Ravza ERASLAN, Kerem KILIÇ, Gözde ERTÜRK ZARARSIZ, İkbal LEBLEBİCİOĞLU KURTULUŞ, Zeynep KARACALAR

Dişsiz Hastalar Için Ağız Sağlığı Etki Profilinin TürkçeVersiyonunun Psikometrik Özellikleri: Geçerlilik,Güvenilirlik Ve Görsel Analog Ölçek Ile Karşılaştırma

Amaç: OHIP-EDENT, Ağız Sağlığı Etki Profili aracınınkısaltılmış bir versiyonudur. Bu çalışmanın amacı,Türkiye'deki yaşlı nüfus için bu aracın Türkçe versiyonunu(OHIP-EDENT-TR) geliştirmek ve değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Tam protez kullanan 120 dişsiz hasta(72 erkek, 48 kadın; ort. Yaş 65.59 ± 7.61 yıl) çalışmayadahil edildi. Hastalar bu çalışma sırasında çevrilen OHIP EDENT-TR'yi ve bir görsel analog skalayı (100 mm) 3 ayarayla iki kez tamamladı. OHIP-EDENT-TR için özetpuanların iç tutarlılığını ölçmek için Cronbach alfa kullanıldı.OHIP-EDENT-TR ve alt ölçeklerinin özet puanlarının sınıflararası korelasyon katsayısı ve % 95 güven aralığı hesaplandı. Bulgular: En düşük ve en yüksek güvenilirlik sırasıyla 7.sorular (n = 120, α = 0.888) ve 2. sorular (α = 0.931) içinelde edildi. OHIP-EDENT-TR için özet puanların güvenilirliğiiyiydi (α = 0.903). OHIP-EDENT-TR ölçeği ile görsel analogölçek puanları arasında anlamlı bir ilişki vardı (p

Psychometric Properties of a Turkish Version of the Oral HealthImpact Profile for Edentulous Patients: Validity, Reliability and Comparison with A Visual Analogue Scale

Background: OHIP-EDENT is a shortened version of the Oral HealthImpact Profile instrument The purpose of this study was to developand evaluate the Turkish version of it (OHIP-EDENT-TR) for theelderly population in Turkey. Methods: A total of 120 edentulous patients (72 males, 48 females;mean age 65.59 ± 7.61 years) who had complete prostheses wereincluded in the study. The patients completed the OHIP-EDENT-TR,which was translated during this study, and a visual analogue scale(100 mm) twice at an interval of 3 months. Cronbach’s alpha wasused to measure the internal consistency of the summary scores forthe OHIP-EDENT-TR. The interclass correlation coefficient and 95%confidence interval of the summary scores for the OHIP-EDENT-TRand its subscales were calculated. Results: The lowest and highest reliabilities were obtained forquestions 7 (n = 120, α = 0.888) and 2 (α = 0.931), respectively. Thereliability of the summary scores for the OHIP-EDENT-TR was good(α = 0.903). There was a significant relationship between the OHIP EDENT-TR scale and visual analogue scale scores (p < 0.001).These values were indicative of fair-to-excellent convergent validity. Conclusion: The Turkish version of OHIP EDENT (OHIP-EDENT-TR)is a reliable, valid and applicable scale for evaluating oral healthrelated quality of life in the Turkish elderly patients.

PDF

___

1. Awad MA, Feine JS. Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:400-5.
2. Zani SR, Rivaldo EG, Frasca LC, Caye LF. Oral health impact profile and prosthetic condition in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implantsupported overdentures and fixed prostheses. J Oral Sci 2009;51:535-43.
3. Slade GD, Strauss RP, Atchison KA, Kressin NR, Locker D, Reisine ST. Conference summary: assessing oral health outcomes--measuring health status and quality of life. Community Dent Health 1998;15:3-7.
4. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a shortform oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:284-90.
5. Leon S, Correa-Beltran G, De Marchi RJ, Giacaman RA. Ultra-short version of the oral health impact profile in elderly Chileans. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017;17:277-85.
6. Sato Y, Kaiba Y, Yamaga E, Minakuchi S. Reliability and validity of a Japanese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous subjects. Gerodontology 2012;29:e1033-7.
7. Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing healthrelated quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:446-50.
8. Balci N, Alkan N, Gurgan CA. Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the oral health impact profile-14. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20:19- 24.
9. Souza RF, Patrocinio L, Pero AC, Marra J, Compagnoni MA. Reliability and validation of a Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for assessing edentulous subjects. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:821-6.
10.Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Crosscultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of clinical epidemiology 1993;46:1417-32.
11.Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186-91.
12.Moss S, Patel P, Prosser H, Goldberg D, Simpson N, Rowe S, et al. Psychiatric morbidity in older people with moderate and severe learning disability. I: Development and reliability of the patient interview (PAS-ADD). Br J Psychiatry 1993;163:471-80.
13.Shrestha B, Niraula SR, Parajuli PK, Suwal P, Singh RK. Reliability and Validity of a Nepalese Version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous Subjects. J Prosthodont 2018;27:416- 20.
14.He SL, Wang JH. Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous subjects. Qual Life Res 2015;24:1011-6.
15.Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34- 42.
16.Possebon A, Faot F, Machado RMM, Nascimento GG, Leite FRM. Exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis of the OHIP-Edent instrument. Braz Oral Res 2018;32:e111.