Does surface treatment with primers increase the shear bond strength between metallic bracket and monolithic zirconia?

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of surface treatment with different primers on the shear bond strength (SBS) between metallic brackets and monolithic zirconia crowns. Methods: Sixty-five monolithic zirconia molar crowns were fabricated with CAD-CAM technology. All crowns underwent thermal cycling. After aging, crowns were randomly divided into five groups (n = 13) according to cementation procedures: orthodontic bonding system; primer/composite paste: Transbond XT (TXT) (control); Group M: Monobond Plus (MP) was applied on crowns surfaces then TXT composite paste; Group MT: MP was applied on crown surface then primer/composite paste of TXT; Group Z: Z-Prime Plus (ZP) was applied on crown surface then TXT composite paste; Group ZT: ZP was applied on crown surface then primer/composite paste of TXT was used for bonding the metallic brackets. The bracket-bonded crowns were tested for SBS using a universal testing machine. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between all groups regarding SBS values (p=0.001). Group MT showed the highest SBS value, the control group showed the lowest SBS value (p<0.05). Conclusion: It can be concluded that all bracket-bonded crowns were sufficient to withstand orthodontic forces. Surface treatment with primers contributes to increase the shear bond strength between metallic bracket and monolithic zirconia.

Does Surface Treatment With Different Primers Increase The Shear Bond Strength Between Metallic Bracket and Monolithic Zirconia?

Background: This was aimed to investigate the effect of surface treatment with different primers on the shear bond strength (SBS) between metallic brackets and monolithic zirconia crowns.Methods: Sixty-five monolithic zirconia molar crowns were fabricated with CAD-CAM technology. All crowns underwent thermal cycling. After aging, crowns were randomly divided into five groups (n = 13) according to cementation procedures: orthodontic bonding system; primer/composite paste: Transbond XT (TXT) (control); Group M: Monobond Plus (MP) was applied on crowns surfaces then TXT composite paste; Group MT: MP was applied on crown surface then primer/composite paste of TXT; Group Z: Z-Prime Plus (ZP) was applied on crown surface then TXT composite paste; Group ZT: ZP was applied on crown surface then primer/composite paste of TXT was used for bonding the metallic brackets. The bracket-bonded crowns were tested for SBS using a universal testing machine. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance.Results: A statistically significant difference was found between all groups regarding SBS values (p=0.001). Group MT showed the highest SBS value, the control group showed the lowest SBS value (p<0.05).Conclusion: It can be concluded that all bracket-bonded crowns were sufficient to withstand orthodontic forces. Surface treatment with primers contributes to increase the shear bond strength between metallic bracket and monolithic zirconia.

