Karıncalar Hymenoptera: Formicidae ve Coccoidea Hemiptera: Sternoryncha Türlerinin İlişkileri

Coccoidea kabuklubitler, koşniller türleri ile karıncaların oldukça ilginç ve çok yönlü ilişkileri vardır. Karıncalar, ballı madde salgılayan coccoidlerden, karbonhidrat, protein ve lipid kaynağı olarak faydalanırken, coccoidler bu ilişkiden, yeni bitkilere taşınarak, iklim koşulları ve doğal düşmanlarından korunarak çıkar sağlarlar. Bitkiler üzerinde karıncanın bulunması, coccoidlerin populasyonunu arttırırken, karıncaların diğer zararlı böcekleri avlamaları, bitkinin genel sağlığını olumlu etkilemektedir. Coccoidlerle savaşımda karıncaların öldürülmesi veya göz ardı edilmesi diğer bitki zararlılarının populasyonunu arttırır. Floroastik, ve yapı bakımından çok kompleks ekosistemler, ballı maddeye bağımlı, yararlı karıncaları teşvik edebilir. Zararlıların yönetiminde polikültür alanlardaki karınca koşnil ilişkileri monokültür alanlardaki karınca koşnil ilişkilerine göre daha fazla göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır

Ants interactions with Coccoidea Hymenoptera: Formicidae Species Hemiptera: Sternoryncha

The ants and Coccoidea scale insects species that produce honeydew have diverse and interesting relationships. The ants use these Coccoidea as the source of carbohydrate, protein and lipid while the coccoids take advantage of being transported to new plants by ants so that they protect themselves from changing climate conditions and from their natural enemies. The presence of ants on the plants has two important effects; it increases the population of scale insects and increases the general well-being of the plants by hunting the pest on plant. The extermination of ants or ignoring the harmful effect of pesticides on ants during pesticide treatment results in the significant increase in the population of other pests on the plant. The floristic and/or structurally complex ecosystems may intrigue the ants tended to honeydew. The mutual relations between ant and scale insects in poly-cultural environments should be considered more seriously than in monocultural environments during pest management

