Büşra SÜNGÜ, Dilara ÖZER

17313

Beden Eğitimi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bakış Açısından "Engelliler İçin Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Dersi" Uygulamaları

Bu araştırmanın amacı, engelliler için beden eğitimi ve spor (EBES) dersi uygulamalarını öğretmen adaylarının bakış açısı ile daha iyi anlamak ve daha nitelikli bir uygulama sürecinin planlanmasına katkı sağlamaktır. Temas kuramına (Allport, 1954) dayanan bu araştırmaya 2009 ve 2010 yılı güz yarıyıllarında EBES dersini alan toplam 84 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen 8 açık uçlu soru kullanılmış ve veriler içerik analizi ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, EBES uygulamaları unsurları başlığı altında "Temas" "Temasla dönüşmek" ve "Dönüşümün sınırlayıcıları" temaları elde edilmiştir. Sınırlı EBES ders saatlerine ve çoğu BEÖ adayının ilk kez engelli çocuklarla bir araya gelmelerine rağmen "Temasla dönüşmek" kapsamında dikkate değer olumlu değişimlerin gerçekleştiği belirlenmiştir. Dönüşümün sınırlayıcılarını dikkate alarak yapılacak düzenlemelerin ve uygulamaların temel ilkelerinin belirlenmesinin EBES uygulamalarının niteliğini artırması beklenmektedir.

"Adapted Physical Education" A Practical Course From The Perspective of Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers

TThe purpose of this study was to investigate preservicephysical education (PE) teachers' perspectivesabout "Adapted Physical Education" (APE) courseand to improve the quality of this practical course.This research was framed by Contact Theory (Allport,1954) and included 84 pre-service PE teachers whoattended the practice session of the APE course duringthe Fall 2009 and Fall 2010 semesters. Data wascollected with an open-ended questionnaire including8 questions in it. Open-ended questionnaire developedby the researchers and content analysis methodwas used to analyze the transcriptions. As a resultof this research three themes which are "Contact","Transforming with contact" and " "Restrictives oftransforming" were obtained. Although most of theundergraduate students encountered children withdisabilities first time and the APE course was limitedonly by three hours a week, one semester, within the context of the "Transforming contact" came out remarkablypositive changes. Findings suggest that planningand determining fundemantal principles of APE practicesconsidering "restrictive transforming" may provideimprovement of the teaching quality.
PDF

