GIDA KATKI MADDESİ OLARAK KULLANILAN SİTRİK ASİT, ASKORBİK ASİT VE SODYUM SİTRATIN İNSAN LENFOSİT HÜCRELERİNDE GENOTOKSİSİTESİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Amaç Gıda katkı maddelerinin kullanımı endüstriyel gelişmeyle birlikte sürekli artmaktadır. Bu çalışmada sık kullanılan sitrik asit, askorbik asit ve sodyum sitratın insan lenfosit hücrelerinde DNA üzerine olan etkilerinin comet metodu ile belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem Herhangi bir bilinen hastalığı ya da sürekli ilaç kullanımı olmayan, son 6 ayda radyolojik muayene geçirmemiş ve sigara içmeyen 18 – 45 yaş aralığında 4 erkek ve 4 kadın gönüllüden kan alınmış ve lenfositler izole edilerek 50, 150, 300 ve 600 μg/mL dozlarında sitrik asit, askorbik asit ve sodyum sitrat ile 1 s inkübasyona bırakılmıştır. Ardından comet metodu uygulanmış ve kuyruk DNA yüzdesi parametresi DNA hasarının göstergesi olarak Tek-yönlü Anova ile değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular Sodyum sitrat 300 ve 600 μg/mL dozlarında DNA hasarında kontrol grubuna kıyasla sınırlı artış görülmektedir. Bu artış istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir (p>0,05). Sitrik asit 600 μg/mL dozu ise kontrol grubuna kıyasla oldukça yüksek DNA hasarına sebep olmuştur (p<0,001). Aynı oranda doz uygulanan askorbik asit ve sodyum sitrat ile karşılaştırıldığında da yüksek DNA hasarına sebep olduğu görülmektedir (p<0,001). Diğer gruplarda DNA hasarında anlamlı bir değişiklik tespit edilememiştir (p>0,05). Sonuç Çalışma sonucunda, denenen dozlarda askorbik asitin herhangi bir DNA hasarına sebep olmadığı, sitrik asitin yüksek dozlarda DNA hasarına sebep olduğu ve sodyum sitratın ise yüksek dozlarda DNA hasarına sebep olabileceği tespit edilmiştir. Bazı katkı maddeleri her ne kadar antioksidan olarak sınıflandırılsa da, yüksek dozlarda DNA hasarına sebep olabilir. Dolayısı ile bu katkı maddelerini içeren gıdaların tüketiminde bilinçli ve kontrollü olunması gerekmektedir. Ancak kesin bir yargıya varmadan önce gıda katkı maddeleri ile ilgili daha detaylı çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

GENOTOXICITY EVALUATION OF CITRIC ACID, ASCORBIC ACID AND SODIUM CITRATE USED AS FOOD ADDITIVES IN HUMAN LYMPHOCYTES

Objective The use of food additives is constantly increasing with industrial development. In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of commonly used citric acid, ascorbic acid, and sodium citrate on DNA in human lymphocytes by the comet assay. Material and Method Blood samples were collected from 4 male and 4 female volunteers, aged 18 to 45 years, who had no known disease or continuous drug use, had not undergone radiological examination in the past 6 months, and were nonsmokers. Lymphocytes were isolated and incubated for 1 h with citric acid, ascorbic acid, and sodium citrate at doses of 50, 150, 300, and 600 μg/ mL. Subsequently, the Comet assay was applied and the tail DNA percentage was evaluated as evidence of DNA damage using One-way Anova. Results A limited increase in DNA damage was observed at sodium citrate doses of 300 and 600 μg/ml compared to the control group. This increase was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The dose of 600 μg/mL citric acid caused significantly higher DNA damage compared to the control group (p<0.001). Likewise, when compared to the same dose of ascorbic acid and sodium citrate, dose of 600 μg/mL citric acid caused significantly higher DNA damage (p<0.001). No significant change in DNA damage was observed in any other groups. Conclusion As a result, it was found that ascorbic acid did not cause DNA damage at all doses, citric acid caused DNA damage at high doses, and sodium citrate might cause DNA damage at high doses. Although some additives are classified as antioxidants, they may cause DNA damage at high doses. Therefore, it is necessary to be aware and controlled when consuming foods containing these additives. However, more detailed studies on food additives are needed before a definitive conclusion can be drawn.

