Using The Response Surface Method to Determine Optimum Temperature and Gam Usage in Egg Storage

Response surface method (RSM) is a form of optimization based on the creation of an empirical model for evaluating the relationship between factor levels and the responses obtained therefrom. RSM is a multivariate analysis created by applying multiple regression and space geometry together. This optimization method can also be used as a preliminary stage of factorial experiments, since factor levels determine the optimum points before a factorial experiment. In this way, since the difference between the factor levels will be less, it provides more healthy results. In other words, optimization is used to increase the significance and sensitivity of factor levels.In this study, 130 table chicken eggs were divided into 9 groups according to their storage temperatures and percentages of coating gam arabic matter. Weight losses during the 28-day storage period of eggs were calculated. The eggs were weighed on the 7th day, the 14th day, the 21st day, and the 28th day. After the study was completed, the differences of the weights on the first day and 28th day were calculated. While applying RSM, Central Composite Design trial pattern was used. As a result of the analysis, optimum storage temperature and gam arabic composition were determined for egg storage with RSM. According to the results of the statistical analysis, at the end of the 4th week, it was determined that the optimum storage temperature and gum substance composition for the minimum egg weight loss (1.58 g) were 7.64-8.24 oC and 15%. When the results of the study and the results obtained from the analysis are compared, it is thought that RSM has obtained an intermediate dose estimation for the minimum egg weight loss in optimization of egg preservation conditions and this may be beneficial in the field of animal breeding.

PDF

___

Anonymous (2018). Response surface methodology,Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wi ki/Response_surface_methodology: [20.06.2020].

Banga JR, Balsa-Canto E, Moles CG, Alonso AA (2003). Improving food processing using modern optimization methods.Trends in Food Science & Technology 14(4): 131-144.

Box GE, Hunter, JS (1957). Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 28(1), 195-241.

Box GE, Draper NR (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces, Wiley New York, p.

Box GE, Wilson KB (1992). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions, In: Breakthroughs in statistics, Eds: Springer, p. 270- 310.

Brereton RG (2003). Chemometrics: data analysis for the laboratory and chemical plant, John Wiley & Sons, p.

Montgomery DC (2001). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, USA, John Wiley & Sons, p. 427-457.

Namdev V, Singh AK, Patidar P, Pradhan M (2014). Multi-criteria Decision Making for the Optimization of Machining Process Parameters in EDM.

Saguy I, Mishkin MA, Karel M, Teixeira AA (1984). Optimization methods and available software. Part 1, Critical Reviews in Food Science & Nutrition 20(4): 275-299.

Sanders AM, Edwards Jr HM, Rowland III GN (1992). Calcium and phosphorus requirements of the very young turkey as determined by response surface analysis.British journal of nutrition 67(3): 421-435.

Teja BS, Muneiah T (2018). Mechanical Characterization, Influence of Process Parameters and Magnetic Field on Machining Characteristics of Al/Cu Metal Matrix Composites in EDM. İnternational Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology Research 1832-1836.

Yılmaz MT (2002). Response Surface Modelling For The Effect Of Nitrite, Glucono Delta Lactone And Ascorbic Acid On Various Characteristics Of Turkish Style Fermented Sausage,Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science, Food Engineering Department. Istanbul Turkey.