The Approaches of the Contracting Companies to the Housing Landscape in Konya Province

Today's residences show highly functional and qualified formations and offer many functions to their users. One of the most important factors that increase the housing function and aesthetics is the housing landscape. In this study; the opinions and experiences of the contractor companies that have implemented housing projects in line with the supply and demands of the users have been determined. A survey was conducted through face-to-face interviews with 97 house producer company officials affiliated to Konya Contractors Association. In the first part of the questionnaire, the approaches to projecting the housing landscape and the factors that affect the project process are questioned. In the second part, landscape application approaches, various professional groups in the application stages, quality and characteristics of the application are present-ed. In the third section, the economic and financial evaluations of the residen-tial landscape are made and the values that the landscape adds to the housing through projects and applications are determined. In the last part of the ques-tionnaire, the satisfaction levels of the contractors and their customers were measured based on the experience of the contractors. According to the find-ings; 89 out of 97 company officials show a positive approach to constructing landscape projects. In addition, 49 company officials stated that the effective-ness of the landscape in housing prices is high and very high.

PDF

___

Bayraktar E (2007). Bir İnsanlık Hakkı Konut, İstan-bul, Boyut Yayıncılık, p.

Broto C (2000). Residential Architecture, Barcelona, p. 9.

Carr S, Francis M, Rivlin LG, Stone AM (1992). Pub-lic Space, New York, Cambridge University Press, p.

Chiesura A (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city, Landscape and Urban Planning, 68 (1), 129-138.

Çınar S (2008). Ev Bahçesinde Peyzaj Tasarımı Süreci, İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 58 (1), 73-90.

Edwards B, Sibley M, Hakmi M, Land P (2005). Courtyard Housing, New York, Taylor & Francis, p. 297.

Gül A, Küçük V (2001). Kentsel Açik-Yeşil Alanlar Ve Isparta Kenti Örneğinde İrdelenmesi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 27-48.

Gül G, 2012, gayrimenkul yatırımcısı inşaat firma-larında konut pazarlama yönetimi süreci, Yüksek Lisans, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul.

Keleş R (2008). Kentleşme politikası. Ankara, İmge Kitabevi, p.

Kırgızoğlu MI (1995), Peyzaj Kavramı ve Şehir Plan-lamasında Kullanımı, Erzurum, Atatürk Üniversi-tesi Ziraat Fakültesi, p. 1.

Newbold P (1995). Statistics for Business and Eco-nomics. Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey, 867 p.

Per AF, Mozas J, Ollero AS (2013). 10 Stories of Col-lective Housing, Spain, a+t architecture publishers, p.

Polat AT, Önder S (2012). Kentsel Peyzaj: Tasarım Ve Uygulamaya Yönelik Bazı Öneriler, Kentsel Peyzaj Alanlarının Oluşumu ve Bakım Esasları Semineri, 97-116.

Sherer PM (2003). Why America Needs More City Parks and Open Space, The Trust For Public Land, 1-32.

Şişman EE, Korkut AB, Etli B (2008). Tekirdağ Valiliği Tören ve Park Alanı Peyzaj Tasarım Sü-reci, Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5 (2), 119-129.

Smith C, Clayden A, Dunnett N (2008). Residential Landscape Sustainability, United Kingdom, Black-well Publishing, p. 4.

Song S, Fang C, Li R, Gao A (2011). Residential Landscape, China, Liaoning Science&Technology Publishing Hause, p.