Farklı Propolis Damlalarının Oral Patojenlere KarşıAntimikrobiyal Etkinliğinin Değerlendirilmesi: Bir İn Vitro Çalışma

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'de kolaylıkla bulunançeşitli propolis damlalarının iki oral patojene (Streptococcusmutans ve Enterococcus faecalis) karşı antimikrobiyaletkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya yedi farklı propolis damlası (1'den7'ye gruplar: Umay Herbal Organic Propolis, Bee'o Up [%15],Propoli EVSP, Brazilian Green Liquid Propolis, Eğriçayır Propolis,Bee'o Up [%30], Biostore Propolis) dahil edildi. Bakteriler 100 µl,her bir propolis örneği ise10 µl olacak şekilde yayma ekim tekniğiile Brain-Heart Infusion agar besiyerine ekildi. Petri kutuları bakteriüremesi için 24 saat inkübasyona bırakıldı ve sonuçta oluşan zonçapları ölçüldü. Her deney grubu fotoğraflandı. İstatistiksel analizMann Whitney-U testi kullanılarak yapıldı. Bulgular: Su bazlı propolis (Grup 1) iki oral patojene karşı dainhibisyon bölgesi oluşturamamıştır. Alkol bazlı propolislerden ise,yalnızca 4. ve 5. gruplar E. faecalis' e karşı etkinlikgösterememiştir. S. mutanslara karşı en yüksek antimikrobiyal etki5. grup'ta görülürken, aynı grup E. faecalis üzerinde herhangi biretki gösterememiştir. 6. grup, E. faecalis üzerinde diğer propolisdamlalarından anlamlı olarak daha etkili bulunmuştur (p

Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis Drops On Oral Pathogens: AnIn Vitro Study

Background: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate theantimicrobial effectiveness of various propolis drops found easilyin Turkey against two oral pathogens; Streptococcus mutans andEnterococcus faecalis. Methods: Seven different propolis drops (Group 1 to 7: UmayHerbal Organic Propolis, Bee'o Up [15%], Propoli EVSP, BrazilianGreen Liquid Propolis, Eğriçayır Propolis, Bee'o Up [30%],Biostore Propolis) were included in the study. Antimicrobial effectof drops was investigated by the agar plate diffusion method. Petridishes were prepared with Brain-Heart Infusion broth. 100 µl ofmicroorganisms and 10 µl of each propolis were planted to thesepetri dishes from a broth culture. Inhibition zones formed on the24th hour were measured in mm's and each experimental groupwas photographed. Data were compared by Mann Whitney-U test. Results: Only water-based propolis of the present study (Group1) formed no inhibition zone against both oral pathogens andalcohol-based groups 4 and 5 formed no zone only against thelatter. Group 5 showed significantly the highest antimicrobial effectagainst S. mutans, however that group showed no influence on E.faecalis. Group 6 was found significantly more effective on E.faecalis than other propolis drops (p

