Serbest ve Altlıklı Yer Sisteminde Yetiştirilen Tavukların Bazı Verim Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırılması

Araştırma serbest sistem ve altlıklı yer sisteminde yetiştirilen tavukların bazı verim özellikleri bakımından karşılaştırılması amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Her yetiştirme sisteminde 150 adet olmak üzere toplam 300 adet Lohmann Brown tavuk kullanılmıştır. Serbest sistemde tavuk başına 4 m2 otlatma alanı ayrılmıştır. Tavuklar 16 haftalık yaşta araştırma kümesine alınmış ve 52 haftalık yaşa kadar verim özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada üzerinde durulan özelliklerden yaşama gücü, % 50 verim yaşı, yumurta ağırlığı, tavuk-gün yumurta verimi, yem tüketimi, yemden yararlanma oranı ve dönem başı canlı ağırlığı bakımından gruplar arasında farklılık bulunmadığı, dönem sonu canlı ağırlığı bakımından ise önemli farklılık olduğu belirlenmiştir. Araştırmada altlıklı yer sistemindeki tavukların serbest sisteme göre daha fazla canlı ağırlık kazandıkları, ancak diğer özelliklerin yetiştirme sistemlerinden etkilenmediği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Comparison of Hens Reared in Free-Range and Deep-Litter Systems in Terms of Certain Production Characteristics

The study was carried out compare the hens reared in free range system and deep-litter system in terms of certain production characteristics. A total of 300 Lohmann Brown hens, with 150 hens in each of the groups were used in the study. In the free range system, 4 m2 grazing ground was allocated for each hen. The hens were taken into research henhouse at 16 weeks of age and production characteristics were determined up to 52 weeks of age. It was determined that out of the characteristics focused in the study, there is no significant difference between the groups in terms of viability, 50% production age, egg weight, hen-day egg production, feed efficiency, feed consumption and body weight at 18 week of age, whereas there is a significant difference in terms of final body weight. In the study, it was concluded that hens in the deep-litter system gained more body weight compared to those in the free-range system but the other characteristics were not affected by the husbandry systems.

PDF

___

Yang H M, Yang Z, Wang W, Wang Z Y, Sun H N, Ju X J & Qi X M (2014). Effects of different housing systems on visceral organs, serum biochemical proportions, immune performance and egg quality of laying hens. European Poultry Science 78: doi:10.1399/ eps.2014.48
Wegner R M (1982). Investigation of production systems for laying hens with regard to ethological aspects. Landbauforsch 32(3): 162-166
Torges G & Matthes S (1975). Investigations on the effect of type of management of laying hens (free-range, on the floor or in cages) on egg quality characters. Kleintierzucht in Forschung und Lehre, Celler Jahrbuch 23: 18
Senčic´ Đ & Butko D (2006). Productivity of layers and egg quality in free range and cage system of housing. Poljoprivreda 12(2): 48-51
Sekeroglu A, Sari̇ca M, Demi̇r E, Ulutas Z, Ti̇lki̇ M, Saatci̇ M & Omed H (2010). Effects of different housing systems on some performance traits and egg qualities of laying hens. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Advances 9(12): 1739-1744
Samiullah S, Roberts J R & Chousalkar K K (2014). Effect of production system and flock age on egg quality and total bacterial load in commercial laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 23(1): 59-70
Pavlovski Z, S̆krbic´ Z & Lukic´ M (2004). Influence of housing type on internal and external quality of eggs in small flocks of hens. Živinarstvo 39(6-7): 9-23
Pavlovski Z, Mašic´ B, Josipovic´ S & Hopic´ S (1992). The effect of the system of housing on the laying performance of hens in small flocks. Biotechnologija u Stočarstvu 8(1-2): 57-63
Nistor L I, Albu A, Nistor A C & Usturoi M G (2015). Aspects of eggs quality provided from free range and conventional systems. Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology and Food Science 5(2): 186-189
Nistor L I, Albu A & Usturoi M G (2014). Knowledge of chemical indicators of eggs from hens reared in conventional and free range system. Food Science & Technology 71(2): 119-124
Malik S & Singh N P (2010). Performance of CARI Nirbheek in agroclimatic conditions of Tripura. Indian Journal of Animal Science 80(12): 1213-1216
Leyendecker M, Hamann H, Hartung J, Kamphues J, Ring C, Glunder G, Ahlers C, Sander I, Neumann U & Distl O (2001). Analysis of genotype-environment interactions between layer lines and hen housing systems for performance traits, egg quality and bone breaking strength 2nd communication: Egg quality traits. Züchtungskunde 73(4): 308-323
Hill J A (1986). Egg production in alternative systems-a review of recent research in the UK. Research and Development in Agriculture 3(1): 13-18
Hanusová E, Hrnčár C, Hanus A & Oravcová M (2015). Effect of breed on some parameters of egg quality in laying hens. Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica 18(1): 20-24
Doley S, Barua N & Kalita N (2010). Effect of rearing systems on meat and egg qualities in indigenous fowls. Indian Veterinary Journal 87(2): 168-170
Clerici F, Casiraghi E, Hidalgo A & Rossi M (2006). Evaluation of eggshell quality characteristics in relation to the housing system of laying hens. 12th European Poultry Conference, 10-14 September, Verona, Italy, pp. 277
Angelovičová M, Ševčíková V, Angelovič M & Bučko O (2014). Comparison of two different breeding systems of laying hens in relation to egg shell quality. Animal Science Biotechnology 47(2): 166-171
Anderson K E (2009). Overview of natural and organic production: Looking back to the future. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18: 348-354