___

  • Adenuga, A.O. 1975. Mutualistic association between ants and some homoptera- Its significance in Cocoa production. Psyche, 82:24-28.
  • Bach, C.E. 1991. Direct and indirect interactions between ants (Pheidole megacephala),scales (Coccus viridis) and plants (Pluchea indica). 87: 233-239.
  • Balakrishnan, M. M, P. K. Vinodkumar and C.B. Prakasan. 1992. A note on green scale-ant association on coffee. 56: 5-6.
  • Bartlett, B.R. 1961. The influence of ants upon parasites, predators, and scale insects. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 54: 543-551.
  • Beattie, A.J. 1985. The evolutionary ecology of ants-plants mutualisms. Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge. 182 pp.
  • Ben-Dov, Y. 1978. Andaspis formicarum N. SP. (Homoptera; Diaspididae) associated with a species of Melissotarsus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in South Africa. Insectes socıaux. 25:315-321.
  • Ben-Dov, Y. 1990. Relationships and ants. p. 339-343. Editor: D. Rosen. Armored scale insects-their natural enemies and control, Vol A, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Bradley,G.A. 1973. Effect of Formica obscuripes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on the predatör-prey relationship between Hyperaspis congressis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Toumeyella numismaticum (Homoptera: Coccidae). Canadian Entomologist. 105:1113-1118.
  • Buckley, R.C. 1987. Interactions involving plants, Homoptera, and ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 18:111-135.
  • Buckley,R. and P. Gullan. 1991. More aggressive ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) provide better protection for soft scales and mealybugs (Homoptera: Coccidae, Pseudococcidae). Biotropica, 23: 282-286.
  • Burns, D.P. and D.E. Donley. 1970. Biology of the Tuliptree Scale, Toumeyella liriodendri (Homoptera: Coccidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 63: 228-235.
  • Campbell, C.A.M. 1994. Homoptera associated with the ants Crematogaster clariventris, Pheidole megacephala and Tetramorium aculeatum (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) on cocoa in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research 84(3): 313-318.
  • Campos-Farinha, A.E. and F.J. Zorzenon. 2005. Predatory and interaction behaviors Of Paratrechina fulva (Mayr) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on phytophagous insects on palm Trees. Arq. Inst. Biol., São Paulo, 71:143-144
  • Das, G.M. 1959. Observations on the association of ants with coccids of tea. Bulletin of Entomological Research 50: 437-448.
  • Delage-Darchen, B., D. Matile-Ferrero and A. Balachowsky. 1972. [On an aberrant case of mealybug-ant symbiosis.] (In French). Compte Rendu de l'Academie des Sciences. Paris 275: 2359-2361.
  • Delabie,J.H.C., C.S.F. Mariano, J.E. Serrão, and S.G. Pompolo. 2004. The Karyotype Of The Aberrant Obligate Ant attended Mealybug, Neochavesia caldasiae (Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae: Rhizoecinae). Caldasia 26: 185-190.
  • Evans,H.C.1974. Natural control of arthropods, with special reference to ants (Formicidae), by fungi in the tropical high forest of Ghana. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 11: 37-49.
  • Evans,H.C. and D. Leston. 1971. A Ponerine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) associated with Homoptera on cocoa in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 61, 357-362.
  • Flanders, S.E. 1957. The complete interdependence of an ant and coccid. Ecology. 38: 535-536.
  • Gaume L., D. Matile-Ferrero and D. McKey. 2000. Colony foundation and acquisition of coccoid trophobionts by Aphomomyrmex afer (Formicinae): co-dispersal of queens and phoretic mealybugs in an ant-plant- homopteran mutualism? Insectes sociaux. 47 : 84–91
  • Gill, R.J., S. Nakahara and M.L. Williams. 1977. A review of the genus Coccus Linnaeus in America north of Panama (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Coccidae). Occasional Papers in Entomology, State of California, Department of Food and Agriculture 24: 44.
  • Gullan, P.J, R.C. Buckley and P.S. Ward. 1993. Ant-tended scale insects hemiptera coccidae Myzolecanıum within lowland rain forest trees in Papua New Guinea. 9: 81- 91.
  • Gullan, P.J. 1997. Relationships with ants. 351-373. Edit. Y. Ben-Dov and C.J. Hodgson. Soft Scale Insecta-Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control Elseviesr, Amsterdam.
  • Heckroth H.P., B. Fiala, P. J. Gullan, A. Hj. Idris and U. Maschwitz. 1998. The soft scale (Coccidae) associates of Malaysian ant-plants. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 14:427–443.
  • Heidari, M. and M.J.W. Copland. 1993. Honeydew a food resource or arrestant for the mealybug predatör Cryptolaemus montrouzieri. 38: 63-68
  • Helms, K. R. and S. B. Vinson. 2002, Widespread association of the invasive ant Solenopsıs invicta with an invasive mealybug. Ecology, 83(9): 2425–2438
  • Ho, C.T. and K.C. Khoo. 1997. Partners in Biological Control of Cocoa Pests: Mutualism Between Dolichoderus thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Cataenococcus hispidus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 87: 461-470.
  • Hoy, J.M. 1963. A catalogue of the Eriococcidae (Homoptera: Coccoidea) of the World. New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research Bulletin 150: 1-260.
  • Hölldobler, B. and E.O. Wilson. 1990. The ants. Springer verlag, Berlin. 732 pp.
  • Itioka,T. and T. Inoue. 1996. The consequences of ant- attendance to the biological control of the red wax scale insect Ceroplastes rubens by Anicetus beneficus. Journal of Applied Ecology.33: 609-618.
  • Itioka, A. and T. Inoue. 1999. The alternation of mutualistic ant species affects the population growth of their trophobiont mealybug. Ecography 22: 169-177.
  • Jahn, G.C. and J.W. Beardsley, 1998. Presence/absence sampling of mealybugs, ants, and major predators in pineapple. Journal of Plant Protection in the Tropics 11:73-79.
  • James, D.G., M.M. Stevens, K.J O'Malley and R.J. Faulder, 1999. Ant foraging reduces the abundance of beneficial and incidental arthropods in citrus canopies. Biological Control 14: 121-126.
  • Johnson, C.D., J.H. Agosti, K. Delabie, D.J Dumpert,. M. Williams, M.von Tschirnhaus, and U.Maschwitz, 2001. Acropyga and Azteca ants with scale Insects: 20 Million Years of Intimate Symbiosis. American Museum Noviates, 3335:1-18.
  • Kishimoto Yamada K., Itioka T. and Kawai S. 2005. Biological characterization of the obligate symbiosis between Acropyga sauteri Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Eumyrmococcus smithii Silvestri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae: Rhizoecinae) on Okinawa Island, southern Japan. Journal of Natural History, 39:3501-3524.
  • Kondo, T. and P.J. Gullan 2004. A New Species of Ant- Tended Soft Scale of the Genus Cryptostigma Ferris (Hemiptera: Coccidae) Associated with Bamboo in Peru. Neotropical Entomology 33:717-723.
  • Kosztarab, M. and F. Kozár, 1988. Scale Insects of Central Europe. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
  • Maschwitz, U., K. Dumpert, T.Botz and W.Rohe. 1991. A silk-nest weaving Dolichoderine ant in a Malayan rain forest. Insectes Sociaux 38: 307-316.
  • Maschwitz, U., B.Fiala, S.J. Davies, and K.E. Linsenmair. 1996. A south-east Asian myrmecophyte with two alternative inhabitants: Camponotus or Crematogaster as partners of Macaranga lamellata. Ecotropica 2: 29- 40.
  • Murphy, S. T. 1991. Insect naturel enemies of coffee green scales (Hemiptera: Coccidae) in Kenya and their potential for biological control of Coccus celatus and C.viridis in Papua New Guinea, Entomophaga. 36:519- 529.
  • Özdemir I. 2004. Ankara ilinde otsu bitkilerde saptanan Aphidoidea türleri üzerinde taksonomik araştırmalar. Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi Ankara, 188 s.
  • Prins,A.J, Y. Ben-Dov and D.J.Rust, 1975. A new observation on the association between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and armoured scale insects (Homoptera: Diaspididae). Journal Entomology Society Southern Africa 38: 211-216.
  • Reimer,N.J., M. Cope and G. Yasude. 1993. Interference of Pheidole megacephala (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with biological control of Coccus viridis (Homoptera: Coccidae) in coffee. 22: 483-488.
  • Samways, M.J. 1983. Interrelationship between an entomogenous fungus and two ant-homopteran (Hymenoptera: Formicidae- Homoptera: Pseudococcidae and Aphididae) mutualism on guava tress. Bulletin Entomological Research 73: 321-331.
  • Styrsky, J.D. and M. D. Eubaunks. 2006. Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proc. R. S. doi:10.1098/rspb. Online punlished. 1-14.
  • Sugonyaev,E.S. 1995. Ant nests on living plants in the tropics as refuges for soft scale insects (Homoptera,Coccidae), protecting them from the attacks of chalcidoid parasites (Hymenoptera,Chalcidoidea). Entomological Review 75:120-127.
  • Terayama, M. 1986. A new species of the anomalous ant- attended mealybug genus Eumyrmococcus (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae) from Japan. Kontyu, 54: 509-512.
  • Ülgentürk, S. 2001. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Associated with soft Scale Insects in Turkey: A Preliminary List, Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 36: 405-409
  • Way, M.J. 1954. Studies on the association of the ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latr.) (Formicidae) with the scale insect Saissetia zanzibarensis Williams (Coccidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 45:113-134.
  • Way, M.J. 1963. Mutualism between ants and honeydew- producing Homoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 8: 307-344.
  • Way, M.J. and Khoo K.C. 1992. Role of ants in pest managements. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37:479-503.
  • Williams J.R. and D.J. Williams. 1980. Excretory behaviour in soft scales (Hemiptera: Coccidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 70:253-257.