Bolkar Dağlarının Acmaeoderini (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Tribusu Türlerinin Tuzak Tercihleri ve Mevsimsel Dağılışları

Tuzak çeşitlerinin etkinliği; araştırma yöntemi, örnekleme, popülasyon yoğunluğu, mevsimsel dağılış gibi hususlarda böceklerin izlenmesi ve değerlendirilmesi için önemlidir. Bu çalışma ile Bolkar Dağlarında farklı yakalama yöntemleri kullanılarak yakalanan Acmaeoderini böcek türlerinin tuzak yöntemleri karşılaştırılması ve bu türlerin mevsimsel dağılışları değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma alanında Acmaeoderini tribusuna ait toplam 815 örnek yakalanmıştır. Yakalanan bu örneklerden Acmaeodera cinsine ait 14 tür ve Acmaeoderella cinsine ait 9 tür tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada Heydemann sınıflandırmasına göre 3 dominant, 3 subdominant, 10 rare ve 7 subrare tür tespit edilmiştir. Yakalama yöntemlerinden atrap yöntemi 572 örnek sayısı ilk sırada yer alırken, çukur tuzak yöntemi 1 örnek sayısı ile son sırada yer almıştır. Biyoçeşitlilik açısından atrap ile 22 tür, su tuzağı ile 12 tür, yapışkan tuzak ile 8 tür ve çukur tuzak ile 1 tür yakalanmıştır. Acmaeoderini tribusuna ait Nisan ayında 1, Mayıs ayında 187, Haziran ayında 257, Temmuz ayında 336, Ağustos ayında ise 34 örnek yakalanmıştır.

Trap Preferences and Seasonal Distribution of Tribus Acmaeoderini (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) of Bolkar Mountains

The efficiency of trap varieties is an important factor for monitoring insects in terms of faunistic research, sampling, evaluation of population density, seasonal distribution criteria. In this study, the comparison of the trapping methods of the insect species in the Acmaeoderini tribus caught using different capture methods in Bolkar Mountains and the seasonal distribution of these species were evaluated. A total of 815 samples belonging to the Acmaeoderini tribus were caught in the study area. 14 species belonging to the Acmaeodera genus and 9 species belonging to the Acmaeoderella genus were determined from these samples. Within the scope of the study, 3 dominant, 3 subdominant, 10 rare and 7 subrare species were identified. Among the capture methods, the net trap method ranked first with 572 samples, while the pit trap method took the last place with 1 sample number. In terms of biodiversity, 22 species were caught with a net trap, 12 species with a water trap, 8 species with a sticky trap and 1 species with pit trap. Acmaeoderini tribus was caught 1 in April, 187 in May, 257 in June, 336 in July and 34 in August.

___

  • Bellamy CL (2000). Buprestidae (Coleoptera, Buprestoidea). Dâures - biodiversity of the Brandberg Massif, Namibia. CimbebasiaMemoir 9: 185–191.
  • Bellamy CL (2008). A World Catalogue and Bibliography of the Jewel Beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestoidea), Volume 1: Introduction; Fossil Taxa; Schizopodidae; Buprestidae: Julodinae – Chrysochroinae: Poecilonotini. Sofia–Moscow, Pensoft Publishers. 625 pp.
  • Bouget C, Brustel H, Bri A, Noblecourt T (2008). Sampling saproxylic beetles with window flight traps: methodological insights. Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie), suppt. 10.
  • Evans HF., Moraal LG, Pajeres JA. (2007). Biology, ecology and economic importance of Buprestidae and Cerambycidae. In: Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Gregoire J-C, Evans HF (eds) Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Springer, Dordrecht, 447-474.
  • Ghobaria H, Nozarib J, Kalashian M (2013). Investigation of Buprestidae Diversity by Using Different Traps in Rangelands of Kurdistan Province-Iran. Soaj Entomological Studies. Vol:2 57-61.
  • Lhoir, J., Fagot, J., Thieren, Y., Wilson. G., 2003. Efficacité du piégeage, par les méthodesclassiques, des Coléoptèressaproxyliques en régionWallonne (Belgique). Notes fauniques de Gembloux. 50, 49-61.
  • Lodos N, Tezcan S (1995). Türkiye Entomolojisi V: Buprestidae" Entomoloji Derneği Yayınları, 8:1-138.
  • Muskovits J, Hegyessy G (2002). Magyarország díszbogarai. Jewel beetles of Hungary (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Grafon Kıado Nagykovacsı, 1-404.
  • Oliver JB, Fare D, Youssef N, Klingeman W (2004). A survey trap to monitor adult flat headed borer activity in nurseries, pp. H-1. In M. E. Lewis [ed.], Proc. 26th Ann. University-Wide Res. Sympos Teennessee State University 6-8 April 2004. Nashville TN.
  • Sakalian V, Langourov M (2004). Colour trap a method for distributional and ecological investigations of Buprestidae (Coleoptera). Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae. 68: 53-59.
  • Tezcan S (1995). Contribution to the study of the genere Acmaeodera Eschscholtz and Acmaeoderella Cobos (Coleoptera, Buprestidae, Acmaeoderinae) of Turkey. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi 19(1): 69-79.
  • Varandi H B, Kalashian M, Barari H, Taleshi SAR (2018). The diversity of wood-boring beetles caught by different traps in northern forests of Iran. Tropical Drylands 2(2): 65-74.
  • Volkovitsh MG (1979). Review of the Palaearctic groups of Jewel Beetles of the tribe Acmaeoderini (Coleoptera, Buprestidae). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 58(2): 333–354.
  • Volkovitsh MG (2006). New nomenclatorial and taxonomic acts, and comments. Buprestidae: Polycestinae and Buprestinae. pp. 56-58; Catalogue. Buprestidae: Polycestinae. pp. 330-342. – In: Löbl I., A. Smetana (Eds). Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Volume 3. – Scarabaeoidea – Scirtoidea – Dascilloidea – Buprestoidea – Byrrhoidea. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 690 pp.
  • Volkovitsh MG (2008). A review of the Buprestid genus Cochinchinula Volk. with description of new taxa from Thailand, and notes on the composition and classification of the tribe Acmaeoderini (Coleoptera, Buprestidae, Polycestinae.). Entomological Review, 88(3): 329-349.
  • Volkovitsh MG, Sakalian V, Georgiev G (2015). A Checklist and a Key to the Taxa of the Subfamily Polycestinae Lacordaire, 1857 (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Bulgaria. Acta zoologica bulgarica 67(4): 471-478.
  • Werner RA. (2002). Effect of ecosystem disturbance on diversity of bark and wood-boring beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae) in white spruce (picea gluca (Moench) Voss) ecosystem of Alaska. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-546. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Portland, OR.