LAPAROSKOPİK ve AÇIK YÖNTEM İLE KOLOREKTAL CERRAHİ YAPILAN HASTALARIN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Amaç Laparoskopik kolorektal cerrahi günümüzde birçok merkezde yaygın olarak kullanılan bir yöntem halini almıştır. Çalışmamızda laparoskopik ve açık kolorektal cerrahi uygulanan olgularda postoperatif klinik ve onkolojik sonuçların karşılaştırılması ve literatür ile kıyaslanması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi genel cerrahi kliniğinde Ocak 2012 ile Aralık 2018 tarihleri arasında kolorektal cerrahi uygulanan hastaların verileri retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Bulgular Çalışmamıza 438’i (%80,5) açık, 73’ü (%13,4) laparoskopik, 33’ü (%6,1) konversiyon ile rezeksiyon uygulanan toplam 544 hasta dahil edildi. Seride acil opere edilen vaka sayısı 158 (%29,0), elektif vaka sayısı 386’dır (%71,0). Toplam 156 (%28,7) postoperatif komplikasyon saptanmış olup, gruplara göre değerlendirildiğinde; laparoskopik cerrahi grubunda postoperatif komplikasyon 20 (%27,4), açık cerrahi grubunda 126 (%28,8), konversiyon grubunda 10 (%30,3) postoperatif komplikasyon saptanmıştır. Rektum kanserlerinde ortalama çıkarılan lenf nodu sayıları açık prosedürde 19,0±9,7, laparoskopik prosedürde 22,3±11,6’ dir (p:0,198). Laparoskopik ve açık cerrahi grubundaki rektum kanseri olgularında sırasıyla 1 (%2,3) ve 8 (%5,9) hastada pozitif çevresel cerrahi sınır saptanmıştır (p:0,456). Ortalama distal cerrahi sınır açık grupta 45,1±39,8, laparoskopik grupta 41,1±37,7 ’dir (p:0,608). Sonuç Laparoskopik kolorektal kanser cerrahisi klinik ve onkolojik sonuçlar yönünden açık prosedür ile karşılaştırılabilir sonuçlara sahiptir. Minimal invaziv cerrahinin bilinen birçok avantajı göz önüne alındığında laparoskopik cerrahi muhtemelen kolon kanseri için standart tedavi haline gelecektir.

COMPARISON OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN COLORECTAL SURGERY

Objective Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has become a widely used method in many centers today. In our study, it was aimed to compare the postoperative clinical and oncological results in patients who underwent laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery and to compare them with the literature. Material and Method The data of patients who underwent colorectal surgery between January 2012 and December 2018 at the Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital General Surgery clinic were analyzed retrospectively. Results A total of 544 patients were included in our study, of which 438 (80.5%) underwent open resection, 73 (13.4%) laparoscopic, 33 (6.1%) underwent resection with conversion. In the series, the number of cases that were operated urgently was 158 (29.0%), and the number of elective cases was 386 (71.0%). A total of 156 (28.7%) postoperative complications were detected. When evaluated according to the groups; There were 20 (27.4%) postoperative complications in the laparoscopic surgery group, 126 (28.8%) in the open surgery group, and 10 (30.3%) in the conversion group. The mean number of lymph nodes removed in rectal cancers is 19.0±9.7 in the open procedure and 22.3±11.6 in the laparoscopic procedure (p: 0.198). A positive circumferential surgical margin was found in 1 (2.3%) and 8 (5.9%) patients with rectal cancer in the laparoscopic and open surgery groups, respectively (p: 0.456). The mean distal surgical margin was 45.1±39.8 mm in the open group and 41.1±37.7 mm in the laparoscopic group (p: 0.608). Conclusion Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery has comparable clinical and oncological outcomes to the open procedure. Given the many known advantages of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic surgery will likely become the standard treatment for colon cancer.