___

  • 1. Carocho M, Barreiro MF, Morales P, Ferreira IC. Adding molecules to food, pros and cons: A review on synthetic and natural food additives. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety. 2014;13(4):377-99.
  • 2. Peycheva E, Alexandrova R, Miloshev G. Application of the yeast comet assay in testing of food additives for genotoxicity. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2014;59(1):510-7.
  • 3. Abd-Elhakim YM, Hashem MM, Anwar A, El-Metwally AE, Abo-El-Sooud K, Moustafa GG, et al. Effects of the food additives sodium acid pyrophosphate, sodium acetate, and citric acid on hemato-immunological pathological biomarkers in rats: Relation to PPAR-α, PPAR-γ and tnfα signaling pathway. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2018;62:98-106.
  • 4. Yılmaz S, Ünal F, Yüzbaşıoğlu D, Aksoy H. Clastogenic effects of food additive citric acid in human peripheral lymphocytes. Cytotechnology. 2008;56(2):137-44.
  • 5. Türkoğlu Ş. Genotoxicity of five food preservatives tested on root tips of Allium cepa L. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2007;626(1):4-14.
  • 6. Chen X, Lv Q, Liu Y, Deng W. Effects of the food additive, citric acid, on kidney cells of mice. Biotechnic & Histochemistry. 2015;90(1):38-44.
  • 7. Varvara M, Bozzo G, Celano G, Disanto C, Pagliarone CN, Celano GV. The use of ascorbic acid as a food additive: technical-legal issues. Italian journal of food safety. 2016;5(1).
  • 8. Sammel L, Claus J, Greaser M, Richards M. Investigation of mechanisms by which sodium citrate reduces the pink color defect in cooked ground turkey. Meat science. 2006;72(4):585-95.
  • 9. Lenzi LJ, Lucchesi PM, Medico L, Burgán J, Krüger A. Effect of the food additives sodium citrate and disodium phosphate on Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and production of stx-phages and Shiga toxin. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:992.
  • 10. Pandir D. DNA damage in human germ cell exposed to the some food additives in vitro. Cytotechnology. 2016;68(4):725-33.
  • 11. Demir E, Kocaoğlu S, Kaya B. Assessment of genotoxic effects of benzyl derivatives by the comet assay. Food and chemical toxicology. 2010;48(5):1239-42.
  • 12. Carocho M, Ferreira IC. A review on antioxidants, prooxidants and related controversy: Natural and synthetic compounds, screening and analysis methodologies and future perspectives. Food and chemical toxicology. 2013;51:15-25.
  • 13. Dosay-Akbulut M. Determination of DNA Damage Caused by Food Additives Using Comet Assay Method: Food Additives DNA damage via comet assay. Progress in Nutrition. 2021;22(4):e2020071.
  • 14. Raya SA, Aboul-Enein AM, El-Nikeety MM, Mohamed RS, Abdelwahid WM. In Vivo comet assay of food additives’ combinations and their effects on biochemical parameters in albino rats. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry. 2020;24:9170-83.
  • 15. Ali MY, Hassan GM, Hassan AMS, Mohamed ZA, Ramadan MF. In vivo genotoxicity assessment of sunset yellow and sodium benzoate in female rats. Drug and Chemical Toxicology. 2020;43(5):504-13.
  • 16. Shimada C, Kano K, Sasaki YF, Sato I, Tsudua S. Differential colon DNA damage induced by azo food additives between rats and mice. The Journal of toxicological sciences. 2010;35(4):547-54.
