___

• Agars, M. D. (2004). Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(2), 102-111.
• Arvate, P. R., Galilea, G. W., & Todescat, I. (2018). The queen bee: A myth? The effect of top-level female leadership on subordinate females. Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 533-548.
• Asgari, S., Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2012). When do counterstereotypic ingroup members inspire versus deflate? The effect of successful professional women on young women's leadership self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 370-383.
• Bagues, B., Sylos-Labini, M., & Zinovyeva, N. (2017). Does the gender composition of scientific committees matter?. American Economic Review, 107, 1207-1238.
• Baron, R. S., Burgess, M. L., & Kao, C. F. (1991). Detecting and labeling prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 115-123.
• Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2003). The effects of being categorised: The interplay between internal and external social identities. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 139-170.
• Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., & Banal, S. (2006). Working undercover: Performance-related self-confidence among members of contextually devalued groups who try to pass. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 337-352.
• Barreto, M., Ryan, M. K., & Schmitt, M.T. (2009). The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2013). Sexism in contemporary societies: How it is expressed, perceived, confirmed, and resisted. M.K. Ryan & N.R. Branscombe (Eds.), In The SAGE handbook of gender and psychology (s. 289-305). London: Sage Publication.
• Becker, J. C., & Tausch, N. (2014). When group memberships are negative: The concept, measurement, and behavioral implications of psychological disidentification. Self and Identity, 13, 294-321.
• Biggs, J., Hawley, P. H., & Biernat, M. (2018). The academic conference as a chilly climate for women: Effects of gender representation on experiences of sexism, coping responses, and career intentions. Sex Roles, 78, 394-408.
• Bourguignon, D., Teixeira, C. P., Outten, H. R., Koc, Y., Faniko, K., & Schmitt, M. T. (2020). On the protective role of identification with a stigmatized identity: Promoting engagement and discouraging disengagement coping strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1125-1142.
• Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R. & Doosje, B. (1999a). The context and content of social identity threat. N. Ellemers, R. Spears ve B. Doosje (Eds.), In Social identity: Context, commitment, content (s. 35-58). Oxford: Blackwell Science.
• Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T. & Harvey, R. D. (1999b). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
• Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J. & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 662-669.
• Britton, D. M. (2017). Beyond the chilly climate: The salience of gender in women’s academic careers. Gender & Society., 31, 5-27.
• Burke, K. L. (2017). Harassment in science: recent studies demonstrate an unwelcoming workplace for people of color and women in STEM fields, point to a need to raise awareness among men and leaders, and elicit calls for cultural change. American Scientist, 105(5), 262-264.
• Buunk, B. P. &Van der Laan, V. (2002). Do women need female role models? Subjective social status and the effects of same-sex and opposite sex comparisons. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 15(3), 129-155.
• Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J. & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38, 33-53.
• Cibibin, C. & Leo, I. (2022). The “Queen Bee Syndrome” in sports federations: An exploratory investigation of gender stereotypes in Italian female coaches. Sustainability, 14(3), 1-11.
• Cooper, V. W. (1997). Homophily or the Queen Bee syndrome: Female evaluation of female leadership. Small Group Research, 28(4), 483-499.
• Corbett, H. (2022). What equal pay day 2022 data is - and is not - telling us. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/ sites/hollycorbett/2022/03/14/what-equal-pay-day-2022-data-is-and-is-not-telling-us/?sh=63455e70332b.
• Cowan, G., Neighbors, C., DeLaMoreaux, J. & Behnke, C. (1998). Women’s hostility toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 267-284.
• Derks, B., Van Laar, C. & Ellemers, N. (2006). Striving for success in outgroup, settings: Effects of contextually emphasizing in group dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 576-588.
• Derks, B., Van Laar, C. & Ellemers, N. (2007a). Social creativity strikes back: Improving low status group members’ motivation and performance by valuing in group dimensions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 470-493.
• Derks, B., Van Laar, C. & Ellemers, N. (2007b). The beneficial effects of social identity protection on the performance motivation of members of devalued groups. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1, 217-256.
• Derks, B., Van Laar, C. & Ellemers, N. (2009). Working for the self or working for the group: How self- vs. group-affirmation affect collective behavior in low status groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 183-201.
• Derks, B., Ellemers, N., Van Laar, C. & De Groot, K. (2011a). Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 519-535.
• Derks, B., Van Laar, C., Ellemers, N. & De Groot, K. (2011b). Gender-Bias Primes Elicit Queen-Bee Responses Among Senior Policewomen. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1243-1249.
• Derks, B., Scheepers, D., Van Laar, C. & Ellemers, N. (2011c). The threat vs. challenge of car parking for women: How self- and group affirmation affect cardiovascular responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 178-183.
• Derks, B., Van Laar, C., Ellemers, N. & Raghoe, G. (2015). Extending the queen bee effect: How Hindustani workers cope with disadvantage by distancing the self from the group. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 5-21.
• Derks, B., Van Laar, C. & Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 456-469.
• Derks, B., Van Veelen, R. & Handgraaf, M. (2018). Successful economists are highly masculine. Economische Statistische Berichten, 103, 16-19.
• Dobson, R. & Iredale, W. (2006). Office Queen Bees hold back women’s careers. The Sunday Times. http://www. timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1265356.
• Domen, I., Scheepers, D., Derks, B. & Van Veelen, R. (2022). It’s a man’s world, right? How confrontations with women who challenge versus legitimize the gender hierarchy affect physiological threat and challenge responses in men. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(3), 703-726.
• Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
• Eagly, A. H. & Sczesny, S. (2009). Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed?. M. Barreto, M.K. Ryan, M.T. Schmitt (Eds.), In The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (s. 21-47). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
• Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G. & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3-22.
• Eccleston, C. P. & Major, B. N. (2006). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: The role of group identification and appraisals. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 147-162.
• Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 27-57.
• Ellemers, N., Spears, R. & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together of falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617-626.
• Ellemers, N. (2001). Social identity, commitment, and work behavior. M.A. Hogg & D.J. Terry (Eds.), In Social identity processes in organizational contexts (1st Edition, s. 101-114). NY: Psychology Press.
• Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity and relative deprivation. I. Walker (Ed.), In Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (s. 239-264). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Ellemers, N., Spears, R. & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
• Ellemers, N., Van Den Heuvel, H., De Gilder, D., Maass, A. & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the Queen Bee syndrome?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 315-338.
• Ellemers, N. & Barreto, M. (2009). Collective action in modern times: How modern expressions of prejudice prevent collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 749-768.
• Ellemers, N. & Van Laar, C. (2010). Individual mobility: The opportunities and challenges members of devalued groups encounter when trying to avoid group-based discrimination. J. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick & V. Esses (Eds.), In Handbook of prejudice and discrimination (s. 561-576). London: Sage Publications.
• Ellemers, N. & Haslam, S. A. (2011). Social identity theory. P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski & T. Higgins (Eds.), In Handbook of theories of social psychology (s. 379-398). London.
• Ellemers, N., Rink, F., Derks, B. & Ryan, M. K. (2012). Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this). Research in Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 163-187.
• Ellemers, N. (2014). Women at work: How organizational features impact career development. Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 46-54.
• Ely, R. J. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203-238.
• Ely, R. J. (1995). The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 589-634. Ensher, E. A. & Murphy, S. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(3), 460-481.
• Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D. & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11, 102-111.
• Essien, I., Otten, S. & Degner, J. (2020). Group evaluations as self-group distancing: Ingroup typicality moderates evaluative intergroup bias in stigmatized groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1108-1124.
• Euronews. (2020). Kadın yönetici oranında Türkiye Avrupa’da sondan ikinci. https://tr.euronews.com/2020/03/ 07/kadin-yonetici-oraninda-turkiye-avrupa-da-sondan-ikinci.
• Faniko, K., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Buschini, F., & Chatard, A. (2008). Affirmative action plans that assist women’s mobility in Albania: The paradox of education. S. Fischer & H. Pleines (Eds.), In Crises and conflicts in post-socialist societies. The role of ethnic, political, and social identities in changing Europe (s. 209-219). Stuttgart: Ibidem Publishers.
• Faniko, K., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Buschini, F. & Chatard, A. (2012). The influence of education on attitudes toward affirmative action: The role of the policy’s strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 387-413.
• Faniko, K., Ellemers, N. & Derks, B. (2016). Queen Bees and Alpha Males: Are successful women more competitive than successful men?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(7), 903-913.
• Faniko, K., Ellemers, N., Derk, B. & Cioldi, F.L. (2017). Nothing change really why women who break through The Glass Ceiling end up reinforcing it. Personality and Social Psychology Journal, 43, 638-651.
• Faniko, K., Chipeaux, M. & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2018). Le phénomène de la reine des abeilles: Comment et pourquoi les femmes renforcent les inégalités de genre. (Queen Bee phenomenon: How and why women reinforce gender inequality). Faniko, K., Bourguignon, D., Sarrasin, O. & Guimond, G. (Eds.), In Psychologie de la discrimination et des préjugés: De la théorie à la pratique (Psychology of discriminations and prejudices: From theory to practice) (s. 129-145). Belgium:De Boeck.
