen kumaşların hem kuru hem de ıslak durumlar için ısıl iletkenlik, ısıl soğurganlık ve ısıl direnç değerleri test edilmiştir. Sonuçlar karde ve penye iplikler ile örülen kumaşların ısıl konfor özellikleri arasında önemli bir farkın olmadığını, diğer yandan merserizasyon işleminin bu özellikleri önemli seviyede etkilediğini göstermektedir. Tüm kumaş numuneleri ıslandıktan sonra soğuk his ve düşük ısıl izolasyon özelliği sergilemektedir

THERMAL COMFORT PROPERTIES OF COTTON KNITTED FABRICS IN DRY AND WET STATES

In recent years the importance of clothing comfort properties became one of the most important feature of the fabrics and many of the studies are devoted to measurements of thermal properties. However in many of these researches, the thermal comfort characteristics of fabrics were investigated only in dry state. The aim of this study is to characterize thermal comfort properties of garments with analyzing thermal properties after sweating. For this aim thermal conductivity, thermal absorptivity and thermal resistance values of fabrics, knitted with different types of cotton yarn, were tested in both dry and wet states. The results indicate that there is not any significant difference between thermal comfort properties of the fabrics knitted with carded and combed yarns, whereas mercerization process affected to these properties significantly. After wetting, all fabric structures indicate cooler feeling and lower thermal insulation

___

  • 1. http://textilepapers.tripod.com/smart.htm, 2009.
  • 2. “Human Comfort and Health Requirements”, 2009. http://media.wiley.com/product_data/excerpt/53/04716896/0471689653.pdf.
  • 3. Yoneda M., Kawabata S., 1982, “A Theoretical Consideration on the Objective Measurement of Warm/Cool Feeling”, The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 393-406pp.
  • 4. Hes L., 1987, “Thermal Properties of Nonwovens”, Proceedings of Congress Index 87, Geneva.
  • 5. Frydrych I., Dziworska G., and Bilska J., 2002, “Comparative Analyses of the Thermal Insulation Properties of Fabrics Made of Natural and Man-Made Cellulose Fibres”, Fibres Textiles Eastern Europe, 39:40–44pp.
  • 6. Hes L., 2000, “An Indirect Method for The Fast Evaluation of Surface Moisture Absorptiveness of Shirt and Underwear Fabrics”, Vlakna a Textil, 7(2):91-96pp.
  • 7. Hes L., Araujo M. and Storova R., 1993, “Thermal Comfort of Socks Containing PP Filaments”, Textile Asia, December: 57-59pp.
  • 8. Guanxiong Q., Yuan Z., Zhongwei W., Jianli L., Min L. and Jie Z., 1991, “Comfort in Knitted Fabrics”, International Man-Made Fibres Congress Proceeding, p112, Dornbirn.
  • 9. Grayson M., 1983, “Encyclopedia of Composite Materials and Components”, John Wiley & Sons, USA.
  • 10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conductivity.
  • 11. Oglakcioglu N., Celik P., Bedez Ute T., Marmarali A. and Kadoglu, H., 2009, “Thermal Comfort Properties of Angora Rabbit/Cotton Fiber Blended Knitted Fabrics”, Textile Research Journal, 79(10):888-894pp.
  • 12. Hes L., Geraldes M. J. and Araújo, M., 2002, “How to Improve the Thermal Comfort with High Performance PP Fibers”, 2nd AUTEX Conference Proceeding, p428, Belgium.
  • 13. Jun Y., Kang Y. K., Park C., and Choi C., 2002, “Evaluation of Textile Performance of Soccer Wear”, Textile Asia, 33(5):43-44pp.
  • 14 Ozdil N., Marmarali A., and Kretzschmar Donmez S., 2007, “Effect of Yarn Properties on Thermal Comfort of Knitted Fabrics”, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 46(12):1318–1322pp.
  • 15. Behera B. K., Ishtiaque S. M. and Chand S., 1997, “Comfort Properties of Fabrics Woven from Ring-, Rotor-, and Friction-spun Yarns”, Journal of the Textile Institute, 88(3):255-264pp.
  • 16. Pac M.J., Bueno M.A. and Renner M., 2001, “Warm-Cool Feeling Relative to Tribological Properties of Fabrics”, Textile Research Journal, 71(9):806-812pp.
  • 17. Ozdil N. and Oglakcioglu N., 2006, “Thermal Comfort of Cotton Socks”, The second edition of the International Conference of Applied Research on Textile (CIRAT-2), Tunisia.
  • 18. Gunesoglu S., Meric B. and Gunesoglu C., 2005, “Thermal Contact Properties of 2-Yarn Fleece Knitted Fabrics”, FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe, 13(2/50):46-50pp.
  • 19. Nida Oğlakcioğlu, Arzu Marmarali, 2007, “Thermal Comfort Properties Knitted Structures”, FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe, 15(5-6/64-65):94-96pp.
  • 20. Ucar N. and Yilmaz T., 2004, “Thermal Properties of 1×1, 2×2, 3×3 Rib Knit Fabrics”, FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe, 12(3/47):34–38pp.
  • 21. Milenkovic L., Skundric P., Sokolovic R. and Nikolic T., 1999, “Comfort Properties of Defense Protective Clothing”, The Scientific Journal Facta Universitatis, 1(4):101-106pp.
  • 22. Havenith G., 2002, “Interaction of Clothing and Thermoregulation”, Exogenous Dermatology, 1(5): 221-230pp.
  • 23. Hes L., 1999, “Optimisation of Shirt Fabrics' Composition from the Point of View of Their Appearance and Thermal Comfort”, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 11(2/3):105-115pp.