Zafer EREN, C. Erhan BOZDAĞ

16228

NORM SHIFTING: AN AGENT-BASED MODEL

This paper aims to explain how norms change in the social world through agent-based modelling. Norms are rules, the roots of which lie in society to guide people to perform expected behaviours. Norms exist as sui generis in societies; however, they are improved and transformed by individuals in time. While norms are rather salient for some behaviours, they are subtle for others. The plurality of norms is one of the reasons for this ambiguity. Norm plurality occurs in societies where groups that have different norms for the same behaviour live together and interact constantly. Beyond that, norm differences are the basis on which different groups are defined. How do people change the norms that are already adopted, or how do adopted norms shift to opposite ones? This paper tries to explain norm shifts when there is more than one norm for a specific behaviour in an artificial society in accordance with certain factors: the minority/majority group’s norm, group pressure, and loyalty of the individual. Agent-based modelling is a useful tool to understand the social world and create an artificial one. Agents shift their norms to interact with other agents. Results of the simulations show that minority or majority, group pressure, and loyalty are highly effective in norm shifting.
Keywords:

Norms, agent-based modelling, minority group group pressure, group polarization,

PDF

___

  • [1] Elsenbroich C. and Gilbert N., (2014) Modelling Norms, Dordrecht: Springer.
  • [2] Savarimuthu B. T. R., Cranefield S., Purvis M. A. and Purvis M. K., (2013) Identifying Prohibition Norms in Agent Societies, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 21(1), 1-46.
  • [3] Brauer M. and Chaurand N., (2010) Descriptive Norms, Prescriptive Norms, and Social Control: An Intercultural Comparison of People's Reactions to Uncivil Behaviors, European Journal of Psychology, 40, 490-499.
  • [4] Mason W. A., Conrey F. R. and Smith E. R., (2007) Situating Social Influence Processes: Dynamic, Multidirectional Flows of Influence within Social Networks, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11 (3), 279-300.
  • [5] Gilbert N., (2004) Agent-based Social Simulation: Dealing with Complexity, The Complex Systems Network of Excellence, 9(25), 1-14.
  • [6] Macal C. M. and North M. J., (2010) Tutorial on Agent-based Modelling and Simulation, Journal of Simulation, 4(3), 151-162.
  • [7] Siebers P. O., Macal C. M., Garnett J., Buxton D. and Pidd M., (2010) Discrete-event Simulation is Dead, Long Live Agent-based Simulation!, Journal of Simulation, 4(3), 204-210.
  • [8] Helbing D., Yu W., Opp K.-D. and Rauhut H., (2014) Conditions for the Emergence of Shared Norms in Populations with Incompatible Preferences, PloS One, 9(8), e104207.
  • [9] Jackson J. C., Rand D., Lewis K., Norton M. I. and Gray K., (2017) Agent-based modeling: A guide for Social Psychologists, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 387-395.
  • [10] Xenitidou M. and Elsenbroich C., (2011) Construct Validity of Agent-based Simulation of Normative Behaviour, The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(4), 67-80.
  • [11] Jung J., Bramson A. and Crano W. D., (2018) An agent-based model of indirect minority influence on social change and diversity, Social Influence, 13(1), 18-38.
  • [12] Verhagen H., (2001) Simulation of the Learning of Norms, Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 296-306.
  • [13] Andrighetto G., Villatoro D. and Conte R., (2010) Norm Internalization in Artificial Societies, AI Communications, 23(4), 325-339.
  • [14] Epstein J. M., (2001) Learning to Be Thoughtless: Social Norms and Individual Computation, Computatitonal Economics, 18, 9-24.
  • [15] Neumann M., (2008) Homo Socionicus: A Case Study of Simulation Models of Norms, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(4), 6.
  • [16] Hollander C. D. and Wu A. S., (2011) The Current State of Normative Agent-Based Systems, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 14(2), 6.
  • [17] Sutcliffe A. and Wang D., (2012) Computational Modelling of Trust and Social Relationships, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 15(1), 3.
  • [18] Axelrod R., (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: NY: Basic Books.
  • [19] Nowak A., Szamrej J. and Latané B., (1990) From Private Attitude to Public Opinion: A Dynamic Theory of Social Impact, Psychological Review, 97(3), 362-376.
  • [20] Muldoon R., Lisciandra C., Bicchieri C., Hartmann S. and Sprenger J., (2013) On The Emergence of Descriptive Norms, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 13(1), 3-22.
  • [21] Cooley C. H., (1909) Primary Groups, Social Organization, New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, 23-31.
