Elif YAZAN, Koray GENCAY, Elif Bahar TUNA

AŞI REDDİ VE TOPİKAL FLUORİD REDDİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Koruyucu tedaviler bireylerin hastalığa yakalanma riskini ve sonrasında ölüm riskini oldukça düşüren tedavilerdir. Aşının reddedilmesi bireysel olduğu kadar toplumsal birçok soruna yol açmaktadır. 2010 yılından sonra yetişkinler arasında görülen çocukluk çağı hastalıklarının sayısının artması, oluşan kızamık ve kabakulak salgınları çocukluk dönemi aşılarının önemini bir kez daha kanıtlar niteliktedir. Topikal fluorid uygulaması da ülkemizde endemik olarak görülen diş çürüklerinin önlenmesinde etkisi 1++ derecesinde kanıtlanmış koruyucu bir uygulamadır. Aşı ve topikal fluorid uygulamalarının reddedilme prevalansı, nedenleri ve bu redde karşın alınabilecek önlemlerin tespiti birey ve toplum sağlığı açısından önem taşımaktadır. Aşı reddi nedenlerini dini nedenler, felsefi nedenler, güvenlik endişeleri ve sağlık çalışanlarından daha fazla bilgi alma olarak sıralayabiliriz. Topikal fluorid reddi nedenlerini sorgulayan bir araştırma bulunmazken topikal fluorid reddi nedenlerini aşı reddi nedenleriyle ilişkilendiren araştırmalar mevcuttur. Anahtar kelimeler: Topikal fluorid, aşı reddi, koruyucu dişhekimliği

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Topikal fluorid, aşı reddi, koruyucu dişhekimliği

