Merve ERKEN, Zeynep BAŞAĞAOĞLU DEMİREKİN, Erdal, Suha TÜRKASLAN

Fiberle Güçlendirilmiş Kompozit Köprü Uygulamalarının Hasta Memnuniyetinin Değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, direk yöntem ile hazırlananfiber ile güçlendirilmiş kompozit kantilever köprürestorasyonlarının, bir yıllık hasta memnuniyetinin VASskalası ile değerlendirmektir.Materyal-Metot: Tek diş eksikliğinde direk yöntemleuygulanan 105 adet, fiberle güçlendirilmiş köprü çalışmayadahil edilmiştir. VAS skalası yardımıyla, hastalardanprotezlerinin görünüşü, rengi, çiğneme etkinliği ve genelmemnuniyeti açısından değerlendirme yapmaları istenmiştir.Başlangıç, 3., 6., 9., ve 12. ay kontrol seanslarındadeğerlendirme yapılmıştır. Her bir kategori, 10 mm‘çok memnunum’ 0 mm ‘hiç memnun değilim’ şeklindederecelendirilmiştir.Bulgular: Genel ortalama olarak, VAS skalasında renk(7,03mm), görünüş (7,05), çiğneme (6,4 mm) ve genelmemnuniyet (7,5 mm), olarak tespit edilmiştir. Dönemlerarası fark istatistik olarak anlamlı değildir.Sonuç: Fiber ile güçlendirilmiş kompozit köprü uygulamalarıkoruyucu ve estetik bir tedavi yöntemidir. Diğer avantajlarınınarasında, kısa sürede sonuca ulaşılması, düşük maliyetliolması, hijyenik ve kolay uygulanabilir olması yer alır.Fiber ile güçlendirilmiş kompozit köprü uygulamalarının1 yıllık estetik ve fonksiyon açısından hasta memnuniyetideğerlendirildiğinde mükemmel ya da iyi olarak tespit edildi.

The Evalution Of Patient Satisfaction Fiber Reinforced Bridge

Objective: To evaluate the patient satisfaction of directly placed fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) fixed partial dentures (FPDs) in 1 years with VAS scale. Material-Method: One hundred five FRC FPDs (105 subjects) were directly fabricated to restore a single missing tooth. Prosthesis appearance, colour, chewing ability and overall satisfaction were evaluated by patients using a visual analogue scale (VAS). At the baseline, 3., 6., 9., 12 month follow ups, patient self-satisfaction evaluation of the FRC FPDs prosthesis was performed regarding prosthesis appearance, colour, chewing ability and general satisfaction. Each category was rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 10 mm with ‘extremely dissatisfied’ at 0 mm and ‘extremely satisfied’ at 10 mm. Results: On average, vas scale was determined as color (7.03 mm), appearance (7.05 mm), chewing (6.4 mm) and overall satisfaction (7.5 mm). The difference between periods is not statistically significant. Conclusion: The fiber reinforced resin-bonded bridge offers a conservative and esthetic application. Other advantages include low cost compared to conventional bridges, saving of time, ease of application and hygiene, and natural sense. The evaluation of the patient satisfaction of esthetic and functional outcomes of the FRC FDPs after 2 years were clinically excellent or good.

PDF

___

1. McLean J. The Science and Art of Dental Ceramic, Volume I: the Nature of Dental Ceramics and Their Clinical Use: Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1979.
2. Howe DF, Denehy GE. Anterior fixed partial dentures utilizing the acid-etch technique and a cast metal framework. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1977;37(1):28-31.
3. Wiltshire W. Tensile bond strengths of various alloy surface treatments for resin bonded bridges. Quintessence of dental technology. 1986;10(4):227-32.
4. Tanaka T, Atsuta M, Uchiyama Y, Kawashima I. Pitting corrosion for retaining acrylic resin facings. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1979;42(3):282-91.
5. Johnston JF, Phillips RW, Dykema RW. Modern practice in crown and bridge prosthodontics: WB Saunders Co.; 1965.
6. Ayna E, Celenk S. Polyethylene fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures: two-year preliminary results. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2005;7(4).
7. Monaco C, Ferrari M, Caldari M, Baldissara P, Scotti R. Comparison of 2 bonding systems and survival of fiberreinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2006;19(6).
8. Hugo B. System for removing a defect in a tooth and insert or tool for such a system. Google Patents; 2000.
9. Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1999;81(3):318-26.
10. Albersnagel FA. Velten and musical mood induction procedures: A comparison with accessibility of thought associations. Behaviour research and therapy. 1988;26(1):79- 95.
11. Besser A, Priel B. Emotional responses to a romantic partner's imaginary rejection: The roles of attachment anxiety, covert narcissism, and self‐evaluation. Journal of personality. 2009;77(1):287-325.
12. Besser A, Shackelford TK. Mediation of the effects of the big five personality dimensions on negative mood and confirmed affective expectations by perceived situational stress: A quasi-field study of vacationers. Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;42(7):1333-46.
13. Durkan R, Deste G, Ozkır SE. Adeziv Maryland Köprü Restorasyonunda Y-Tzp Tam Kontür Zirkonya Seramik Sisteminin Kullanılması: Klinik Vaka Raporu. A.Ü.2017.Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 44(2) 123-128.
14. Chafaie A, Portier R. Anterior fiber-reinforced composite resin bridge: a case report. Pediatric Dentistry. 2004;26(6):530- 4.
15. Korkmaz FM, Baygın O, Ateş SM, Çağlar İS. Fiber Destekli Estetik Adeziv Köprüler. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Prosthodontics-Special Topics. 2016;2(2):6-12.
16. Stokholm R, Isidor F. Resin-bonded inlay retainer prostheses for posterior teeth. A 5-year clinical study. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1996;9(2).
17. Cushing A, Sheiham A, Maizels J. Developing sociodental indicators--the social impact of dental disease. Community dental health. 1986;3(1):3-17.
18. Rosenoer L, Sheiham A. Dental impacts on daily life and stisfaction with teeth in relation to dental status in adults. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 1995;22(7):469-80.
19. Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1975;1(4):379-84.
20. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2008;133(4):515-23.
21. Ritter DE, Gandini Jr LG, Pinto AS, Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. The Angle Orthodontist. 2006;76(2):198-203.
22. Creugers N, De Kanter R. Patients’ satisfaction in two long‐term clinical studies on resin‐bonded bridges. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2000;27(7):602-7.
23. Malmstrom H, Dellanzo‐Savu A, Xiao J, Feng C, Jabeen A, Romero M, et al. Success, clinical performance and patient satisfaction of direct fibre‐reinforced composite fixed partial dentures–a two‐year clinical study. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2015;42(12):906-13.
24. Wolff D, Schach C, Kraus T, Ding P, Pritsch M, Mente J, et al. Fiber-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: a retrospective clinical examination. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13(2):187-94.
25. Li J, Jiang T, Lv P, Fang X, Xiao Z, Jia L. Four-Year Clinical Evaluation of GFRC-RBFPDs as Periodontal Splints to Replace Lost Anterior Teeth. The International journal of prosthodontics. 2016;29(5):522-7.