___

  • 1. Ardizzoni A, Pericolini E, Paulone S, Orsi CF, Castagnoli A, Oliva I, et al. In vitro effects of commercial mouthwashes on several virulence traits of Candida albicans, viridans streptococci and Enterococcus faecalis colonizing the oral cavity. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207262.
  • 2. Nobbs AH, Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF. Streptococcus adherence and colonization. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;73:407–50.
  • 3. Luca D, Passos M, Freires IA, Gala-García A, Santos VR, Vale MP, et al. The anti-caries activity and toxicity of an experimental propolis-containing varnish. Braz Oral Res, 2017;31:e45.
  • 4. Tazegül S, Koçak MM, Topuz Ö, Özcan S, Çekiç AA, Erten H. Üç Farklı Solüsyonun Streptococcus mutans ve Enterococcus faecalis Üzerine Antimikrobiyal Etkinliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. EÜ Diş Hek Fak Der. 2006;27:153-158.
  • 5. Ardizzoni A, Blasi E, Rimoldi C, Giardino L, Ambu E, Righi E, et al. An in vitro and ex vivo study on two antibiotic-based endodontic irrigants: a challenge to sodium hypochlorite. New Microbiol. 2009;32:57–66.
  • 6. Kouidhi B, Zmantar T, Mahdouani K, Hentati H, Bakhrouf A. Antibiotic resistance and adhesion properties of oral Enterococci associated to dental caries. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11(1):155.
  • 7. Rams TE, Feik D, Mortensen JE, Degener JE, van Winkelhoff AJ. Antibiotic susceptibility of periodontal Enterococcus faecalis. J Periodontol. 2013;84:1026–33.
  • 8. Anderson AC, Jonas D, Huber I, Karygianni L, Wölber J, Hellwig E et al. Enterococcus faecalis from Food, Clinical Specimens, and Oral Sites: Prevalence of Virulence Factors in Association with Biofilm Formation. Front Microbiol. 2016;6:1534.
  • 9. Savitha A, SriRekha A, Vijay R, Champa C, Jaykumar T. An in vivo comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of chitosan, chlorhexidine gluconate gel and their combination as an intracanal medicament against Enterococcus faecalis in failed endodontic cases using real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(3):360-366.
  • 10.FDI World Dental Federation. Oral health and noncommunicable diseases. [Internet]. Switzerland: World Dental Federation; 2011 [cited Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.fdiworlddental.org/what-wedo/advocacy/oral-health-and-noncommunicablediseases
  • 11.Freires IA, Alencar SM, Rosalen PL. A pharmacological perspective on the use of Brazilian Red Propolis and its isolated compounds against human diseases. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;110:267-79.
  • 12.Koo H, Gomes BPFA, Rosalen PL, Ambrosano GMB, Park YK, Cury JA. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis and Arnica montana against oral pathogens. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45(2):141-148.
  • 13.Nazeri R, Ghaiour M, Abbasi Sh. Evaluation of antibacterial effect of propolis and its application in mouthwash production. Front Dent. 2019;16(1):1- 12.
  • 14.Bueno-Silva B, Alencar SM, Koo H, Ikegaki M, Silva GV, Napimoga MH et al. Anti-Inflammatory and antimicrobial evaluation of neovestitol and vestitol isolated from Brazilian red propolis. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61(19):4546-50.
  • 15.Duarte S, Rosalen PL, Hayacibara MF, Cury JA, Bowen WH, Marquis RE, et al. The influence of a novel propolis on mutans streptococci biofilms and caries development in rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2006;51(1):15-22.
  • 16.Cardoso JG, Iorio NLP, Rodrigues LF, Couri MLB, Farah A, Maia LC, et al. Influence of a Brazilian wild green propolis on the enamel mineral loss and Streptococcus mutans' count in dental biofilm. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;65:77-81.
  • 17.Shekar BRC, Nagarajappa R, Suma S, Thakur R. Herbal extracts in oral health care-A review of the current scenario and its future needs. Pharmacogn Rev. 2015; 9(18): 87.
  • 18.Veloz JJ, Saavedra N, Lillo A, Alvear M, Barrientos L, Salazar LA. Antibiofilm activity of Chilean propolis on Streptococcus mutans is influenced by the year of collection. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:291351.
  • 19.Mostafa M, El-Bayoumy S, Magda EL, El-sayed S. Evaluation of The Antimicrobial Effect of Propolis Extract on Oral Microflora. Al-Azhar Dent J. 2019;3(2):135-40.
  • 20.Luengo JF, Ayala SJ, Carlos LEM, Toscano IG, Anaya MA. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Formocresol and Chloramphenicol, Tetracycline and Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Antibiotic Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: 24 month follow up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;43(1):16-21.
  • 21.Arslan S, Ozbilge H, Kaya EG, Er O. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis, BioPure MTAD, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. Saudi Med J. 2011;32(5):479-83.
  • 22.Agüero MB, Svetaz L, Baroni V, Lima B, Luna L, Zacchino S, et al. Urban propolis from San Juan province (Argentina): Ethnopharmacological uses and antifungal activity against Candida and dermatophytes. Ind Crops Prod. 2014;57:166-73.
  • 23.Airen B, Sarkar PA, Tomar U, Bishen KA. Antibacterial effect of propolis derived from tribal region on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2018;36(1):48.
  • 24.Jafarzadeh TSK, Kasra RK, Erfan M, Vahid Dastjerdi E, Rezaei Y, Tabatabaei FS, et al. Evaluating the in‑vitro antibacterial effect of Iranian propolis on oral microorganisms. Iran J Pharm Res. 2011;10:363‑8.
  • 25.Sardana D, InduShekar KR, Manchanda S, Saraf BG, Sheoran N. Role of propolis in dentistry: review of the literature. Focus Altern Complement Ther. 2013;18(3):118-125.
  • 26.Sawicka D, Car H, Borawska MH, Nikliński J. The anticancer activity of propolis. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2012;50(1):25-37.
  • 27.Vasconcelos WA, Braga NM, Chitarra VR, Santos VR, Andrade AL, Domingues RZ. Bioactive glassgreen and red propolis association: antimicrobial activity against oral pathogen bacteria. Nat Prod Chem Res. 2014;2(4):154.
  • 28.Gomes RT, Teixeira KIR, Cortés ME, Santos RV. Antimicrobial activity of a propolis adhesive formulation on different oral pathogens. Braz J Oral Sci. 2007;6(22):1387-91.
  • 29.Endo MM, Estrela CR, Alencar AHG, Silva JA, Decurcio DA, Estrela C. Antibacterial action of red and green propolis extract in infected root canal. Rev Odonto Ciênc. 2017;32(2):99-103.
  • 30.Kayaoglu G, Ömürlü H, Akca G, Gürel M, Gençay Ö, Sorkun K, et al. Antibacterial activity of Propolis versus conventional endodontic disinfectants against Enterococcus faecalis in infected dentinal tubules. J Endod. 2011;37(3):376-381.
Selcuk Dental Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-7529
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Selcuk Universitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS BİYOFİLM ELİMİNASYONUNUN ER:YAG MODALİTELERİNE (PIPS VE SWEEPS) GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Banu ARICIOĞLU, Fatma PERTEK HATİPOĞLU, Ömer HATİPOĞLU, İlkay BAHÇECİ

