Önder ÇALMAŞUR, Sultan ÇOBANOĞLU, Kübra AKÇAKOYUNLUOĞLU

Mite Diversity (Acari) from Ornamental Plants in Erzurum in Turkey

Mite species belongs to Tetraychychidae (3); Tenupalpidae (2),Stigmaeidae (1), Tydeiidae (2), (Acari: Prostigmata);Phytoseiidae (10) (Acari: Mesostigmata) and Acaridae (1)(Astigmata) were identified on woody ornamental plants andshrubs in Erzurum (Eastern part of Turkey). The samples werecollected from Erzurum (Centrum, Pasinler, Köprüköy, Horasan,Aziziye-Ilıca, Aşkale, Tortum, Uzundere and Çat districts) witha weekly interval between April to October during 2015 and2016. Five species were phytophagous mites (belong toTenuipalpidae and Tetranychidae), while the others areconsidered as predators or feed on microorganisms, neutral intheir habitats. Nineteen mite species representing in three orders:Amblyseius andersoni (Chant), Kampimodromus aberrans(Oudemans), Euseius finlandicus (Oudemans), Typlodromuscotoneastri (Wainstein), Neoseiulus astutus (Beglyarov),Phytoseius finitimus Ribaga, Typhlodromus (Anthoseius)kerkirae Swirski and Ragusa, Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) recki(Wainstein), Paraseiulus soleiger (Ribaga), Neoseiulellatiliarum (Oudemans), Zetzellia mali (Ewing), Tydeus kochiOudemans, Tydeus californicus (Banks), Tetranychus urticaeKoch, Bryobia rubrioculus (Scheuten), Bryobia praetiosa Koch,Cenopalpus pulcher (Canestini & Fanzago) Brevipalpuscalifornicus (Banks), Tyrophagus putrescentiae. These resultsshowed that Erzurum has rich biodiversity especially concerningpredatory mite fauna. T. urticae (Schrank), was the mostabundant and common phytophagous species (53.11%) whilesome other species were represented only one specimen(Neoseiulus astutus (Beglyarov) (Phytoseiidae). Most preferredhosts plants were Philadelphus coronarius L. (Hydrangeaceae)(8), Malus coronaria L. (Rosaceae) (7) and Rosa canina L.(Rosaceae) (6) while Syringa vulgaris L. (Oleaceae), Salix sp.(Salicaceae) and Rosa pisiformis (Christ) (Rosaceae) werepopulated by only (2) and (1) mite species respectively.

