Pozitivist-Ampirik Araştırmalarda İnsan: Yanıltmacanın Dünü, Bugünü ve Yarını - 1

Turizm alanyazınında niceliksel artışa karşın ham, bitkin, taklitçi, cansız niteliksel yoksunluğun varlığına dikkat çekmeyi amaçlayan bu iki parçalı çalışmada öncelikle turizm konulu akademik çalışmaların yer aldığı sosyal bilimlerde giderek ağırlığını hissettiren bürokratik kurallara, memurlaşan biz akademisyenlere ve düşünce kısırlığı yaratan kurnaz pozitivist-ampirik statükoya ışık tutulmakta, takibinde ansal ve geriye dönük bakışla kurmaca gerçekliğin nasıl türetildiği irdelenmektedir. Bir sürü “izm” etkilerinin görüldüğü pozitivist-ampirik araştırmalarda popüler kültürün etkisi; sentetik eklektizmin eleştirisi yapılmakta, yeni yön arayışında “belirsizlik” ve “ikicilik” unsuruna özellikle değinilmektedir. “P” hoyratlığı eleştirisinin ardından insanın turizm araştırmalarının neresinde olduğu sorgulanmakta, turizm araştırmalarına yerleştiğimiz yanlış inançlar eleştirilmektedir. İkinci çalışmada ise turizm araştırmalarının içinde yer aldığı sistemde baş gösteren yapısal sorunlara ışık tutulmaktadır. Bilgi üretiminde normal dağılımı engelleyen, bir tür ayrımcılık görüntüsündeki SSCI ve dergi etki faktörü gibi icatların bilimde emeğin sömürülmesine ve faydalı bilimin sonlanmasına neden olabileceği; atıf kartellerinin nasıl oluştuğu ve çalıştığı; “yayınla ya da yok ol” un nasıl “yayınla ve yok ol” a dönüştüğü; sorunsallaştırma yerine boşluk doldurmaya çalışmanın faydasızlığı, pozitivist-ampirik çalışmalardaki olası McNamara yanılgısı, Parkinson ve Peter ilkeleri ışığında bilimperestlik ve etkileri gibi konular ele alınmaktadır.

