Erabaddage Gishan THARANGA SUMANASIRI, Mohd Shukri AB YAJID, Ali KHATIBI

Erabaddage Gishan Tharanga Sumanasiri Mohd Shukri Ab Yajid

Mezun istihdam edilebilirliğine ilgi gösterilmesine rağmen, hala tam olarak tanımlanmamış ve işlevsellendirilememiştir. Her yeni çalışmanın istihdam karmaşıklaştırdığı görülmektedir. Kavram sınırlı araştırma desteği ile teorik bir doğada kalmaktadır. Farklı paydaşların kendi perspektiflerine göre istihdam edilebilirliği tanımlama girişiminde bulunmaları nedeniyle kavramın giderek edilebilirlik yazını işveren, çalışan ve üniversite fakülteleri arasındaki bakış açılarının farklılığını ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışanların kendi istihdam edilebilirliklerine yönelik algıları onların nihai işlerini etkilemektedir ve istihdam kavramlaştırılması ve işlevsellendirilmesine alternatif bir yaklaşıma doğru evrilmektedir. İstihdam edilebilirlik algısı güçlü bir teorik altyapı ile desteklenmektedir ve istihdam edilebilirliğin altında yatan faktörlerin açıkça çoklu çalışmalar yoluyla test edilip kanıtlanmasıyla birlikte işlevsellendirilmeye edilebilirlik algısı (SPE) kavramını değerlendirmekte ve var olan yazın gözden geçirilerek gelecek çalışmalara öneriler getirmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler:

İstihdam, Öz-Algılanan-İstihdam

DEFINING AND MEASURING EMPLOYABILITY: SELF-PERCEIVED-EMPLOYABILITY (SPE) APPROACH

Despite the attention given to graduate employability, it remains to be poorly defined and operationalized. Each new study appears to complicate things further with new employability definitions. The concept appears to be theoretical in nature with limited research support. The increasing politicization of the concept, where different stakeholders attempt to define employability according to their own perspectives is a main reason for this situation. Employability literature reveals the differences of perceptions among the employees, employers, and university faculty. The perception that employees have towards their own employability appears to influence the ultimate work, and self-perceived-employability (SPE) has evolved as an alternative approach to conceptualize and operationalize employability. SPE has strong theoretical support and is ready for operationalization with clearly defined underlying factors which has been proven and tested through multiple studies. Current paper critically evaluates the concept of SPE and makes recommendations for future researchers based on review of existing literature.

Keywords:

Employability, Self-Perceived-Employability, Employability Skills Employers, Employees,

PDF

___

• Becker, G., (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Chen, G., Gully, S., and Eden, D., (2004). General Self-Efficacy and Self-Esteem: Toward Theoretical and Empirical Distinction Between Correlated Self-Evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), pp. 375-395.
• Cotton, K., (1993). Developing Employability Skills, s.l.: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
• Cuyper, N.D., et al., (2014). Perceived Employability and Performance: Moderation by Felt Job Insecurity. Personnel Review, 43(4), pp. 536-552.
• Dries, N., Forrier, A., Vos, A.D., and Pepermans, R., (2014). Self-Perceived Employability, Organization-Rated Potential, and the Psychological Contract. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), pp. 565-581.
• Finch, D.F., Hamilton, L.K., Riley, B., and Zehner, M., (2013). An Exploratory Study of Factors Affecting Undergraduate Employability. Education + Tranining, 55(7), pp. 681-70.
• Harvey, L., (2010). Defining and Measuring Employability. Quality in Higher Education, 7(2), pp. 97-109.
• Hillage, J. and Pollard, E., (1998). Employability: Developing a Framework for Policy Analysis, London: Department for Education and Employment.
• Kim, S., Kim, H., and Lee, J., (2015). Employee Self-Concepts, Voluntary Learning Behavior, and Perceived Employability. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(3), pp. 264-279.
• Kirves, K., Kinnunen, U., Cuyper, N.D., and Mäkikangas, A., (2014). Trajectories of Perceived Employability and Their Associations with Well-Being at Work. Journal of Personnel Psychology, Volume 13, pp. 46-57.
• Knight, P.T. and Yorke, M., (2002). Employability through the Curriculum. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(4), pp. 261-276.
• Markus, H., (1977). Self-Schemata and Processing Information about the Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), pp. 63-78.
• NCIHE, (1997). Higher Education in the Learning Society [Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education: 'The Dearing Report'], s.l.: Norwich: HMSO.
• Pierce, J.L., Gardner, D.G., Cummings, L.L., and Dunham, R.B., (1989). Organization-Based Self-Esteem: Construct Definition, Measurement, and Validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), pp. 622-648.
• Pool, L.D. and Sewell, P., (2007). The Key to Employability: Developing a Practical Model of Graduate Employability. Education + Training, Volume: 49, pp. 277-289.
• Rae, D., (2007). Connecting Enterprise and Graduate Employability: Challenges to the Higher Education Culture and Curriculum. Education + Training, 49(8/9), pp. 605-619.
• Robbins, L., (1963). Report of the Committee on Higher Education. [Online] Available at: http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/small/cab-129-114-c-173.pdf[Accessed 29 January 2014].
• Rosenberg, S., Heimler, R., and Morote, E.-S., (2012). Basic Employability Skills: A Triangular Design Approach. Education + Training, 54(1), pp. 7-20.
• Rothwell, A. and Arnold, J., (2007). Self-Perceived Employability: Development and Validation of a Scale. Personal review, 36(1), pp. 23-41.
• Study, D.J. and Kottke, J.L., (2014). Another Model of Employability? Considering the RAW Framework, California: Presented at the 26th Association for Psychological Sciences Annual Convention, San Francisco, CA.
• Tymon, A., (2013). The Student Perspective of Employability. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), pp. 841-856.
• Wickramasinghe, V. and Perera, L., (2010). Graduates’, University Lecturers’ and Employers’ Perceptions towards Employability Skills. Education + Training, 52(3), pp. 226-244.