• Faniko, K., Ellemers, N. & Derks, B. (2021). The Queen Bee phenomenon in Academia 15 years after: Does it still exist, and if so, why?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 383-399.
• Garcia-Retamero, R. & Lopez-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55(1), 51.
• Giasson, H. L. & Chopik, W. J. (2020). Geographic patterns of implicit age bias and association with state-level health outcomes across the United States. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1173-1190.
• Gibson, D. E. (2003). Developing the professional self-concept: Role model construals in early, middle, and late career stages. Organization Science, 14, 591-610.
• Gibson, D. E., Cordova, D. I., Murrell, A. J., Crosby, F. J. & Ely, R. J. (1999). Women's and men's role models: The importance of exemplars. A. J. Murrell, F. J. Crosby ve R.J. Ely (Eds.), In Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (s. 121-141). NJ US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Gilbert, L. A., Gallessich, J. M. & Evans, S. L. (1983). Sex of faculty role model and students self-percetion of competency. Sex Roles, 9, 597-607.
• Goh, J. X., Kort, D. N., Thurston, A. M., Benson, L. R. & Kaiser, C. R. (2019). Does concealing a sexual minority identity prevent exposure to prejudice?. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 1056-1064.
• Gomes, M. B., Grangeiro, R. R. & Esnard, C. (2022). Academic women: A study on the queen bee phenomen. RAM Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 23(2), 1-30.
• Górska, P. & Bilewicz, M. (2015). When “a group in itself” becomes “a group for itself”: Overcoming inhibitory effects of superordinate categorization on LGBTQ individuals. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 554-575.
• Grangeiro, R. da R., Rezende, A.T., Gomes Neto, M. B., Carneiro, J. S. & Esnard, C. (2022). Queen Bee phenomenon scale: Psychometric evidence in the Brazilian context. Brazilian Administration Review, 19(1), 1-23.
• Habertürk. (2022). İstihdamda kadının adı yok. https://www.haberturk.com/son-dakika-istihdamda-kadinin-adi-yok-3367403-ekonomi.
• Haslam, S. A., Van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M.J. & Ellemers, N. (2014). Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice. London: Psychology Press.
• Haslam, S. A., Brien, A. O., Jetten, J., Vormedal, K. & Penna, S. (2005). Taking the strain: Social identity, social support, and the experience of stress. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 355-370.
• He, J. & Kang, S. (2021). Covering in cover letters: Gender and self-presentation in job applications. Academy of Management Journal, 64(4), 1097-1126.
• Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organisational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657-674.
• Hinchliffe, E. (2021). The female CEOs on this year’s Fortune 500 just broke three all-time records. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2021/06/02/female-ceos-fortune-500-2021-women-ceo-list-roz-brewer-walgreens-kar en-lynch-cvs-thasunda-brown-duckett-tiaa/.
• Hoyt, C. L. & Simon, S. (2011). Female leaders: Injurious or inspiring role models for women?. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 143-157.
• Hurst, J., Leberman, S. & Edwards, M. (2016). Women managing women. Gender in Management, 31(1), 61-74.
• Jackson, L. M., Esses, V. M. & Burris, C. T. (2001). Contemporary sexism and discrimination: The importance of respect for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 48-61.
• Jetten, J., Haslam, S. A., Cruwys, T., Greenaway, K. H., Haslam, C. & Steffens, N. K. (2017). Advancing the social identity approach to health and well-being: Progressing the social cure research agenda. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 789-802.
• Jiménez-Moya, G., Spears, R., Rodríguez-Bailón, R. & de Lemus, S. (2015). By any means necessary?. When and why low group identification paradoxically predicts radical collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 517-535.
• Johnson, Z. & Mathur-Helm, B. (2011). Experiences with queen bees: a South African study exploring the reluctance of women executives to promote other women in the workplace. South African Journal of Business Management, 42(4), 47-55.
• Johnson, Z. & Mathur-Helm, B. (2011). Experiences with Queen Bees: A South African study exploring the reluctance of women executives to promote other women in the workplace. South African Journal of Business Management, 42, 47-55.
• Joy, L., Carter, N. M., Wagner, H. M. & Narayanan, S. (2007). The Bottom Line: Corporate performance and women’s representation on boards. Research Report. https://www.catalyst.org/wp-content/ uploads/ 2019/01/The_Bottom_Line_Corporate_Performance_and_Womens_Representation_on_Boards. pdf.
