Yeşim DENİZ, AYŞE ZEYNEP ZENGİN, MUSA ÇON

DOI No: 10.17155/spd.08803 SPOR KAYNAKLI DENTAL TRAVMALAR, TRAVMALARIN TEDAVİLERİ VE KORUNMA YÖNTEMLERİ

Dünyada spor aktivitelerinin ve spor karşılaşmalarının popülerliği gün geçtikçe artmaktadır. Sağlıklı yaşam için yapılan bu aktivitelerin birçok yararı olmasına karşın spor esnasında travma sonucu görülebilen doku yaralanmaları sıkıntılı bir süreci de beraberinde getirmektedir. Travmatik dental yaralanmalar yüksek prevelanslarından dolayı önemli bir sağlık problemi haline gelmiştir ve ciddi estetik, fonksiyonel ve psikolojik sonuçlar doğurabilirler. Spor kaynaklı bu travmaların diğer travmalardan farkı, ağız koruyucusu kullanarak bu yaralanmaları engellemek veya anlamlı ölçüde azaltmaktır. Travma sonrasında, doğru teşhis ve uygun tedavi ile başarılı bir iyileşme sağlanabilir. Bu çalışmada dental travmaların etiyolojileri, uygulanabilecek acil tedaviler ve ağız koruyucuları hakkında bilgi sunulmaktadır.

The popularity of sports activities and competitions is growing around the world day by day. These activities which are preferred for healthier life has many benefits but they also include a stressful time of tissue traumas which are caused during sports activities. Traumatic dental injures become an important public health problem because of their high prevalence. They can cause serious aesthetic, functional and psychological problems. The use of mouth guards can significantly decrease or prevent sports related dental traumas and this is what separates these traumas from other traumas. After trauma, correct diagnosis and appropriate treatment can provide successful recovery. In this article we present information about the etiologies and emergent treatments of dental traumatic injuries and mouth guards.

PDF

___

1. Gardner DC, Warren SA. Careers and disabilities: A career education approach. Connecticut: Greylock Publishers; 1978.
2. Rotter J. Social learningand clinical psychology. New York Prentice-Hall; 1954.
3. Akbulut E. Müzik eğitimi anabilim dalı öğrencilerinin denetim odaklarına ilişkin algıları. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2006;26 (3): 171-180.
4. Davies GM, Binik YM, Gorman P, Dattell M, McCloskey B, Oscar G, et al. Perceived self-efficacy outcome expectancies and negative mood states in and stage renal disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1982; 91(4): 241-244.
5. Diesterhaft K, Gerken K. Self-conceptandlocus of control as related to achievement of junior high students. Journal Psychoeducational Assessment,1983; 12(1): 367-375.
6. Anderson A, Hattie J, Hamilton RJ. Locus of control, self- efficacy, andmotivation in differents chools: Is moderation the key to success?. Educational Psychology, 2005;25 (5): 517-535.
7. Tyler DK, Vasu ES. Locus of control, self-esteem, achievement motivation, and problem-solving ability; LOGO writer and simulations in the fifth grade classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 1995;28 (1): 98-121.
8. Weinberg RS, Gould D. Foundations of sport and exercise psychology (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2003.
9. Weinberg RS, Gould D. Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Human Kinetics. Champaign, Ill:USA, 5th edition; 2011.
10. Dweck CS. Motivational processes affecting learning. AmericanPsychologist,1986;41: 148-156.
11. Nicholls J. Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice and performance. Psychologica Review, 1984;91:328346.
12. Elliot AJ. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 1999;34:169-189.
13. Elliot AJ, McGregor HA. A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001;80(3): 501519.
14. Eliot AJ, Thrash TM. Achievement goals and hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 2001;13 (2): 139156.
15. Akın A. Achievement goals and academic locus of control: structural equation modeling. EJER, 2010;38:1-
16. Buluş M. Öğretmen Adaylarında Bireysel Farklılıklar Perspektifinden Amaç Yönelimleri, Denetim Odağı ve Akademik Başarı Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 2011;11(2):529-546.
17. Akın A. Akademik kontrol odağı ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2007;34:9-17.
18. Akın A. 2x2 Başarı yönelimleri ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006; 12: 1-13.
19. France MK, Pierrakos O, Russell J, Anderson RD. Measuring achievement goal orientations among freshman engineering students. Paper presented at the annual American Society for Engineering Education south eastern section conference. Blecksburg, VA; 2010.
20. Koç C, Karabağ S. İlköğretim ikinci kademe (6-8. sınıf) öğrencilerinin bilişüstü yetileri ile başarı yönelimlerinin incelenmesi. NWSA: Education Sciences. 2013;8(2):308-22.
21. Morris RL, Kavussanu M. Antecedents of approach-avoidance goals in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2008;26:465-476.
22. Howell AJ,Buro K. Implicit beliefs, achievement goals, and procrastination: a meditational analysis. Learn Individual Differences, 2009;19:151154.
23. Eren A. Examining the teacher efficacy and achievement goals as predictors of Turkish student teachers conceptions about teaching and learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 2009;34(1):68-87.
24. Kazak Cetinkalp Z. The relationship between academic locus of control and achievement goals among physical education teaching program students. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2010;10(11):1387-1391.