___

  • 1. Kokich VG, Spear FM. Guidelines for managing the orthodontic-restorative patient. Semin Orthod. 1997;3(1):3-20.
  • 2. Özcan M, Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(1):7-26.
  • 3. Papia E, Larsson C, du Toit M, Vult von Steyern P. Bonding between oxide ceramics and adhesive cement systems: a systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(2):395-413.
  • 4. Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(4): 387-92.
  • 5. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003; 19(8):725-31.
  • 6. Bavbek NC, Roulet JF, Ozcan M. Evaluation of microshear bond strength of orthodontic resin cement to monolithic zirconium oxide as a function of surface conditioning method. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(5):473-80.
  • 7. Yi YA, Ahn JS, Park YJ, Jun SH, Lee IB, Cho BH, Son HH, Seo DG. The effect of sandblasting and different primers on shear bond strength between yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic and a self-adhesive resin cement. Oper Dent. 2015;40(1): 63-71.
  • 8. Ozcan M, Nijhuis H, Valandro LF. Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(1):99-104.
  • 9. Maeda FA, Bello-Silva MS, de Paula Eduardo C, Miranda Junior WG, Cesar PF. Association of different primers and resin cements for adhesive bonding to zirconia ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(3):261-65.
  • 10. Lee JY, Ahn J, An SI, Park JW. Comparison of bond strengths of ceramic brackets bonded to zirconia surfaces using different zirconia primers and a universal adhesive. Restor Dent Endod. 2018;43(1):e7.
  • 11. Ju GY, Oh S, Lim BS, Lee HS, Chung SH. Effect of Simplified Bonding on Shear Bond Strength between Ceramic Brackets and Dental Zirconia. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(10):1640.
  • 12. Schley JS, Heussen N, Reich S, Fischer J, Haselhuhn K, Wolfart S. Survival probability of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses up to 5 yr: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(5):443-50.
  • 13. Meyenberg KH, Lüthy H, Schärer P. Zirconia posts: a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent. 1995;7(2):73-80.
  • 14. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(4):383-88.
  • 15. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. Five-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based Denzir 3-unit FPDs. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(3):223-27.
  • 16. Jang GW, Kim HS, Choe HC, Son MK. Fracture Strength and Mechanism of Dental Ceramic Crown with Zirconia Thickness. Procedia Eng. 2011;10:1556- 60.
  • 17. Mehmeti B, Azizi B, Kelmendi J, Iljazi-Shahiqi D, Alar Ž, Anić-Milošević S. Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Zirconium Crowns. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2017; 51(2):99-105.
  • 18. Mehmeti B, Kelmendi J, Iiljazi-Shahiqi D, Azizi B, Jakovljevic S, Haliti F, Anić-Milošević S. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Crowns. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019;53(1):17-27.
  • 19. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(3):268-74.
  • 20. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95(6): 430-36.
  • 21. Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B. Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res. 2009;88(9):817-22.
  • 22. Kim J, Park C, Lee JS, Ahn J, Lee Y. The Effect of Various Types of Mechanical and Chemical Preconditioning on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets on Zirconia Restorations. Scanning. 2017;2017:6243179.
  • 23. Kim NH, Kim YJ, Lee DY. Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Metal Brackets to Tribochemically Silica-coated Zirconia Surfaces Using Different 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate-containing Primers. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(1):21-9.
  • 24. Wood DP, Jordan RE, Way DC, Galil KA. Bonding to porcelain and gold. Am J Orthod. 1986;89(3):194-205.
  • 25. Lee JH, Lee M, Kim KN, Hwang CJ. Resin bonding of metal brackets to glazed zirconia with a porcelain primer. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45(6):299-307.
  • 26. Yang B, Barloi A, Kern M. Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dent Mater. 2010;26(1):44-50.
  • 27. Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;71(2):381-86.
  • 28. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(4):356-62.
  • 29. Jung-Yun Ha, Jun Sik Son, Young Kyung Kim, Kyo-Han Kim, Tae-Yub Kwon. Effect of Heat Treatment of Dental Zirconia Ceramic Treated with Three Different Primers on the Bonding Durability of Resin Cement. Macromolecular Research. 2013;21(1):71-7.
  • 30. Magne P, Paranhos MP, Burnett LH Jr. New zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements. Dent Mater. 2010;26(4):345-52.
  • 31. Kwak JY, Jung HK, Choi IK, Kwon TY. Orthodontic bracket bonding to glazed full-contour zirconia. Restor Dent Endod. 2016;41(2):106-113.
  • 32. Ebert T, Elsner L, Hirschfelder U, Hanke S. Shear bond strength of brackets on restorative materials: Comparison on various dental restorative materials using the universal primer Monobond® Plus. J Orofac Orthop. 2016;77(2):73-84.
  • 33. Reynolds IR. A Review of Direct Orthodontic Bonding. British Journal of Orthodontics. 1975;2(3):17-18.
  • 34. Ryou DB, Park HS, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding. Angle Orthod. 2008 Nov;78(6):1105-09.
  • 35. Lowder PD, Foley T, Banting DW. Bond strength of 4 orthodontic adhesives used with a caries-protective resin sealant. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(2):291-95.
  • 36. Chen L, Suh BI, Brown D, Chen X. Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths. Am J Dent. 2012; 25(2): 103-08.
  • 37. Lorenzoni FC, Leme VP, Santos LA, de Oliveira PC, Martins LM, Bonfante G. Evaluation of chemical treatment on zirconia surface with two primer agents and an alkaline solution on bond strength. Oper Dent. 2012; 37(6):625-33.
  • 38. Koizumi H, Nakayama D, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. Bonding of resin-based luting cements to zirconia with and without the use of ceramic priming agents. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14(4):385-92.
  • 39. Cetik S, Ha TH, Sitri L, Duterme H, Pham V, Atash R. Comparison of Shear Strength of Metal and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets Cemented to Zirconia Depending on Surface Treatment: An In Vitro Study. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(2):150-55.
  • 40. Turker N, Buyukkaplan UŞ, Başar EK, Özarslan MM. The effects of different surface treatments on the shear bond strengths of two dual-cure resin cements to CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2020;12(4):189-96.
Selcuk Dental Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-7529
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Selcuk Universitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

COVİD-19’UN GÜNCEL BELİRTİLERİNİN LİTERATÜR DERLEMESİ

Büşra KARADURAN, Mine KORUYUCU

ANNE SÜTÜ VE DİŞ SAĞLIĞI

Hülya ÇERÇİ AKÇAY, Oya AKTÖREN

Türk Popülasyonunda 18 Yaş Eşiğinin Belirlenmesi için Londra Atlas Tekniği ve Cameriere’nin 3. Molar Olgunluk İndeksi’nin (I3M) Uygulanabilirliğinin Karşılaştırılması

Hacer Nida UĞUZ, Selin ÇELİK ÖGE

Bir Diş Hekimliği Fakültesine Başvuran Hastaların Sistemik Hastalıklarının İncelenmesi

Gülsün AKAY, Kahraman GÜNGÖR

Eğri kök kanallarının tedavi tekrarında farklı Ni-Ti döner alet yöntemlerinin transportasyon ve merkezde kalma etkinliklerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi

Elif ÇİFTÇİOĞLU, Enver Sedat KÜÇÜKAY

Ortodontik Tedavi Sonrası Ektopik Maksiller Kaninlerin Keratinize Dişeti Genişliğindeki Değişim

Hüseyin Egemen KILIÇ, Yasemin Bahar ACAR

Temporomandibular rahatsızlık alt grupları ve bruksizmin kulak çınlaması ile ilişkisinin incelenmesi

Burcu BAL, Gözde SARAK, Koray ORAL

Dudak Damak Yarıkları ile İlgili İnternete Dayalı Bilgi Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi

Ömer EKİCİ, Bünyamin ONGAN

ÇOCUK DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE GÜMÜŞ DİAMİN FLORÜR KULLANIMI

Zeynep UÇAR, Bahar Melis AKYILDIZ

Lateral Pencere Yöntemi Uygulanarak Gerçekleştirilen Maksiller Sinüs Yükseltme Prosedüründe Membran Kullanması Gerçekten Gerekli midir?

Hakan OCAK, Umut DEMETOĞLU, Burcu GÜRSOYTRAK, Halis Ali ÇOLPAK, Gülsün YILDIRIM