• Kaiser, C. R. & Spalding, K. E. (2015). Do women who succeed in male-dominated domains help other women? The moderating role of gender identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 599-608.
• Kanter, R. M. (1987). Men and Women of the Corporation Revisited: Interview with Rosabeth Moss Kanter. Management Review, 26(2), 257-263.
• Kende, J., Baysu, G., Van Laar, C. & Phalet, K. (2020). Majority group belonging without minority group distancing? Minority experiences of intergroup contact and inequality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 121-145.
• Kirby, T. A., Silva Rego, M. & Kaiser, C. R. (2020). Colorblind and multicultural diversity strategies create identity management pressure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1143-1156.
• Kuchynka, S. L., Salomon, K., Bosson, J. K., El-Hout, M., Kiebel, E., Cooperman, C. & Toomey, R. (2018). Hostile and benevolent sexism and college women’s STEM outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42, 72-87.
• Lockwood, P. (2006). ‘Someone like me can be successful’: Do college students need same-gender role models?. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 36–46.
• Mackey, C. D., Silver, C. F., Rios, K., Cowgill, C. M., & Hood, R. W. (2020). Concealment of nonreligious identity: Exploring social identity threat among atheists and other nonreligious individuals. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 860-577.
• Maranto, C. L. & Griffin, A. E. (2011). The antecedent of a “chilly climate” for women faculty in higher education. Human Relations, 64, 139-159.
• Mathison, D. L. (1986). Sex differences in the perception of assertiveness among female managers. Journal of Social Psychology, 126(5), 599-606.
• Mavin, S. (2006). Venus envy: Problematizing solidarity behaviour and queen bees. Women in Management Review, 21, 264-276.
• Mavin, S. (2008). Queen Bees, wannabees, and afraid to bees: No more ‘best enemies’ for women in management. British Journal of Management, 19, 75-84.
• Milliyet (2022). Türkiye’de kadın yönetici sayısı hâlâ yetersiz. https://www.milliyet.com.tr/gundem/ turkiyede-kadin-yonetici-sayisi-hala-yetersiz-6706969.
• Mulcahy, M. & Linehan, C. (2014). Females and precarious board positions: Further evidence of the glass cliff. British Journal of Management, 25, 425-438.
• Newheiser, A. K., Barreto, M. & Tiemersma, J. (2017). People like me don't belong here: Identity concealment is associated with negative workplace experiences. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 341-358.
• Ng, C. W. & Chiu, W.C.K. (2001). Managing equal opportunities for women: Sorting the friends from the foes. Human Resource Management Journal, 11, 75-88.
• Nieva, V. F. & Gutek, B. A. (1981). Women and work: A psychological perspective. NY: Praeger Publishers.
• Outten, H. R., Schmitt, M. T., Garcia, D. M. & Branscombe, N. R. (2009). Coping options: Missing links between minority group identification and psychological well-being. Applied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 58, 146-170.
• Ouwerkerk, J. W., de Gilder, D. & de Vries, N. K. (2000). When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Social identification and individual effort in intergroup competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1550-1559.
• Parks-Stamm, E., Heilman, M. & Hearns, K. A. (2008). Motivated to Penalize: Women's Strategic Rejection of Successful Women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 237-47.
• Pasek, M. H., Filip-Crawford, G. & Cook, J. E. (2017). Identity concealment and social change: Balancing advocacy goals against individual needs. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 397-412.
• Permatasari, D. & Suharnomo, S. (2019). Investigating the “queen bee” phenomenon in Indonesia: A case study. Diponegoro International Journal of Business, 2(1), 41-51.
• Post, C. & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1546-1571.
• Quinn, D. M., Weisz, B. M. & Lawner, E. K. (2017). Impact of active concealment of stigmatized identities on physical and psychological quality of life. Social Science & Medicine, 192, 14-17.
• Ragins, B. R. & McFarlin, D. B. (1990). Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37(3), 321-339.
• Rudman, L. A. & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010.
• Ryan, M. K. & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 549-572.
• Scandura, T. A. & Williams, E. A. (2001). An investigation of the moderating effects of gender on the relationships between mentorship initiation and protégé perceptions of mentoring functions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 342-363.
• Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 675-688.
• Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., Kobrynowicz, D. & Owen, S. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one’s gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197-210.
• Sealy, R. (2010). Changing perceptions of meritocracy in senior women’s careers. Gender in Management, 25, 184-197.
• Sealy, R. & Singh, V. (2010). The importance of role models and demographic context for senior women’s work identity development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 284-300.
• Sheppard, L. D. & Aquino, K. (2013). Much ado about nothing? Observers’ problematization of women’s same-sex conflict at work. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 52-62.
• skdTürkiye. (2020). Dünya çapında kadın istatistikleri. http://www.skdturkiye.org/esit-adimlar/guncel/dunya-capinda-kadin-istatistikleri.
• Spears, R., Doosje, B. & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
• Staines, G., Tavris, C. & Jayaratne, T. E. (1974). The Queen Bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 7(8), 55-60.
• Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J. & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379-440.
• Stroebe, K., Ellemers, N., Barreto, M. & Mummendey, A. I. (2009). For better or for worse: The congruence of personal and group outcomes on targets’ responses to discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 576-591.
• Sutton, R. M., Elder, T. J. & Douglas, K. M. (2006). Reactions to internal and external criticism of outgroups: Social convention in the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 563-575.
• Şahin, O., Van der Toorn, J., Jansen, W. J., Boezeman, E. J. & Ellemers, N. (2019). Looking beyond our similarities: How perceived (in)visible dissimilarity relates to feelings of inclusion at work. M. K. Ryan, C. T. Begeny, R. Bongiorno, T. Kirby & T. Morgenroth (Eds.), In Understanding barriers to workplace equality: A focus on the target’s perspective (s. 102-114). Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA.
• Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Ed.s), In Psychology of intergroup relation (s. 7-24). Chicago: Hall Publishers.
• Tanenbaum, L. (2002). Catfight: Women and competition. NY: Seven Stories Press.
• Tropp, L. R. & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585-600.
• TÜİK. (2022). İstatistiklerle Kadın. (2021). https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Kadin-2021-45635#:~:text=Y%C3%B6netici%20pozisyonundaki%20kad%C4%B1n%20oran%C4%B1%20 %19y%C 4%B1l%C4%B1nda%20%19%2C3%20oldu.
• Van Laar, C., Derks, B., Ellemers, N. & Bleeker, D. (2010). Valuing social identity: Consequences for motivation and performance in low-status groups. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 602-617.
• Van Laar, C., Bleeker, D., Ellemers, N. & Meijer, E. (2014). Ingroup and outgroup support for upward mobility: Divergent responses to ingroup identification in low status groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 563-577.
• Van Laar, C., Meeussen, L., Veldman, J., Van Grootel, S., Sterk, N. & Jacobs, C. (2019). Coping with stigma in the workplace: Understanding the role of threat regulation, supportive factors, and potantial hidden cost. M. K. Ryan, C. T. Begeny, R. Bongiorno, T. Kirby & T. Morgenroth (Eds.), In Understanding barriers to workplace equality: A focus on the target’s perspective (s. 40-54). Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA.
• Van Veelen, R.V. (2019). Double Trouble: How being outnumbered and negatively stereotyped threatens career outcomes of women in STEM. M.K. Ryan, C.T. Begeny, R. Bongiorno, T. Kirby & T. Morgenroth (Eds.), In Understanding barriers to workplace equality: A focus on the target’s perspective (s. 166-179). Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA.
• Van Veelen, R. V., Veldman, J., Laar, C. V. & Derks, B. (2020). Distancing from a stigmatized social identity: State of the art and future research agenda on self-group distancing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1089-1107.
• Veldman, J., Meeussen, L., Van Laar, C. & Lo Bleu, S. (2020). Daily coping with social identity threat in outgroup-dominated contexts: Self-group distancing among female soldiers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 119-130.
• Webber, G. R. & Giuffre, P. (2019). Women’s relationships with women at work: Barriers to solidarity. Sociology Compass, 13(6), 1-13.
• Williams, J. C. (2014). Hacking tech’s diversity problem. Harvard Business Review, 92, 94–100.
• Williams, J. C. & Dempsey, R. (2018). What works for women at work: Four patterns working women need to know. NY: NYU Press.
• Williams, J.C., Berdahl, J.L. & Vandello, J.A. (2016). Beyond work-life “integration”. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 515-539.
• Wright, S. C. (2001). Restricted intergroup boundaries: Tokenism, ambiguity, and the tolerance of injustice. J.T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), In The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (s. 223-254). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Wright, S. C. & Taylor, D. M. (1998). Responding to tokenism: Individual action in the face of collective injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 647-667.
• Ziegler, A. & Stoeger, H. (2008). Effects of role models from films on short-term ratings of intent, interest, and self-assessment of ability by high school youth: A study of gender-stereotyped academic subjects. Psychological Reports, 102(2), 509-531.