PDF

___

1- T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Temel Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Genişletilmiş Bağışıklama Programı Genelgesi. 2008; 1.
2- US Census Barreau State and county quick facts. American Academy of Pediatrics 2011: 1-10.
3-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Staff. Pertussis (Whooping Cough).doi: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/healthinfo/discond/pages/pertussis.aspx. Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2017.
4-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Staff. Measles Cases and Outbreaks.doi: http://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html. Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2017.
5- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Staff. Mumps Cases and Outbreaks.https://www.cdc.gov/mumps/outbreaks.html. Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2017.
6- Omer SB, Pan WK, Halsey NA, et al. Nonmedical exemptions to school immunization requirements: secular trends and association of state policies with pertussis incidence. JAMA 2006; 296: 1757–63.
7- Flanagan-Klygis EA, Sharp L, Frader JE. Dismissing the family who refuses vaccines: a study of pediatrician attitudes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; 159(10): 929–34.
8- Chen RT, Hibbs B. Vaccine safety: Current and future challenges. Pediatric Annals 1998; 27: 445–55.
9- The SAGE Vaccine Hesitancy Working Group. Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy-a systemic review. http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/3_SAGE_WG-Strategies_addressing_vaccine-hesitancy_2014. Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2017.
10- Dube E, Gagnon D, Nickels E, et al. Mappingvaccine hesitancy-country-specific characteristics of a global phenomenon. Vaccine 2014; 32(49): 6649-54. 11- Kennedy A, Basket M, Sheedy K. Vaccine attitudes, concerns, and information sources reported by parents of young children: results from the 2009 healthstyles survey. Pediatrics 2011; 127(Supplement 1): S92–9.
11- Kennedy A, Basket M, Sheedy K. Vaccine attitudes, concerns, and information sources reported by parents of young children: results from the 2009 healthstyles survey. Pediatrics 2011; 127(Supplement 1): S92–9.
12- Freed GL, Clark SJ, Butchart AT, et al. Sources and perceived credibility of vaccine-safety information for parents. Pediatrics 2011; 127(1): 107–12.
13- Wallace A. A Short History of Vaccine Panic. Wired Magazine. October 23, 2009 -accessed on March 31, 2012, at http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/10/a-short-historyof-vaccine-panic/. Erişim tarihi: 01.12.2017.
14- Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, Linnell J, Casson DM, Malik M, et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, nonspecific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet 1998; 351: 637–641.
15- Institute of Medicine. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004; 114(3): 1-10.
16- McKee C, Bohannon K. Exploring the reasons behind parental refusal of vaccine. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2016; 21(2): 104-9.
17- Fredrickson DD, Davis TC, Arnould CL, et al. Childhood immunization refusal: provider and parent perceptions. Fam Med 2004; 36(6): 431-9.
18- Black GV, McKay FS. Mottled teeth – an endemic developmental imperfection of the teeth heretofore unknown in the literature of dentistry. Dent Cosmos 1916; 58: 129–156.
19- Chi DL. Caregivers who refuse preventive care for their children: the relationshipbetween immunization and topical fluoride refusal. Am J Public Health 2014; 104(7): 1327–33.
20- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN).Dental interventions to prevent caries in children. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2014: 24-5.
21- Chi DL, Parent Refusal of Topical Fluoride for Their Children. Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Jul; 61(3): 607-617.
22- Venkateswarlu P. Evaluation of analytical methods for fluorine in biological and related materials. J Dent Res 1990 Feb; 69 Spec No:514-21: 556-7.
23- Whitford GM, Ekstrand J. Summary of Session I: Metabolism of fluoride. J Dent Res 1990; 69(2): 513.
24- Fejerskov O, Larsen MJ, Richards A, Baelum V. Dental tissue effects of fluoride. Adv Dent Res 1994; 8: 15-31.
25- Yen C, Hyde TB, Costa AJ, Fernandez K, Tam JS, Hugonnet S, Huvos AM, Duclos P, Dietz VJ, Burkholder BT. The development of global vaccine stockpiles. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2015; (15): 43-8.
26- Carton JR, Park A. Reviewof tohe 2006 United States National Research Council Report Fluoride in Drinking Water. Guest Editorial Rev Fluoride 2006; 39(3): 163-172.
27- Yu Y, Yang WX, Dong Z, Wan CW, Zhang JT, Liu JL, et al. Neurotransmitter and receptor changes in the brains of fetuses from areas of endemic fluorosis. Chinese Journal of Endemiology 1996; 15(5): 257-9.
28- Prival MJ. Fluorides and human health. Center for Science in the Public Interest, Washington D.C. 1972; 23-5.
29- Zakrzewska H, Udala J. In vitro influence of sodium fluoride on adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content in ram semen. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2006; 52 (Suppl 1): 109-11.
30- Johnson W, et al. Fluoridation and bone disease in renal patients. In: E Johansen, DR Taves, TO Olsen, Eds. Continuing Evaluation of the Use of Fluorides. AAAS Selected Symposium. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. 1979; 275-293.
31- Humphris GM, Zhou Y. Prediction of nursery school-aged children who refuse fluoride varnish administration in a community setting: a Childsmile investigation. Int J Paediatr Dent 2014; 24(4): 245–51.
32- Quinonez RB, Kranz AM, Lewis CW, et al. Oral health opinions and practices of pediatricians: updated results from a national survey. Acad Pediatr 2014; 14(6): 616–23.
33- Harris JE, Chan SW. The continuum-of-addiction: cigarette smoking in relation to price among Americans aged 15-29. Health Econ 1999; 8(1): 81–6.
34- Adams SH, Rowe CR, Gansky SA, et al. Caregiver acceptability and preferences for preventive dental treatments for young African-American children. J Public Health Dent 2012; 72(3): 252–60.
35-. Hendaus MA, Jama HA, Siddiqui FJ, et al. Parental preference for fluoride varnish: a new concept in a rapidly developing nation. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016; 10: 1227–33.
36- McNeil DR. America’s longest war: the fight over fluoridation, 1950–. Wilson Q 1985; 9(3): 140–53.
37- Armfield JM, Akers HF. Community water fluoridation support and opposition in Australia. Community Dent Health 2011; 28(1): 40–6.
38- Griffin M, Shickle D, Moran N. European citizens’ opinions on water fluoridation Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008; 36: 95-102.
39- Rada RE. Controversial issues in treating the dental patient with autism. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141(8): 947–53.
40- Capozza LE, Bimstein E. Preferences of parents of children with autism spectrum disorders concerning oral health and dental treatment. Pediatr Dent 2012; 34(7): 480-4.
41- Marinho VC, Worthington HV, Walsh T, et al. Fluoride varnishes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (7): CD002279.
42- Pavel M, Jimison H, Spring B. Behavioral informatics: dynamical models for measuring and assessing behaviors for precision interventions. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2016; 2016: 190-193.