___

Al, U. ve Soydal, İ . (2015). Bilimsel iletiş imin farklı bir yüzü: Geri çekilen makaleler [The other face of scholarly communication: Retracted articles]. Içinde Prof. Dr. İrfan Çakın’a Armağ an (Umut Al & Zehra Taş kın Eds.) (ss. 22-37). Ankara: Hacettepe University, Department of Information Management.
Alrawadieh, Z. ve Zareer, A. (2019) Exploring Retraction in Tourism and Hospitality Journals. European Journal of Tourism Research 22, pp. 20-30
Archambault, É., ve Larivière, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 639-653
Ayres, I. ve Vars, F. E. (2000). Determinants of citations to articles in elite law reviews. Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 427-450.
Bakker, M. ve Wichrts, J.M. (2011). The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behav Res Methods. 43(3):666-78.
Bar-Ilan, J. ve Halevi, G. (2017). Post retraction citations in context: a case study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629243/
Beaver DB (2004) Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics 60:399–408
Bornemann-Cimenti H, Szilagyi IS, Sandner-Kiesling A. (2015). Perpetuation of retracted publications using the example of the Scott S. Reuben case: Incidences, reasons and possible improvements. Science Engineering Ethics. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150092
Bornmann, L. ve Daniel, D. H. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal OF documentation, 64(1):45-80
Bornmann, L. ve Daniel, D. H. (2005). Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Analysis of reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions. Scientometrics, 63, 297-320.
Brainard, J. ve You, J. (2018). What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty’. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted- papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty
Budd JM, Sievert M, Schultz TR, Scoville C. (1999). Effects of article retraction on citation and practice in medicine. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. 87(4):437
Butler, W. R. (1980). The concept of a tourıst area cycle of evolutıon: ımplıcatıons for management of resources. Canadian Geographer., 24: 5-12.
Craig, R., Cox, A., Tourish, D. ve Thorpe, A. (2020). Using retracted journal articles in psychology to understand research misconduct in the social sciences: What is it to be done?. Research policy. 49: 1-9.
Cronin, B. (2005a) The hand of science. Academic writing and its rewards, Lanham, MD, USA, Scarecrow Press. 
Cronin, B. (2005b) A hundred million acts of whimsy? Current Science, 89, 1505-1509. Dora Decleration. https://sfdora.org
Eichorn, P. ve Yankauer, A. (1987). Do authors check their references - a survey of accuracy of references in 3 public-health journals. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 1011-1012.
Evans, J. T., Nadjarı, H. I. ve Burchell, S. A. (1990) Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals - a continuing peer-review problem. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 1353-1354.
Fiedler, K., ve Schwarz, N. (2015). Questionable Research Practices Revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52.
Fire, M. ve Guestrin, C. (2019). Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action . Giga science. 8; 1-20.
Fister I Jr., Fister I & Perc M (2016)Toward the Discovery of CitationCartels in Citation Networks. Front. Phys. 4:49.
Fodness, D. ve Murray, B. (1999). A Model of Tourist Information Search Behavior. Journal of Travel Research, 37(3): 220-230
Fong EA ve Wilhite AW (2017) Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0187394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187394
Gross, P. L. K. ve Gross, E. M. (1927) College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-389. 
Halevi, G. ve Bar-Ilan, J. (2016). Post retraction citations in context. In BIRNDL 2016 Bibliometric- enhanced Information Retrieval and Natural Language Processing for Digital Libraries (p. 23-29). Newark: CEUR
Hesselmann, F., Graf, V. Schmidt, M., ve , Reinhart. M. (2017). The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5600261/
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., ve Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the pre- valence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524–532. doi:10.1177/ 0956797611430953
Kochan CA, ve Budd JM. The persistence of fraud in the literature: The Darsee case. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1992;43(7):488– 493.
Laurence, J. P. ve Hull, R. (1971) The Peter Principle. Londra. Pan Books Ltd.
Letrud K. ve Hernes S (2019) Affirmative citation bias in scientific myth debunking: A three- in-one case study. PLoS ONE 14(9): e0222213.
Maslow, A. H. (1967) A Theory of Metamotivation : the Biological Rooting of the Value- Life First Published October 1, Journal of Humanistic Psychology.
Munafo, M. R., Hollands, J. G. & Marteau, M. T. (2018). Open science prevents mindless science. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193470/
Parkinson, C. N. (1957). Parkinson’s Law and other studies in administration. Cambridge Mass. Hougton Miffi Co.
Pfeifer MP, Snodgrass GL. (1990). The continued use of retracted, invalid literature. JAMA. 263(10):1420–1423. doi: 10.1001/jama.1990.03440100140020.
Robinson-Garcia, N. , Jiménez-Contreras, E., ve Torres-Salinas, D (2015). Analyzing data citation practices using the Data Citation Index. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67(12): 1-20.
Simkin M.V. ve Roychowdhur, V.P. (2002). Read before you cite! https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0212043.pdf
Taşkın, Z. ve Al, U. (2017). A content-based citation analysis study based on text categorisation. Scientometric.114 (1): 335-357.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005a) Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62, 133-143.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005b) For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3, 50-62. 
Wang, X., Weaver, D., Li, X., ve Zhang, Y. (2016) In Butler (1980) we trust? Typology of citer motivations. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305698277_In_Butler_1980_we_ trust_Typology_of_citer_motivations[accessed Feb 10 2020].
Wilhite AW ve Fong EA. (2012). Coercive Citations in Academic Publishing. Science 2012; 3 Feb:542–543. pmid:22301307
Zarezadeh, Z., Benckendorff, P. ve Gretzel, U. (2018). Lack of progress in tourist information search research: a critique of citation behaviour and knowledge development, Current Issues in Tourism, DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2018.1459511