REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH?

Öz ABSTRACT After modernisation, numerous new phenomena played a significant role for all of humankind. These phenomena paved the way for novel dilemmas for all people, especially Muslims. These new systems were created by Western civilisation and imposed on other civilisations, and Muslims confront the dilemma of how they can lead a Muslim life under the pressures of modern notions such as the nationstate and devices -like technology. In that context, they need to identify the relationship between religious faith and modern ways of life. This identification, generally, has been discussed in the respect of reformation. This article will discuss the reformation of Islamic law in terms of Sharia and fiqh, and will further cover the similarities and differences between these terms. At the same time, it will attempt to answer the question of whether fiqhis able to disentangle from Sharia and whether or not, in order to reform Islamic law, this is necessary in various circumstances. 
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Shariah, Fiqh

Kaynakça

BIBLIOGRAPHY AN-NA’IM AA, 'Globalization and Jurisprudence: An Islamic Law Perspective' (2005) 54 Emory Law Journal 25–51 Islam and the secular state: Negotiating the future of Shariʻa (Harvard University Press 2008) BASSIOUNI MC and Badr GM, 'The Shari’ah: Sources, Interpretation and Rule-Making' (2002) 135(181) 1 UCLA J. Islamic & Near Eastern L. COULSON NJ, A History of Islamic Law (Edinburgh University Press 1978) HADDAD YY and STOWASSER BF (eds), Islamic law and the challenges of modernity (AltaMira Press 2004) HALLAQ WB, 'What is Sharia?' (2007) 12 Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law 151–80 An introduction to Islamic law (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press 2009) SCHACHT J, An introduction to Islamic law (Oxford University Press 1964) ZUBAIDA S, Law and power in the Islamic world

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { sduhfd369359, journal = {Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {2146-7129}, address = {SDÜ Hukuk Fakültesi Doğu Kampüsü Çünür}, publisher = {Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi}, year = {2017}, volume = {6}, pages = {35 - 51}, doi = {}, title = {REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH?}, key = {cite}, author = {Mutlu, İsmail} }
APA Mutlu, İ . (2017). REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH? . Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi , 6 (1-2) , 35-51 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduhfd/issue/32364/369359
MLA Mutlu, İ . "REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH?" . Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 6 (2017 ): 35-51 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduhfd/issue/32364/369359>
Chicago Mutlu, İ . "REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH?". Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 6 (2017 ): 35-51
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH? AU - İsmail Mutlu Y1 - 2017 PY - 2017 N1 - DO - T2 - Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 35 EP - 51 VL - 6 IS - 1-2 SN - 2146-7129- M3 - UR - Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH? %A İsmail Mutlu %T REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH? %D 2017 %J Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi %P 2146-7129- %V 6 %N 1-2 %R %U
ISNAD Mutlu, İsmail . "REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH?". Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 6 / 1-2 (Eylül 2017): 35-51 .
AMA Mutlu İ . REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH?. sduhfd. 2017; 6(1-2): 35-51.
Vancouver Mutlu İ . REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH?. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017; 6(1-2): 35-51.
IEEE İ. Mutlu , "REFORMATION IN ISLAMIC LAW; CAN SHARIA DISENTANGLE FROM FIQH?", Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 6, sayı. 1-2, ss. 35-51, Eyl. 2017