___

  • 1. Xi Y, Xu P. Global colorectal cancer burden in 2020 and projections to 2040. Translational Oncology 2021;14(10):101174.
  • 2. van der Pas M, Haglind E, Cuesta M, Fürst A, Lacy A, Hop W et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2013;14(3):210-218.
  • 3.Kim W, Kim H, Han S, Kim M, Hyung W, Ryu S et al. Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer. Annals of Surgery 2016;263(1):28-35.
  • 4. Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Watanabe M et al. Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surgical Endoscopy 2012;27(5):1695-1705.
  • 5. McCombie A, Frizelle F, Bagshaw P, Frampton C, Hewett P, McMurrick P et al. The ALCCaS Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2018;61(10):1156-1162.
  • 6. Wu J, Birnbaum E, Fleshman J. Early experience with laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Surgical Endoscopy 1997;11(5):449-455.
  • 7. Wu W, Sun Y, Hua Y, Shen L. Laparoscopic versus conventional open resection of rectal carcinoma: A clinical comparative study. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2004;10(8):1167.
  • 8. Lujan J, Valero G, HernandezQ, Sanchez A, Frutos M D, Parrilla P. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009;96(9):982-989.
  • 9. Dural A, Keskin M, Balik E, Akici M, Kunduz E, Yamaner S et al. The Role of the Laparoscopy on Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Patients With Rectal Cancer. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2015;25(2):129-137.
  • 10.Green B, Marshall H, Collinson F, P Quirke, P Guillou, D G Jayne et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer British Journal of Surgery 2013;100(1):75-82.
  • 11. Stevenson A, Solomon M, Lumley J, Hewett P, Clouston A, Gebski V et al. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer. JAMA 2015;314(13):1356.
  • 12. Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent D, Boller A, George V, Abbas M et al. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes. JAMA 2015;314(13):1346.
  • 13. Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F et al. Short-Term Surgical Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic and Open D3 Dissection for Stage II/III Colon Cancer. Annals of Surgery 2014;260(1):23-30.
  • 14. Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gianotti L, Martani C et al. Metabolic and Functional Results After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2002;45(8):1070-1077.
  • 15. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2006;13(3):413-424.
  • 16. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WCJ, Jeekel J, Kazemier G. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology 2005;6(7):477-484.
  • 17. Tjandra J, Chan M. Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Disease 2006;8(5):375-388.
  • 18. COST study group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;350(20):2050–9.
  • 19. Deijen CL, Vasmel JE, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Cuesta MA, Coene P-PLO, Lange JF et al. Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer. Surgical Endoscopy 2017;31(6):2607–15.
  • 20. Draeger T, Völkel V, Gerken M, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Fürst A. Long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic versus open rectal cancer resection: a high-quality population-based analysis in a Southern German district. Surgical Endoscopy 2018;32(10):4096–104.
  • 21. Curet MJ, Putrakul K, Pitcher DE, Josloff RK, Zucker KA. Laparoscopically assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma Perioperative results and long-term outcome. Surgical Endoscopy 2000;14(11):1062–6.
  • 22. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. The Lancet 2002;359(9325):2224–9
  • 23. Leung KL, Meng WCS, Lee JFY, Thung KH, Lai PBS, Lau WY. Laparoscopic-assisted resection of right-sided colonic carcinoma: A case-control study. Journal of Surgical Oncology 1999;71(2):97–100.
  • 24. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Pique JM, Delgado S, Campo E, Bordas JM, et al. Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Surgical Endoscopy 1995;9(10).
  • 25. Leung KL, Yiu RYC, Lai PBS, Lee JFY, Thung KH, Lau WY. Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 1999;42(3):327–32.
  • 26. Kitano S, Inomata M, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S et al. Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. The lancet Gastroenterology & hepatology 2017;2(4):261-268.
  • 27. Jeong S-Y, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang S-B, Lim S-B, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Oncology 2014;15(7):767–74.
  • 28. Baik SH, Gincherman M, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Fleshman JW. Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Patients With Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Long-Term Survival. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2011;54(1):6–14.
  • 29. Kellokumpu IH, Kairaluoma MI, Nuorva KP, Kautiainen HJ, Jantunen IT. Short- and Long-term Outcome Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Carcinoma of the Rectum in the Multimodal Setting. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2012;55(8):854–63.
  • 30. Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2008;34(6):498–504.
  • 31. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2005;365(9472):1718–26.
  • 32. Stevenson ARL, Solomon MJ, Brown CSB, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD et al. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer. Annals of Surgery 2019;269(4):596–602.
SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7416
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

THİACLOPRİD’İN İNSAN LENFOSİTLERİNDE DNA HASARINA ETKİSİ

Vehbi Atahan TOĞAY, Dilek AŞCI ÇELİK

TEK TARAFLI SERVİKAL AĞRI VE RADİKÜLOPATİSİ OLAN HASTALARDA TRAPEZİUS, MASSETER VE STERNOKLEİDOMASTOİD KAS KALINLIKLARININ, AĞRI EŞİĞİNİN VE ÖZÜRLÜLÜĞÜN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Hüseyin Alper KIZILOĞLU, Veysel Atilla AYYILDIZ, Hatice YAKUT, Zülal BEKAR

LOMBER DİSK HERNİSİ TEDAVİSİNDE OZON TERAPİNİN ETKİNLİĞİ: 1098 HASTANIN SONUÇLARININ SİSTEMATİK DERLEMESİ

Z Işık SOLAK GÖRMÜŞ, Melda Pelin YARGIÇ, Murat Cenk ÇELEN

ADOLESAN BİREYLERDE İSKELETSEL VE DENTAL GELİŞİMİN OBEZİTE İLE İLİŞKİSİ

Mine GEÇGELEN, Mustafa UZUN

SOSYAL MOTİVASYON ANKETİ’NİN TÜRKÇEYE UYARLAMA ÇALIŞMASI

Görkem KIYAK, Sabriye ERCAN

MEME KANSERİ HASTALARINDA RADYOTERAPİ SIRASINDA DENETİMLİ BİREYSEL EGZERSİZ PROGRAMININ PSİKOLOJİK VE FİZİKSEL FAYDALARI: RANDOMİZE BİR ÇALIŞMA

Emine Elif ÖZKAN, Feray SOYUPEK, Zeynep TÜREN

KONJENİTAL DÜZELTİLMİŞ BÜYÜK ARTER TRANSPOZİSYONLU GEBEDE PERİKARDİYAL EFFÜZYON NEDENİ İLE ACİL SEZERYAN

Filiz ALKAYA, Zeliha DEDEBAĞI, Eyyüp Sabri ÖZDEN, Mustafa Soner ÖZCAN, Pakize KIRDEMİR

ADİPONEKTİN’İN MCF-7 PROLİFERASYONU VE GİRELİN SEVİYESİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Uğur ŞAHİN, Melda ŞAHİN, Okan SANCER, Mustafa CALAPOĞLU, Nurgül ŞENOL

FOURNİER GANGRENİ HASTALARINDA VAC KULLANIMININ HASTANE YATIŞ SÜRESİNE ETKİSİ

Fırat CANLIKARAKAYA, Serdar Gökay TERZİOĞLU, Felat AKINCI

İNTRAKRANİYAL KALSİFİKASYONLARIN BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİ BULGULARI

Murat BEYHAN, Sevgi YILMAZ, Muhammed Erkam ÇEKER, Erkan GÖKÇE, Osman DEMİR