Optimization of the Distribution Uniformity of a Single-Disc Granular Broadcast Spreader

The objective of this study was to optimize the distribution uniformity performance of a single-disc granular broadcast spreader. The performance indicators were considered to be the coefficient of variation (CV, %) and skewing ratio (left to right or right to left ratio of the granular material applied). Central Composite Design (CCD) which is rotatable and one of the designs in Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used in order to optimize the distribution uniformity. Two different fertilizers (urea and triple super phosphate) were used and a total of 20 experiments for each fertilizer were conducted. Each experiment was triplicated. The independent variables considered in this study were the peripheral speed of the disc (corresponding to power take-off linearly), the fertilizer flow rate and the impeller angle. The dependent variables were the coefficient of variation (CV, %) and skewing ratio (either right to left or left to right distribution). Mathematical functions in polynomial form were developed based on the principles of RSM that allowed conducting reduced number of experiments as compared to full factorial design. The optimum levels of the variables were obtained and verification tests were also achieved. It was concluded that the three variables considered in this study affect the distribution uniformity performance of the broadcast spreader.  

___

  • ASABE Standards, S341.3, 2004. Procedure for Measuring Distribution Uniformity and Calibrating Broadcasts spreaders. St. Joseph, Mich.:ASAE.
  • Box. G. E.P., N. Draper. 1987. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 669 p. Kolcu, İ. S. 2012. Tek Diskli Gübre Dağıtma Makinası Örneğinde Gübre Dağılım Düzgünlüğünün Tepki Yüzeyleri Metodolojisi Kullanılarak Optimizasyonu. E. Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tarım Makinaları Anabilim Dalı, Bornova-İzmir Søgaard, H.T., P. Kierkegaard. 1994. Yield reduction resulting from uneven fertilizer distribution. Transactions of the ASAE, 37(6): 1749-1752.
  • Myers, R. H. 1971. Response Surface Methodology. Allyn & Bacon Inc., Boston, MA., USA, pp 246.
  • Mennel, R. M., and A. R. Reece. 1963. The theory of the centrifugal distributor, III: particle trajectories. J. Agric. Engng Res. 8(1): 78–84.
  • Güler, H. 1995. Ege Bölgesinde Yaygın Olarak İmal Edilen Tipte Örnek Bir Tek Diskli Mineral Gübre Dağıtma Makinasında Değişik Kanat Profillerinin Gübre Dağılımına Etkileri. E.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans tezi, 85 s, Bornova-İzmir.
  • Yıldırım Y., M. Kara. 2003. Effect of Impeller Height on Distribution Uniformity in Rotary Fertilizer Spreaders With Different Flow Rates. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 19 (1): 19-23.
  • Yıldırım Y. 2006. Effect of Cone Angle and Revolution Speed of Disc on Fertilizer Distribution Uniformity in Single-Disc Rotary Fertilizer Spreaders. Journal of Applied Sciences 6 (14): 2875 - 2881.
  • Parish R.L. 2003. Effect of Impeller Angle on Pattern Uniformity. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 19(5): 531-533.
  • Parish R.L. 2002. Rate Setting Effects on Fertilizer Spreader Distribution Patterns. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 18(3): 301–304.