Ramazan Serezli, Bahadır Uğural

Güney tıbbi sülüğü, Hirudo verbana Carena, 1820 yetiştiriciliğinde farklı ortamların koza ve yavru sayısına etkisi

Tıbbi sülüklerin kontrollü ortamda yetiştiriciliğinin yapılabilmesi, sülük neslinin tükenmesinin engellenmesi için büyük önem taşımaktadır. Ayrıca tıbbi sülüklerin, hijyenik koşullarda yetiştirilmesi, insan sağlığı için kullanım aşamasında istenmeyen komplikasyonların engellenmesi için gereklidir. Bu çalışmada, Hirudo verbana türünün yetiştiriciliği kontrollü ortamlarda yürütülmüş ve çeşitli nemli ortamların etkileri incelenmiştir. Torf, hidrojel ve kırpılmış süngerin koza ve koza içindeki yavru sayısı üzerine etkileri karşılaştırılmıştır. Torf ve hidrojel ortamları koza ve yavru sayısına etki edecek istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık göstermemiştir. Sülük başına koza sayısı torf için 3.13 ± 0.74, hidrojel için ise 2.80 ± 0.56 olarak belirlenmiştir. Koza başına yavru sayısı torf için 11.81 ± 2.27 hidrojel için ise 12.52 ± 1.98 olarak belirlenmiştir (P>0.05). Sonuç olarak, hidrojel özellikle laboratuvarda tıbbi sülük üretimi yapanlar için yeni bir koza bırakma ortamı materyali olabilecektir.

Effects of various environments on number of cocoon and offspring in breeding of southern medicinal leech, Hirudo verbana Carena, 1820

Breeding medicinal leeches in controlled environments is extremely important in order to prevent their extinction. Moreover, due to medicinal leechescoming into contact with the patient's blood, breeding medicinal leeches in hygienic conditions is essential to prevent possible complications.In this study, breeding patterns of Hirudo verbana were studied in controlled conditions and the effects of various moist environments were examined. Peat,hydrogel and chopped sponge materials were compared in terms of number of cocoon and offspring in medicinal leech breeding. Peat and hydrogelenvironments didn’t show any statistically significant difference for number of cocoon and offspring breeding. Cocoon per leech was 3.13 ± 0.74 for peat and2.80 ± 0.56 for hydrogel respectively. Offspring per cocoon was 11.81 ± 2.27 for peat and 12.52 ± 1.98 for hydrogel (P>0.05) respectively. In conclusion,hydrogel could be a new material for medicinal leech cocoon deposition environment especially for laboratory breeders.

PDF

___

Abobatta, W. (2018). Impact of hydrogel polymer in agricultural sector. Advances in Agriculture and Environmental Science: Open Access (AAEOA), 1(2), 59–64. DOI: 10.30881/aaeoa.00011
Ahmed, E.M. (2015). Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review. Journal of Advanced Research, 6(2), 105–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006
Ceylan, M., Çetinkaya, O., Küçükkara, R., & Akçimen, U. (2015). Reproduction efficiency of the medicinal leech Hirudo verbana Carena, 1820. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 15, 411–418. DOI: 10.4194/1303-2712-v15_2_27
CITES. (2019). CITES national export quotas for 2019. Retrieved January 13, 2020, from https://cites.org/eng/export_quotas/CITES_National_ExportQuotas.doc
Elliott, J.M. (2008). Population size, weight distribution and food in a persistent population of the rare medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis. Freshwater Biology, 53(8), 1502-1512. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01978.x
Elliott, J.M. & Kutschera, U. (2011). Medicinal Leeches: Historical use, Ecology, Genetics and Conservation. Freshwater Reviews, 4(1), 21–41. DOI: 10.1608/FRJ-4.1.417
Gileva, O. & Mumcuoglu, K. (2013). Hirudotherapy. In Biotherapy - History, Principles and Practice (pp. 31–76). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6585-6_3
J. Wilkin, P. & M. Scofield, A. (1991). Growth of the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis, under natural and laboratory conditions. Freshwater Biology, 25, 547–553. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb01398.x
Küster, E. (1972). Microbiology of Peat. In Acta Horticulturae (pp. 23–28). International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1972.26.3
Kutschera, U. & Elliott, J. (2014). The European medicinal leech Hirudo medicinalis L.: Morphology and occurrence of an endangered species. Zoosystematics and Evolution, 90(2), 271–280. DOI: 10.3897/zse.90.8715
Kutschera, U. & Roth, M. (2006). Cocoon deposition and cluster formation in populations of the leech Hirudo verbana (Hirudinea: Hirudinidae). Lauterbornia, 56, 5–8.
Kutschera, U. & S Shain, D. (2019). Hirudinea Lamarck 1818: Evolutionary origin and taxonomy of the six medicinal leeches (genus Hirudo) known today. Biomedical Research and Reviews, 3(1), 1–4. DOI: 10.15761/brr.1000126
Malek, M., Jafarifar, F., Roohi Aminjan, A., Salehi, H. & Parsa, H. (2019). Culture of a new medicinal leech: growth, survival and reproduction of Hirudo orientalis Utevsky and Trontelj, 2005 under laboratory conditions. Journal of Natural History, 53(11-12), 627-637. DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1597200
Manav, M., Ceylan, M. & Büyükçapar, H.M. (2019). Investigation of reproductive efficiency, growth performance and survival of the southern medicinal leech, Hirudo verbana Carena, 1820 fed with mammalian and poultry blood. Animal Reproduction Science, 206, 27-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.05.004
McLoughlin, N.J. & Davies, R.W. (1996). The effects of feeding regime on the growth and reproduction of the medicinal leech Hirudo medicinalis. Freshwater Biology, 36(3), 563–568. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1996.00121.x
Narjary, B., Aggarwal, P., Kumar, S. & Meena, M. D. (2013). Significance of hydrogel. Indian Farming, 62(10), 15–17. Official Gazette (2014). Regulation on Traditional and Complementary Medicine Practices. Official gazette, (29158), 27.
Petrauskiene, L., Utevska, O. & Utevsky, S. (2009). Can different species of medicinal leeches (Hirudo spp.) interbreed? Invertebrate Biology, 128(4), 324–331. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2009.00180.x
Saglam, N. (2017). Basic Principles of Breeding of Medicinal Leech, Hirudo verbana. In International Scientific Conference (Caucasus ecosystem: Past, Present and Future (80 years of the zoological investigations of the Caucasus) (pp. 501–506)
Saglam, N. (2018). The effects of environmental factors on leeches. Advances in Agriculture and Environmental Science: Open Access, 1, 1–3. DOI: 10.30881/aaeoa.00001
Saidel, W.M., Saglam, N., Salas-de la Cruz, D., Saunders, R. & Shain, D. H. (2018). Elaborate ultrastructure of the Hirudo (Annelida: Hirudinae) cocoon surface. Journal of Morphology, 279(4), 545–553. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.20787
Spencer, W. & Jones, G. (2007). The captive breeding and educational display of the Medicinal leech Hirudo medicinalis (Linnaeus 1758) at Bristol Zoo Gardens. International Zoo Yearbook, 41(1), 138–144. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2007.00005.x
Wilkin, P.J. (1989). The medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis (L.) (Hirudinea: Gnathobdellae), at Dungeness, Kent. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 101(1), 45-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1989.tb00135.x
Zhang, B., Lin, Q., Lin, J., Chu, X. & Lu, J. (2008). Effects of broodstock density and diet on reproduction and juvenile culture of the Leech, Hirudinaria manillensis Lesson, 1842. Aquaculture, 276(1), 198–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.02.003