  • [22] Sutcliffe A. G., Dunbar R. I. M., Binder J. and Arrow H., (2012) Relationships and the Social Brain: Integrating Psychological and Evolutionary Perspectives, British Journal of Psychology, 103(2), 149-168.
  • [23] Sutcliffe A.G., Dunbar R. I. M. and Wang D., (2016) Modelling the Evolution of Social Structure, PloS One, 11(7), e0158605.
  • [24] Sherif M., (1936) The Psychology of Social Norms, Oxford, England: Harper.
  • [25] Asch S. E., (1951) Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments, Documents of Gestalt Psychology, Ed. Guetzkow H., Pittsburg, The Carnegie Press, 222-236.
  • [26] Milgram S., Bickman L. and Berkowitz L., (1969) Note on the Drowing Power of Crowds of Different Size, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 57-75.
  • [27] Latané B., (1981) The Psychology of Impact, American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
  • [28] Moscovici S., (1976) Social Influence and Social Change, New York: Academic Press.
  • [29] Moscovici S., (1985) Innovation and Minority Influence, Perspectives on Minorty Influence, Eds. Moscovici S., Mugny G. and van Avermaet E., 3. ed., Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 9-52.
  • [30] Ajzen I. and Fishbein M., (1973) Attitudinal and Normative Variables as Predictors of Specific Behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 41-57.
  • [31] Ajzen I., (1985) From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, Action-control: From Cognition to Behavior, Eds. Kuhl J. and Beckmann J., Heidelberg: Springer, 11-39.
  • [32] Cialdini R. B., Reno R. R. and Kallgren C. A., (1990) A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: Recycling the Concept of Norms to Reduce Littering in Public, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026.
  • [33] Eriksson K., Strimling P. and Coultas J. C., (2015) Bidirectional Associations Between Descriptive and Injunctive Norms, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (129), 59-69.
  • [34] Epstein J. M., (1999) Agent‐based Computational Models and Generative Social Science, Complexity, 4(5), 41-60.
  • [35] Bonabeau E., (2002) Agent-based Modeling: Methods and Techniques for Simulating Human Systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl 3), 7280-7287.
  • [36] Troitzsch K. G., (2013) Historical Introduction, Simulating Social Complexity, A Handbook, Berlin, Springer, 13-22.
  • [37] Smith E. R. and Conrey F. R., (2007) Agent-based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 87-104.
  • [38] Schelling T. C., (1971) Dynamic Models of Segregation, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143-186.
  • [39] Ostrom T. M., (1988) Computer Simulation: The Third Symbol System, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 381-392.
  • [40] Neumann M., (2010) Norm Internalisation in Human and Artificial Intelligence, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 13(1), 12.
  • [41] Savarimuthu B. T. R. and Cranefield S., (2011) Norm Creation, Spreading and Emergence: A Survey of Simulation Models of Norms in Multi-Agent Systems, Multiagent and Grid Systems, 7(1), 21-54.
  • [42] Frantz C. K. and Pigozzi G., (2018) Modelling Norm Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems, Journal of Applied Logics—IFCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 5(2), 491-563.
  • [43] Mahmoud S., Griffiths N., Keppens J. and Luck M., (2017) Establishing Norms with Metanorms over Interaction Topologies, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 31(6), 1344-1376.
  • [44] Alam S. J., Geller A. and Tsvetovat M., (2012) Networks in Agent-based Social Simulation, Agent-based Models of Geographical Systems, Dordrecht: Springer, 199-216.
  • [45] Guo H., Hobbs B. F., Lasater M. E., Parker C. L. and Winch P. J., (2016) System Dynamics-based Evaluation of Interventions to Promote Appropriate Waste Disposal Behaviors in Low-income Urban Areas: A Baltimore Case Study, Waste Management, 56, 547-560.
  • [46] Dunbar R. I. M., (1993) Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size and Language in Humans, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 164(4), 681-694.
  • [47] Dunbar R. I. M. and Spoors M., (1995) Social Networks, Support Cliques, and Kinship, Human Nature, 6(3), 273-290.
  • [48] Dunbar R. I. M., (2003) The Social Brain: Mind, Language, and Society in Evolutionary Perspective, Annual Review of Anthropology, 32(1), 163-181.
Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-7191
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Sermin ELEVLİ

Banu YILMAZ, Egemen ARAS, Murat KANKAL, Sinan NACAR

Yunus GÜNER, Emre ERCAN, Ayhan NUHOĞLU, Duygu ÖZTÜRK

Selami DEMİR

Kubra ULUCAN ALTUNTAS, Fatih ILHAN, Can DOGAN, Ugur KURT

Burak TURKAN, Akin Burak ETEMOGLU

Nihat KABAY, Nausad MIYAN

Yunus Emre YILMAZ, Mustafa GÜRSOY

Hakan ADIGÜZEL

Abdulkadir ATALAN, Nergis Feride KAPLAN DÖNMEZ, Cem Çağrı DÖNMEZ