PDF

___

Alaoğlu Ö (1991). Two new records of eriophyid mites (Acarina:Eriophyoidea) for the Turkish fauna. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Dergisi 22 (1): 72-77
Alaoğlu Ö (1996). Erzincan ve Erzurum illerinde Phytoseiidae (Acarina) faunası üzerinde çalışmalar. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 9(11): 7-14
Banks N (1904). Four new species of injurious mites. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 12: 53-56
Beglyarov G A. (1960). Two new species of mite of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten 1857 (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, Russia 39: 956-958
Chant D A (1957). Descriptions of some Phytoseiidae mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Nine new species from British Columbia with keys to the species of British Columbia. Part II: Redescripyion of eight species described by Berlese. The Canadian Entomologist 89(7): 289-308
Çobanoğlu S (1989). Türkiye için üç yeni faydalı akar (Acari, Phytoseiidae) türü. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi 13(4): 229-238
Çobanoğlu S (2002). Amblyseius astutus (Beglarov. 1960) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), Türkiye faydalı akar faunası için yeni bir kayıt. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi 26(3): 115-120
Çobanoğlu S & Kaźmierski A (1999). Tydeidae and Stigmaeidae (Acari Prostigmata) from orchards, trees and shrubs in Turkey. Biological Bulletin of Poznan 36: 71-82
Çobanoğlu S & Kumral N A (2014). Ankara, Bursa ve Yalova ıllerinde domates yetiştirilen alanlarda zararlı ve faydalı akar (Acari) biyolojik çeşitliliği ve popülasyon dalgalanması. Turkish Journal Of Entomology 38(2): 197-214
Çobanoğlu S, Ueckermann E A & Sağlam H S (2016). The Tenuipalpidae of Turkey, with a key to species (Acari: Trombidiformes) Zootaxa. 4097(2): 151-186
Demite P R, Moraes G J de, McMurtry J A, Denmark H A. & Castilho R C (2015). Phytoseiidae Database. Retrieved in December, 02, 2018 from www.lea.esalq.usp.br/phytoseiidae
Doğan S (2007). Checklist of raphignathoid mites (Acari: Raphignathoidea) of Turkey. Zootaxa 1454: 1-26
Döker İ, Kazak C & Karut K (2016). Contributions to the Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) fauna of Turkey: morphological variations, twelve new records, re-description of some species and a revised key to the Turkish species. Systematic and Applied Acarology 21 (4): 505-527. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.11158/saa.21.4.10
Ecevit O (1981). Erzurum Elma Ağaçlarında Zararlı Bryobia rubrioculus Scheuten, Tetranychus urticae Koch., Aculus schlectendali (Nal.), Calepitrimerus haileyi Keifer (Acarina: Tetranychidae, Erophyiidae) ile Predatör Amblydromella kazachstanicus Wainstein (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) ve Populasyon İlişkileri. Ondokuzmayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları Samsun, pp. 52
Ewing, H E ( 1917). New Acarina. Part II.- Description of new species and varieties from Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio. Bulletin American Museum of Natural History 38: 149-172
Faraji F, Çobanoğlu S & Çakmak İ (2011). A checklist and a key for the Phytoseiidae species of Turkey with two new species records (Acari: Mesostigmata). International Journal of Acarology 37: 221-243
Göven M A, Çobanoğlu S, Güven B & Topuz M (1999). “Investigations on the fauna of phytoseiid mites on vineyards in Aegean Region, 491-500”. Proceedings of the Fourth Turkish National Congress of Biological Control, 26-29 Jan, Adana, Entomol Society Publication 9
Henderson R C (2001). Technique for positional slide-mounting of Acari. Systematic and Applied Acarology Special Publications 7: 1-4
Irmak M A (2013). Use of native woody plants in urban landscapes. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 11(2): 1305-1309
Jeppson L R, Keifer H H & Baker E W (1975). Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. University of California Press, Berkely, pp. 646
Kasap İ, Çobanoğlu S & Pehlivan S (2013). Çanakkale ve Balıkesir illeri yumuşak çekirdekli meyve ağaçları ve yabancı otlar üzerinde bulunan predatör akar türleri. Türkiye Biyolojik Mücadele Dergisi 4(2): 109-124
Kılıç T, Çobanoğlu S, Yoldaş Z & Madanlar N (2012). Izmir ilinde taze soğan tarlalarında bulunan akar (Acari) türleri. Turkish Journal Of Entomology 36(3): 401-411
Koch C L (1836). Deutsche Crustacea, Myriapoda, Arachnida. fasc. 1
Kolodochka L A (1978). Manual for the identification of plant-inhabiting phytoseiid mites. Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Zoological Institute. Naukova Dumka Kiev, pp. 78
Kumral N A & Çobanoğlu S (2015). The potential of the nightshade plants (Solanaceae) as reservoir plants for pest and predatory mites. Turkish Journal Of Entomology 39(1): 91-108
Kumral N A & Çobanoğlu S (2016). The Mite (Acari) biodiversity and population fluctuation of predominat species in eggplant. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 22: 261-274
Migeon A & Dorkeld D (2006-2016). Spider Mites Web: A Comprehensive Database for the Tetranychidae. Montpellier, France: INRA. Retrieved in December, 02, 2018 from http://www.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmweb
Moraes G J, McMurtry J A, Denmark H A & Campos C B (2004). A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 434: 1-494
Oudemans A C (1915). Acarologische Aanteekeningen. LVI. Entomologische Berichten 4: 180-188
Oudemans A C (1928). Acarologische aanteekeningen XCIV. Entomologische Berichten 7: 374-382
Oudemans A C (1930). Acarologische Aanteekeningen. CI. Entomologische Berichten 8: 48-53
Özman S K & Çobanoğlu S (2001). Current status of hazelnut mites in Turkey. Acta Horticulturae 556: 479-487
Papadoulis G Th, Emmanouel N G & Kapaxidi E V (2009). Phytoseiidae of Greece and Cyprus (Acari: Mesostigmata). Indira Publishing House pp. 200
Pritchard A E & Baker E W (1958). The False Spider Mites (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae). University of California Publications in Entomology 14(3): 175-274
Ribaga C (1904). Gamasidi planticoli. Revista di patologia vegetale 10: 175-178
Ripka G, Fain A, Kaźmierski A, Kreiter S & Magowski W Ł (2002). Recent data to the knowledge of the arboreal mite fauna in Hungary (Acari: Mesostigmata, Prostigmata, and Astigmata). Acarologia 42: 271-281
Ripka G, Fain A, Kazmierski A, Kreiter S & Magowski W Ł (2005). New data to the knowledge of the mite fauna of Hungary (Acari: Mesostigmata, Prostigmata, and Astigmata). Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 40: 159-176
Scheuten A (1857). Einiges über Milben. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 23(1): 104-114
Schrank, F P (1781). Enumeratio Insectorum Austriae Indigenorum. August Vindelicor, Klett, pp. 548
Seeman O D & Beard J J (2011). Identification of exotic pest and Australian native and naturalised species of Tetranychus (Acari: Tetranychidae): Zootaxa 2961: 1-72
Swirski E & Ragusa S (1976). Notes on predacious mites of Greece, with a description of Þve new species (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae). Phytoparasitica 4: 101-122
Szabó Á, Kóródi I & Pénzes B (2009). Ragadozó atkák elôfordulása a Tokaj-hegyaljai borvidéken. (Predatory mite in Tokaj wine region). Növényvédelem 45: 21-27
Wainstein B A (1958). New species of mites of the genus Typhlodromus (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) from Georgia [in Russian]. Soobshcheniya Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoy SSR 21(2): 201-207
Wainstein B A (1961). New species of mites of the genus Typhlodromus (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) in Georgia. [in Russian]. Trudy Instituta Zoologii Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoy SSR 18: 153-162
Uysal C, Çobanoğlu S & Ökten M E (2001). Ankara parklarında zarar yapan Tetranychoidea (Acarina: Prostigmata) türleri ve konukçularının saptanması üzerinde araştırmalar. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi 25(2): 147-160