___

• 1. Giuseppe L, Gian Andrea P, Gino G, Alessandro F & Claudio M. Radiographic assessment of the mandibular retromolar canal using cone-beam computed tomography, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2013; 71:3-4, 650-655 2. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, et al. Bifid mandibular canal in Japanese. Implant Dent. 2007;16:24-32. 3. Claeys V, Wackens G. Bifid mandibular canal: literature review and case report. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005; Jan;34(1):55-8. 4. White SC, Pharoah MJ Oral Radiology—principles and interpretation, 5th edn. Mosby, St. Louis 2004 5. Rouas P, Delbos Y, Nancy J. Pseudo multipl and enlarged mandibular canals: the evidence-based response of come beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35:217–218 6. Benediktsdottir IS, Wenzel A, Petersen JK, Hintze H: Mandibular third molar removal: risk indicators for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 97: 438-446. 7. Wadhwani P, Mathur RM, Kohli M et al. Mandibular canal variant: a case report. J Oral Pathol Med 2008;37:122–124 8. Sanchis JM, Pen ̃arrocha M, Soler F. Bifid mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:422–4. 9. Nortje ́ CJ, Farman AG, Grotepass FW. Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg. 1977;15:55–63. 10. Langlais RP, Broadus R, Glass BJ. Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;110:923–6. 11. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:327–2. 12. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Ariji E. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:155-159.