Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Protetik Diş Tedavisi Uzmanlığı Hakkındaki Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Bu çalışmanın amacı Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi’nde 2018/2019 akademik döneminde eğitim gören öğrencilerin Protetik Diş Tedavisi uzmanlığı hakkındaki görüşlerini değerlendirmektir. 22 sorudan oluşan bir anket 1-5. sınıfta eğitim gören 491 öğrenciye uygulandı. Anket soruları Protetik Diş Tedavisinin preklinik, klinik ve teorik eğitimine yönelik sorular ve bazı faktörlere göre diğer uzmanlık dallarına göre sıralama isteyen sorulardan oluşmaktadır. Verilerin istatistiksel analizinde deskriptif, frekans analizleri, crosstabs ve independent sample t testi kullanıldı. Protetik Diş Tedavisi uzmanlığı ile ilgili görüşlerin öğrencilerin yaş, cinsiyet, eğitim dönemine göre farklılık göstermediği görüldü (p>0.05). Protetik Diş Tedavisinin tüm faktörler eşliğinde değerlendirildiğinde tercih sırasının ortalama olarak 3.11 olduğu bulundu. Protetik Diş Tedavisi uzmanlığı ile ilgili düşüncelerin genel olarak olumlu ve tercih edilme durumunun iyi bir yerde olduğu sonucuna varıldı.

Evaluation Of The Wievs Of The Expertise In Prosthodontics, Of Students In The Faculty Of Dentistry, Atatürk University

The aim of this study is to evaluate the views of the students studying in the academic year of 2018/2019 at Atatürk University Faculty of Dentistry about their expertise in Prosthodontics. A questionnaire consisting of 22 questions was applied to 491 students in 1-5 class. The questionnaire questions consist of questions related to preclinical, clinical and theoretical training of Prosthodontics, and questions that require ranking according to some other specialties. Descriptive, frequency analysis, crosstabs and independent sample t test were used for statistical analysis. It was observed that the opinions about the expertise of Prosthodontics did not differ according to the age, gender and education period of the students (p>0.05). When the prosthetic dental treatment was evaluated with all factors, it was found that the order of preference was 3.11 on average. It is concluded that the positive and preferential status of the ideas about Prosthodontics are in a good place.

PDF

___

1. Wright RF, Dunlop RA, Kim FM, Douglass CW. A survey of program directors: trends, challenges, and mentoring in prosthodontics. Part 1. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists 2008:17(1):69-75.
2. Chmar JE, Weaver RG, Valachovic RW. Dental school vacant budgeted faculty positions, academic years 2005-06 and 2006-07. Journal of dental education 2008:72(3):370-85.
3. Basco WT, Jr., Reigart JR. When do medical students identify career-influencing physician role models? Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 2001:76(4):380-2.
4. Ambrozy DM, Irby DM, Bowen JL, Burack JH, Carline JD, Stritter FT. Role models' perceptions of themselves and their influence on students' specialty choices. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 1997:72(12):1119-21.
5. Jordan J, Brown JB, Russell G. Choosing family medicine. What influences medical students? Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien 2003:49:1131-7.
6. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2002:87(1):5-8.
7. Douglass CW, Watson AJ. Future needs for fixed and removable partial dentures in the United States. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2002:87(1):9-14.
8. Dhima M, Petropoulos VC, Han RK, Kinnunen T, Wright RF. Dental students' perceptions of dental specialties and factors influencing specialty and career choices. Journal of dental education 2012:76(5):562-73.
9. American Dental Association. 2001–02 survey of advanced dental education. Chicago: American Dental Association, 2002:34.
10. Cooper LF. Prosthodontics and the American College of Prosthodontists: a specialty's contribution to improving oral health care. J Am Coll Dent 2009:76(1):27-30.
11. Zarchy M, Kinnunen T, Chang BM, Wright RF. Increasing predoctoral dental students' motivations to specialize in prosthodontics. Journal of dental education 2011:75(9):1236-43.
12. Nash KD, Pfeifer DL. Private practice and the economic rate of return for residency training as a prosthodontist. Journal of the American Dental Association 2005:136(8):1154-62.
13. Nash KD, Pfeifer DL. Prosthodontics as a specialty private practice: net income of private practitioners. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists 2006:15(1):37-46.
14. Munoz DM, Kinnunen T, Chang BM, Wright RF. Ten-year survey of program directors: trends, challenges, and mentoring in prosthodontics. Part 1. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists 2011:20(7):587-92.