___

  • 1. Allport GW. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • 2. An J,Goodwn DL. (2007). Physical education for students with spina bifida: Mother's perspectives. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 24, 38-58.
  • 3. An J, Hodge SR. (2013). Exploring the meaning of parental ınvolvement in physical education for students with developmental disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 29, 147-163.
  • 4. Avramidis E, Bayliss P, Burden R. (2000). A survey into mainstream teachers' attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 191-211.
  • 5. Borko H, Mayfield V. (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11 (5), 501-518.
  • 6. Buswell DJ, Sherrill C. (1998). Scholarly publication by university women adapted physical activity professionals-preliminary results. Presented at North American Federation of Adapted Physical Activity Symposium, Minneapolis, MN.
  • 7. Chen A. (2001). A theoretical conceptualization for motivation research in physical education: An integrated perspective. Quest, 2, 35-58.
  • 8. Committee on Adapted Physical Education. (1952). Guiding principles for adapted physical education. Journal of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, 23(4), 15-28.
  • 9. Connolly M. (1994). Practicum experiences and journal writing in adapted physical education: Implications for teacher education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 11, 306-328.
  • 10. Cusimano B, Darst P, Van der Mars H. (1993). Improving your instruction through self-evaluation: Part One, Getting started. Strategies, 7 (2), 29.
  • 11. Dekker MC, Koot HM, Van der Ende J, Verhulst FC. (2002). Emotional and behavioral problems in children with and without intellectual disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 1087-1098.
  • 12. Einfeld S, Tonge BJ. (1996). Population prevalence Population prevalence of psychopathology in children and adolescents with of psychopathology in children and adolescents with intellectual disability. I. Epidemiological findings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 40, 99-109.
  • 13. Folsom-Meek SL, Nearing RJ. (1994). Pre-service physical education teachers attributes associated with positive attitudes toward students with mild disabilities (Abstract). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69(1) (Suppl.), A-100-101.
  • 14. Folsom-Meek SL, Krampf H, Nearing RJ. (1998). Relationships between pre-service personnel attributes and attitudes toward persons with disabilities. (Abstract). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69(1) (Suppl.), A-131.
  • 15. Folsom-Meek SL, Nearing R, Groteluschen W, Krampf H. (1999). Effects of academic major, gender, and hands-on experience on attitudes of preservice professionals. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 389-402.
  • 16. Folsom-Meek SL, Nearing RJ, Kalakian LH. (2000). Effects of an adapted physical education course in changing attitudes. Clinical Kinesiology, 54(3), 52-58.
  • 17. Frey G. (2003). Adapted Physical Activity Laboratory Handbook (Unpublished). Indiana University, School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation. USA.
  • 18. Gençoğlu AY. (2014). Bir kavram ve kuram üretme stratejisi olarak temellendirilmiş kuram. Tarih Okulu Dergisi (TOD) Journal of History School (JOHS) 7, XVII, 681-700.
  • 19. Hardin B. (2005). Physical education teachers' reflections on preparation for ınclusion. Physical Educator, 62 (1), 44-56.
  • 20. Hatipoğlu Özcan, G. (Ed.). (2015). Sevginin Gücü II. Aktif Yaşam Merkezi Ailelerinin Kaleminden Yaşam Öyküleri. Aktif Yaşam Merkezi Proje Kitabı. Nobel Yayınevi. Ankara.
  • 21. Hesien MLW. (2007). Teacher attitudes towards preparation for inclusion in support of a unified teacher preparation program. Postgraduate Journal of Education Research, 8(1), 49-60.
  • 22. Hodge SR. (1998). Prospective physical education teachers' attitude toward teaching students with disabilities. Physical Educator, 55(2), 68-77.
  • 23. Hodge SR, Jansma P. (1999). Effects of contact time and location of practicum experiences on attitudes of physical education majors. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 48-63.
  • 24. Hodge SR, Davis R, Woodard R, Sherrill C. (2002). Comparison of practicum types in changing preservice teachers' attitudes and perceived competence. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 155-171.
  • 25. Hodge SR, Tannehil D, Kluge MA. (2003). Exploring the meaning of practicum experiences for PETE students. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 381- 399.
  • 26. Hodge SR. (1998). Prospective physical education teachers' attitudes toward teaching students with disabilities. The Physical Educator, 55 (2).68-77.
  • 27. Jansma P. (1996). Teaching the introductory adapted physical education course. In C. Shemll(Ed.), Leadership training in adaptedphysical education (pp. 302-309). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • 28. Koskentausta T, Iivanainen M, Almqvistd F. (2004). CBCL in the assessment of psychopathology in finnish children with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25,341-354.
  • 29. Kowalski EM, Rizzo T. (1996). Factors influencing preservice student attitudes toward individuals with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13(2), 180-197.
  • 30. Loreman T, Forlin C, Sharma U. (2007). An international comparison of pre-service teacher attitudes towards inclusive education. Disability Studies Quarterly, 27 (4).
  • 31. Özdemir M. (2010). Nitel veri analizi: Sosyal bilimlerde yöntembilim sorunsalı üzerine bir çalışma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,11(1).
  • 32. Özer D. (Ed.). (2005). Sevginin Gücü; Özel Gereksinimli Çocukların Ailelerinin Kaleminden Yaşam Öyküleri. Yapa Yayınları. İstanbul.
  • 33. Özer D, Şahin G. (2010). Engelli bireyler için fiziksel aktivite: 2009-2010 çalıştayları sonuç raporu. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, XV(2), 21-28.
  • 34. Özer D, Müniroğlu S. (1998). Türkiyedeki beden eğitimi ve spor yüksekokullarının engellilere yönelik çalışmalarının incelenmesi Çağdaş Eğitim. 23(242); 21-24.
  • 35. Perlman DJ, Piletic C. (2012). The influence of an adapted physical education course on preservice teacher instruction: Using a self-determination lens. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 37(1). Article 1.
  • 36. Piletic, C. & Davis, R. (2010). A profile of the introduction to adapted physical education course within undergraduate physical education teacher education programs. ICHPER-SD Journal of Research, 5(2), 71-77.
  • 37. Roper AE, Santiago JA. (2014) Influence of servicelearning on kinesiology students' attitudes toward p-12 students with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 31, 162-180.
  • 38. Rust R., Sinelnikov O. (2010). Practicum in a self-contained environment:Pre-service teacher perceptions of teaching students with disabilities. Physical Educator, 67(1), 33-46.
  • 39. Sarol H, Ekinci E, Karaküçük S. (2011). Otistik çocuklar spor eğitim projesine gönüllü olarak katılan beden eğitimi ve spor yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin görüşleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Dergisi, Ek Sayı(67-73).
  • 40. Sebren A. (1995). Preservice teachers' reflections and knowledge development in a field-based elementary physical education methods course. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 262-283.
  • 41. Sherrill C. (2007). The passion of science: Research and creativity in adapted physical activity. Sobama Journal. Vol. 12, n.1, supplement, pp.1-5.
  • 42. Sherrill, C. (2004). Adapted Physical Activity, Recreation, and Sport. Sixth Edition. Mc Graw-Hill. pp;574.
  • 43. Sherrill C, Heikinaro-Johansson P, Slininger D. (1994). Equal-status relationships in the gym. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 65(1), 27- 31, 56.
  • 44. Slininger D, Sherrill C, Jankowski CM. (2000). Children's attitudes toward peers with severe disabilities: Revisiting contact theory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 176-196.
  • 45. Taliaferro AR, Hammond L, Wyant K. (2015). Preservice physical educators' self-efficacy beliefs toward inclusion:the impact of coursework and practicum. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 32, 49-67.
  • 46. Tjeerdsma-Blankenship B. (2008). The psychology of teaching physical education: from theory to practice. Scottsdale, AZ; Holcomb Hathaway Publishers.
  • 47. Tsangaridou N, O'Sullivan M. (1994). Using pedagogical reflective strategies to enhance reflection among preservice physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 13-33
  • 48. Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2004). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Tıpkı Basım. 4. Baskı. Sf: 174-175.
Spor Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1990
  • Yayıncı: Süleyman BULUT
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Üst Düzey Spor Örgüt Yöneticilerinin Duygusal Zeka Özelliklerini Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Çalışma

Özlem ÖZDİNÇ, F. Pervin BİLİR

İlköğretim Beden Eğitimi Dersi Tutum Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması

Yaprak Kalemoğlu VAROL, Hüseyin ÜNLÜ, Mustafa Kayıhan ERBAŞ, Ali Murat SÜNBÜL

Sporcularda Optimal Performans Duygu Durumunun Yordanmasında Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Özelliklerinin ve Mükemmeliyetçiliğin Rolü

Aydan GÖZMEN, F. Hülya AŞÇI

Beden Eğitimi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bakış Açısından "Engelliler İçin Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Dersi" Uygulamaları

Büşra SÜNGÜ, Dilara ÖZER

Beden Eğitimi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bakış Açısından “Engelliler İçin Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Dersi” Uygulamaları

Dilara ÖZER, Büşra SÜNGÜ