Eğitimsel Kazanım Yoluyla Profesyonel Yönetimsel Konumlara Ulaşan Bireyleri Neo-Marxist ve Neo-Weberci Kuramlar Çerçevesinde Çözümlemek
Bilimsel ve teknolojik gelişmeler, günümüz toplumlarında eğitimi ve bilgiyi gerektiren konumları arttırmaktadır. Eğitime ya da diplomaya sahip bireyler, profesyonel ve yönetici konumlara atanabilmektedir. Neo-Marxistler, sermaye birikiminin ve yönetiminin artan önemine, yöneticilerin sınıfsal yapıdaki rolüne değinmektedir. Profesyonel ve yönetici olarak çalışanlar, bilgilerini kullanmakta, sermaye-işgücü ilişkileri temelinde gerekli olan yönetme, yeniden üretme gibi işlevleri yerine getirmektedir. Neo-Weberciler, işin profesyonelleşmesine, eğitimin, bilginin artan önemine ve bu nedenle profesyonellerin sınıfsal yapıdaki rolüne işaret etmektedir. Hizmet sınıfı, görece olarak ayrıcalıklı iş ve piyasa durumuyla üst düzey beceriye gereksinimin duyulmadığı beyaz yakalıların yer aldığı konumlardan ayırt edilebilen yeni orta sınıfın üst kesimini göstermektedir. “Diploma”ya sahip olan bireyler, diğerlerine göre daha farklı ve üstün bir konum sağlamaktadır.
To Analyze Individuals with Educational Attainment Reached in Professional and Managerial Positions within the Framework of Neo-Marxist and Neo-Weberian Theories
The scientific and technological developments increase professional and managerial positions require education and knowledge in contemporary societies. The individual with a “diploma or educational attainment” can be appointed in professional and managerial positions. Neo-Marxists refer to the concentration of capital, the increased importance of management and hence the role of managers in the class structure. Managerial and professional workers use their knowledge and perform the functions of control, reproduction –necessary functions for capital in relation to labour. Neo-Weberians point to the professionalization of work, the increased importance of formal qualifications, education, knowledge and hence the role of professionals in the class structure. The service class is used to indicate the rise of both the managerial and professional elements of the new middle class. The service class can analyse in neo-Weberian terms in that it refers to the “upper” part of the new middle class that may distinguish from deskilled white-collar places by virtue of a relatively privileged work and market situation. The individual with a “diploma” ensures more different and superior position than the others.
___
- •ABERCROMBIE, Nicholas & URRY, John (1983), Capital, Labour and the Middle Classes, London: Allen and Unwin.
- •AHRNE, Göran (1990), “Class and Society: A Critique of John Goldthorpe’s Model of Social Classes”, (Ed.) J. Clark et al., John H. Goldthorpe: Consensus and Controversy, London: Falmer Press.
- •BRAVERMAN, Harry (1998), Labor and Monopoly Capital: the Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, New York: Monthly Review Press.
- •BURRIS, Val (1987), “The Neo-Marxist Synthesis of Marx and Weber on Class”, (Ed.) Norbert Wiley, The Marx-Weber Debate, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
- •CARCHEDI, Guglielmo (1977), The Economic Identification of Social Classes, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- •CARTER, R. (1986), “Review of Classes”, Sociological Review, Sayı: 34, ss.686-688.
- •CROMPTON, Rosemary (1998), Class and Stratification, An Introduction to Current Debates, USA: Polity Press.
- •CROMPTON, Rosemary & GUBBAY, Jon (1977), Economy and Class Structure, London: Macmillan.
- •CROMPTON, Rosemary & JONES, Gareth (1984), White Collar Proletariat, London: Macmillan.
- •DAHRENDORF, Ralf (1969), Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
- •DUKE, V. & EDGELL, S. (1987), “The Operationalization of Class in British Sociology”, British Journal of Sociology, Sayı: 38, ss.445-463.
- •EDGELL, Stephen (1993), Class, London and New York: Peter Hamilton The Open University.
- •ERIKSON, Robert & GOLDTHORPE, John H. (1993), The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- •GIDDENS, Anthony (1979), The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies, London: Hutchinson.
- •GIDDENS, Anthony (1985), “In Place of Emptiness”, New Society, Sayı: 74, ss. 383-384.
- •GILBERT, Dennis & KAHL, Joseph A. (1987), The American Class Structure (third edition), Belmont: Wadsworth
- •GOLDTHORPE, John H. (1972), “Class, Status and Party in Modern Britain: Some Recent Interpretation, Marxist and Marxisant”, European Journal of Sociology, Sayı: 13, ss. 342-372.
- •GOLDTHORPE, John H. (with Catriona Llewellyn and Clive D. Payne) (1980), Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- •LOCKWOOD, David (1989), The Blackcoated Worker, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- •MARSH, Carol (1986), “Social Class and Occupation”, (Ed.) R. Burgess, Key Variable in Social Investigation, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- •MARSHALL, Gordon (1997), Repositioning Class Social Inequality in Industrial Societies, London-Thousand Oaks-New Delhi: Sage Publications.
- •MARX, Karl (1974), Capital III, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
- •OSSOWSKİ, Stanislaw (1969), Class Structure in the Social Consciousness, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- •PENN, Roger (1981), “The Nuffield Class Categorization”, Sociology, Sayı: 15, ss. 265-271.
- •POULANTZAS, Nicos (1975), Classes in Contemporary Capitalism, London: New Left Books.
- •ROSE, David & MARSHALL, Gordon (1986), “Constructing the Wright Classes”, Sociology, Sayı: 20, ss. 440-445.
- •ROUTH, Guy (1987), Occupations of the People of Great Britain, 1801-1981, London: Macmillan.
- •SAVAGE, Mike, et al. (1992), Property, Bureaucracy and Culture, Middle-Class Formation in Contemporary Britain, London: Routledge.
- •SCOTT, John (1991), Who Rules Britain? , Cambridge: Polity.
- •STINCHCOMBE, Arthur (1989), “Education, Exploitation and Class Consciousness”, (Ed.) Erik Olin Wright, The Debate on Classes, London: Verso.
- •WEBER, Max (1961), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- •WRIGHT, Erik Olin (1979), Class Structure and Income Determination, London: Academic Press.
- •WRIGHT, Erik Olin (1980), “Class and Occupation”, Theory and Society, Sayı: 9, ss. 177-214.
- •WRIGHT, Erik Olin (1989), The Debate on Classes, London: Verso.
- WRIGHT, Erik Olin (1997), Class Counts, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
- •WRIGHT, Erik Olin (2000), Classes, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- ISSN: 1300-5642
- Yayın Aralığı: 2
- Başlangıç: 1987
- Yayıncı: Ege Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi