EVALUATION OF EXCESS LIFETIME CANCER RISK CAUSED BY EXTERNAL EXPOSURE DUE TO NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY IN BOLU, TURKEY

In this study, the gamma dose rates in outdoor air at seventy-seven points around Bolu province were meausured using a counter (Eberline, ESP-2). Radiological hazards were evaluated by estimating the excess lifetime cancer risks caused by external exposure. The gamma dose rates measured varied from 11 to 68 nGyh-1with an average value of 22 nGy h-1. The avarege value of the corresponding outdoor annual effective dose and the excess lifetime cancer risk was found as 27.23 μSv and 0.95x10−4, respectively. These values could be compared to other studies which existed in Turkey and also in the world.

___

  • [1]UNSCEAR, Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly, United Nations, NY, (2008).
  • [2]Bolu Province/ Wikipedia. Bolu Province/ Wikipedia.
  • [3] Bolu map/ http://cografyaharita.com/haritalarim/4l_bolu_ili_haritasi.png
  • [4] Software for drawing was used by CNAEM/TAEK.
  • [5] http://www.pchemlabs.com/manuals/pdf/eberline-esp2-technical-manual.pdf
  • [6] ICRP., ICRP Publication 103 recommendations of the ICRP: annals of the ICRP volume 37/2-4. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Pergamon Pres, 2007, Oxford, UK.
  • [7] Değerlier, M.,KARAHAN G. (2007). Ph.D. Thesis: Annual Effective Dose of Natural Environmental Radioactivity Measurements for Adana region. N.S. Institue- CU/ Adana.
  • [8] Enis Kapdan, et all., Outdoor radioactivity and health risk assessment for capital city Ankara, Turkey, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 318 (2018), 1033-1042, doi: 10.1007/s10967-018-6060-5.
  • [9] Yaşar Kobya, et all., (2015), Evaluation of Outdoor Gamma Dose Rate and Cancer Risk in Artvin Province, Turkey, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 21:8, 2077-2085, doi: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1017876.
  • [10] E. Kapdan., et. All, Outdoor Radioactivity and Health Risks in Balıkesir, Northwestern Turkey, Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2011), pp: 1-9, doi:10.1093/rpd/ncr038.
  • [11] E. Kam, et all., A study of background radioactivity level for Canakkale, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess (2010), 168:685-690, doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1143-y.
  • [12] G. Karahan, A. Bayülken, Assessment of gamma dose rates around Istanbul (Turkey), Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 47 (2000), 213-221, doi: 10.1016/S0265-931X(99)00034-X
  • [13] E. Kam,et all., Environmental radioactivity measurements in Kastamonu region of northearn Turkey, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, (2006), V.65, pp. 440-444., doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.11.005
  • [14] E. Kam, et all., Assessment of environmental radioactivity for Sanliurfa region of southeastern Turkey, Radiat. Meas., 42 (2007), 1387-1391, doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.05.052
  • [15] M. E. Turgay, et all., (2015). Ph.D. Thesis: Assessment of the Environmental Radioactivity in Hatay region. N.S. Institue- GAUN/G.Antep.
  • [16] Muttalip Ergun TURGAY, Cancer Risk Determination for IDA villages by using Annual Gamma Doses in Air, around Edremit&Ayvacık Districts; Balıkesir&Çanakkale, TURKEY, European Journal of Science and Technology, (2019), 15, pp: 433-439, EJOSAT, doi: 10.31590/ejosat.512562
  • [17] Lic´ınio MV, et al. 2013. A high spatial resolution outdoor dose rate map of the Rio de Janeiro city, Brasil, risk assessment and urbanization effects. J Environ Radioact 126:32-9., doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.07.012
  • [18] Ghiassi M., Mortazavi S. M., Cameron J. R. (2002). Very High Background Areas of Ramsar, Persia: Preliminary Biological Studies, Health Physics, 82(1), 87-93.
  • [19] M. A. Arnedo, et all, (2017), Mapping Natural Radioactivity of soils in the eastern Canary Islands, Spain, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 166, pp: 242-258, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.010
  • [20]Bayrak, K , Yümün, Z , Çakar, M . (2020). Investigation of Outdoor Gamma Dose Rates in Yalova, Turkey. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (18), 568-573. DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.686668