Ayça TULGA

Shear bond strength of veneer composite to cobalt-chromium alloys fabricated differently

ABSTRACT Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess and contrast the shear bond strength of a veneer composite resin bonded to cobalt-chromium (CoCr) dental alloys produced by different techniques. Material-Method: Ninety cylindrical specimens (10mm in diameter, 8mm in height) made of CoCr dental alloys were prepared by casting (C), milling (M), LaserCUSING with and without annealing (CL+, CL), and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) with and without annealing (EL+, EL). Veneer composite cylinders (5mm in diameter, 3mm in height) were built on metal specimens using a silicone jig. After storage in water for 24 hours, the specimens were assessed for bond strength with a shear force test at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The shear bond strengths (SBSs) were statistically analyzed using the Kolmogorow-Smirnow test and Tukey-HSD multiple comparison test (α=.05). Results: When the SBS values of the groups were compared, significant differences were found among the groups (P<.05). While statistically significant differences were found between the CL+ group (9.36∓2.62) and the M group (13.34∓2.53) (P<.05), there were no significant differences among the others (P>.05). The debonded surfaces of the specimens exhibited mostly mixed failure types. Conclusions: The CoCr alloy fabrication technique has an effect on the SBSs between the veneer composite resin and the metal used. LaserCUSING casting, a new technology, seems to have the lowest metal-resin bond strength among all the techniques tested.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Cobalt-chromium alloys, direct metal laser sintering, milling, shear bond strength

PDF

___

1. Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:351-63.
2. Noort RV. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.
3. Chua CK, Leong KF, Lim CS. Rapid Prototyping. In: Kai C, Fai K, Sing C, editors. Powder-based rapid prototyping systems. 3th ed., Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. 2010. p.199-300.
4. Azari A, Sakineh N. The evolution of rapid prototyping in dentistry: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 2009;15:216-25.
5. Sinirlioğlu MC. Rapid manufacturing of dental and medical parts via LaserCUSING technology using titanium and CoCr powder materials. Workshop on Rapid Technologies; 2009 Sept 24th; Turkey.
6. Ayyıldız S, Soylu EH, İde S, Kılıç S, Sipahi C, Pişkin B et all. Annealing of Co-Cr dental alloy: effects on nanostructure and Rockwell hardness. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:471-8.
7. Guo WH, Brantley WA, Li D, Clark WAT, Monaghan P, Heshmati RH. Annealing study of palladium–silver dental alloys: Vickers hardness measurements and SEM microstructural observations. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:111-8.
8. Chen CL, Tatlock GJ, Jones AR. Effect of annealing temperatures on the secondary re‐crystallization of extruded PM2000 steel bar. J Microsc 2009;233:474-81.
9. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Brückner H, Handel G. Composite veneering of metal based fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:614-9.
10. Drago Carl, Lynn Gurney. Maintenance of implant hybrid prostheses: clinical and laboratory procedures.J Prosthodont 2013;22: 28-35.
11. Jandt KD, Bernd WS. Future perspectives of resin-based dental materials. Dent Mater 2009;25:1001-6.
12. Kern M, Thompson VP. Durability of resin bonds to a cobalt-chromium alloy. J Dent 1995;23:47-54.
13. Grover N, Nandlal B. An in vitro evaluation of the effect of sandblasting and laser surface treatment on the shear bond strength of a composite resin to the facial surface of primary anterior stainless steel crowns. J Clin Exp Dent 2015;7:119-25.
14. Sarafianou A, Seimenis I, Papadopoulos T. Effectiveness of different adhesive primers on the bond strength between an indirect composite resin and a base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:377-87.
15. Egoshi T, Taıra Y, Soeno K, Sawase T. Effects of sandblasting, H2SO4/ HCl etching, and phosphate primer application on bond strength of veneering resin composite to commercially pure titanium grade 4. Dent Mater J 2013;32:219-27.
16. Patil SS, Kontham UR, Kamath A, Kontham R. Shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to preformed metal crowns for primary molars using a universal adhesive and two different surface treatments: an in vitro study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2016;17:377-80.
17. Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Damerau G. Spark erosion as a metal–resin bonding system. Dent Mater 2007;23:193-7.
18. Muratomi R, Kamada K, Taira Y, Higuchi S, Watanabe I, Sawase T. Comparative study between laser sintering and casting for retention of resin composite veneers to cobalt-chromium alloy. Dent Mater J 2013;32:939-45.
19. Sunitha N, Ariga P, Jain AR, Philip JM. An in vitro evaluation of flexural bond strength of indirect composites fused to metal. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013;13:122-7.
20. Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:77-82.
21. Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:77-82.
22. Petridis H, Hirayama H, Kugel G, Habib C, Garefis P. Shear bond strength of techniques for bonding esthetic veneers to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:608-14.
23. Gu D, Shen Y. Balling phenomena in direct laser sintering of stainless steel powder: Metallurgical mechanisms and control methods. Mater Des 2009;30:2903-10.
24. Al Jabbari YS, Koutsoukis T, Barmpagadaki X, Zinelis S. Metallurgical and interfacial characterization of PFM Co-Cr dental alloys fabricated via casting, milling or selective laser melting. Dent Mater 2014;30:79-88.
25. Kim JY, Pfeiffer P, Niedermeier W. Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of resin-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 184-9.