Atahan ALTINTAŞ, Emine ÇAĞLAR, F. Hülya AŞÇI

Sürekli optimal performans duygu durumu ve egzersiz davranışı

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürekli optimal performans duygu durumunun cinsiyete ve egzersiz davranışı parametrelerine (sıklık, tür, süre) göre incelenmesidir. Çalışmaya, farklı egzersiz programlarına katılan 74 kadın (X yaş=23.56; Ss=4.06) ve 160 erkek (X yaş=24.15; Ss=6.18) gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Katılımcıların sürekli optimal performans duygu durumları “Sürekli Optimal Performans Duygu Durum Ölçeği- 2 (SOPDDÖ-2)” ile belirlenirken, yaş, cinsiyet, egzersiz sıklığı, egzersiz yapma süresi ve egzersiz türü bilgileri için “Kişisel Bilgi Formu” kullanılmıştır. Katılımcıların sürekli optimal performans duygu durumlarındaki cinsiyet ve egzersiz davranış değişkenlerine göre farkı belirlemek için Çok Yönlü Varyans Analizi (MANOVA) kullanılmıştır. MANOVA analizi sonuçları, erkek ve kadın egzersiz katılımcılarının sürekli optimal performans duygu durumu puanları arasında fark olmadığını ortaya koyarken (p>0.01); egzersiz sıklığı (Hotelling’s T2 = 0.14; F (9,186) = 2.94; p

Dispositional flow state and exercise behavior

The purpose of this study was to examine dispositional flow of Turkish participants in terms of sex and some exercise behavior variables (frequency, type, length and level of activity involvement). The sample of this study constituted 74 female (Mage=23.56; Sd=4.06) and 160 male (Mage=24.15; Sd=6.18) participants from variety of exercise programs. A demographic questionnaire was used to obtain information about their age, gender, frequency, length and type of exercise while Dispositional Flow tendencies of participants in exercise environment were determined by Dispositional Flow Scale-2 (DFS-2). MANOVA was conducted to test differences in dispositional flow states with regard to gender and exercise behaviors. MANOVA results revealed no significant differences in dispositional flow between males and females (p>0.01). MANOVA results also indicated overall significant main effects for frequency (Hotelling’s T2 = 0.14; F (9,186) = 2.94; p

PDF

___

1. Asakawa K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 123–154.
2. Aşçı FH, Çağlar E, Eklund RC, Altıntaş A, Jackson S. (2007). Durumluk ve sürekli optimal performans duygu durum-2 ölçekleri’nin uyarlama çalışması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18, 4, 182-196.
3. Catley D, Duda J. (1997). Psychological antecedents of the frequency and intensity of flow in golfers. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28, 309-322.
4. Csikszentmihalyi M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: HarperCollins.
5. Csikszentmihalyi M, LeFevre J. (1989). Optimal experince in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815-822.
6. Haworth JT, Hill S. (1992). Work, leisure and psychological well being in a sample of young adults. Journal of Community & Applied Psychology, 2, 147-160.
7. Fournier J, Gaudreau P, Demontrond-Behr P, Visioli J, Forest J, Jackson SA. (2007). French translation of the flow state scale-2: Factor structure, cross-cultural invariance, and associations with goal attainment. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 897-916.
8. Grove JR, Lewis MAE. (1996). Hypnotic susceptibility and the attainment of flowlike states during exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 380-391.
9. Jackson SA, Eklund RC. (2004). The Flow Scales Manual. Morgantown, WV, USA: Fitness Information Technology, Inc.
10. Jackson SA, Marsh HW. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 17–35.
11. Jackson SA, Roberts GC. (1992). Positive performance states of athletes: Toward a conceptual understanding of peak performance. The Sport Psychologist, 6, 156–171.
12. Jackson SA, Kimiecik JC, Ford SK, Marsh HW. (1998). Psychological correlates of flow in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 20, 358–378.
13. Jackson SA, Thomas PR, Marsh HW, Smethurst CJ. (2001). Relationships between flow, self-concept, psychological skills, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 129–153.
14. Kawabata M, Mallett CJ, Jackson SA. (2008). The flow state scale and dispositional flow scale-2: Examination of factorial validity and reliability for Japanese adults. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 465-485.
15. Keller J, Bless H. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 196-209.
16. Kivikangas JM. (2006). Psychophysiology of flow experience: An explorative study. Unpublished Thesis. Department of Psychology. University of Helsinki.
17. Kowal J, Fortier MS. (2000). Testing relationships from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation using flow as a motivational consequence. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 171-181.
18. Moneta GB. (2004a). The flow experience across cultures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 2, 115-121.
19. Moneta GB. (2004b). The flow model of intrinsic motivation in Chinese: Cultural and personal. moderators. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 181–217.
20. Murcia JAM, Gimeno EC, Coll DGC. (2008). Relationship among goal orientations, motivational climate and flow in adolescents athletes: Differences by gender. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 1, 181-191.
21. Russell WD. (2001). An examination of flow state occurrence in college athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24, 1, 83-107.
22. Sharp EH, Coastsworth JD, Darling N, Cumsille P, Ranieri S. (2007). Gender differences in the self-defining activities and identity experiences of adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 251-269.
23. Stavrou NA, Zervas Y, Karteroliotis K, Jackson SA. (2007). Flow experience and athletes’ performance with refernce to the ortogonal model of flow. The Sport Psychologist, 21, 438-457.