Pratisyen Diş Hekimi, Çene Cerrahı veya Endodontistin Koyduğu ve Çene Cerrahı ile Endodontistin Multidisipliner Olarak Koyduğu Apikal Cerrahi Endikasyonlarının Retrospektif Olarak İncelenmesi

F. Gülfeşan Yıldırım ÇANAKÇI, Burhan Can ÇANAKÇI

ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİNDEKİ KONİK IŞINLI BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİ (KIBT) İNCELEMESİ İSTEM NEDENLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Hande SAGLAM, Esra YESİLOVA, İbrahim Şevki BAYRAKDAR

Dişsiz Hastalar Için Ağız Sağlığı Etki Profilinin TürkçeVersiyonunun Psikometrik Özellikleri: Geçerlilik,Güvenilirlik Ve Görsel Analog Ölçek Ile Karşılaştırma

Ravza ERASLAN, Kerem KILIÇ, Gözde ERTÜRK ZARARSIZ, İkbal LEBLEBİCİOĞLU KURTULUŞ, Zeynep KARACALAR

Farklı Kanal İçi Ortamların Apeks Bulucuların DoğruluğuÜzerine Etkisi

Tuğrul ASLAN, Burak SAĞSEN, Asena OKUR

Amalgam Dolgulu Hastalarda ve Diş Hekimlerinde Plazma MikroRNA'lar ile Serum Civa Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişki

Makbule Tuğba TUNÇDEMİR, Mehmet Melih OMEZLİ

Sabit Protezlerde Altyapı Materyalleri Ve Sınıflandırmaları

Emine GÖNCÜ BAŞARAN, Hidayet ÇELİK, Ali İhsan ZENGİNGÜL, Hatice KOÇOĞLU

Does The Vehicle Type Affect the Persistence of Calcium Hydroxide When Removing with Sonic Activation?

Sevinç AKTEMUR TÜRKER, Fatma Zühal YURDAGÜL

Türk Pedodontistlerinin Tanı ve Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Gamze TOPÇUOĞLU, Mustafa AYDINBELGE

The effect of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles on microhardness and SEM-EDS analysis of glass ionomer cement and amalgomer

Özge KAM HEPDENİZ, Osman GÜRDAL