  • 17. Dorier M, Béal D, Marie-Desvergne C, Dubosson M, Barreau F, Houdeau E, et al. Continuous in vitro exposure of intestinal epithelial cells to E171 food additive causes oxidative stress, inducing oxidation of DNA bases but no endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nanotoxicology. 2017;11(6):751-61.
  • 18. Abo-EL-Sooud K, Hashem MM, Badr YA, Eleiwa MM, Gab-Allaha AQ, Abd-Elhakim YM, et al. Assessment of hepato-renal damage and genotoxicity induced by long-term exposure to five permitted food additives in rats. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25(26):26341-50.
  • 19. Mpountoukas P, Vantarakis A, Sivridis E, Lialiaris T. Cytogenetic study in cultured human lymphocytes treated with three commonly used preservatives. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2008;46(7):2390-3.
  • 20. Abd‐Elhakim YM, Anwar A, Hashem MM, Moustafa GG, Abo‐El‐Sooud K. Sodium acetate, sodium acid pyrophosphate, and citric acid impacts on isolated peripheral lymphocyte viability, proliferation, and DNA damage. Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology. 2018;32(8):e22171.
  • 21. Mamur S, Yüzbaşıoğlu D, Unal F, Aksoy H. Genotoxicity of food preservative sodium sorbate in human lymphocytes in vitro. Cytotechnology. 2012;64(5):553-62.
  • 22. Ataseven N, Yüzbaşıoğlu D, Keskin AÇ, Ünal F. Genotoxicity of monosodium glutamate. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2016;91:8-18.
  • 23. OECD. Test No. 489: In Vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2016.
  • 24. Gyori BM, Venkatachalam G, Thiagarajan P, Hsu D, Clement M-V. OpenComet: an automated tool for comet assay image analysis. Redox biology. 2014;2:457-65.
  • 25. IBMCorp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.; 2011.
  • 26. Lerda D, Biaggi Bistoni M, Peralta N, Ychari S, Vazquez M, Bosio G. Fumonisins in foods from Cordoba (Argentina), presence and genotoxicity. Food and chemical toxicology: an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association. 2005;43(5):691-8.
  • 27. Yilmaz S, Ünal F, Yüzbaşıoğlu D, Celik M. DNA damage in human lymphocytes exposed to four food additives in vitro. Toxicology and Industrial Health. 2014;30(10):926-37.
  • 28. Mamur S, Yüzbaşıoğlu D, Ünal F, Yılmaz S. Does potassium sorbate induce genotoxic or mutagenic effects in lymphocytes? Toxicology in vitro. 2010;24(3):790-4.
  • 29. Zengin N, Yüzbaşıoğlu D, Ünal F, Yılmaz S, Aksoy H. The evaluation of the genotoxicity of two food preservatives: Sodium benzoate and potassium benzoate. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2011;49(4):763-9.
  • 30. Kaya FF, Topaktaş M. Genotoxic effects of potassium bromate on human peripheral lymphocytes in vitro. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2007;626(1-2):48-52.
SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7416
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TİROİD İNCE İĞNE ASPİRASYONLARINDA İNCELENEN PREPARAT SAYISI İLE TANI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Ayça TAN, Aydın İŞİSAĞ

PLANTAR FASİİTTE TOPUK FAT PAD ELASTİKİYETİNİN VE KALINLIĞININ ULTRASON İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Ahmet Çağdaş BİÇEN, Utku Mahir YILDIRIM, Meric UNAL

ERKEN CUMHURİYET DÖNEMİ TÜRKİYE’SİNDE FUTBOL YARALANMALARI: GAZETE KUPÜRLERİNİN BETİMSEL İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Ahmet Said UYAN, Ramazan Kürşat ERDAŞ, Aydan ÖRSÇELİK, Görkem KIYAK, Sabriye ERCAN, Fuat İNCE

COVİD-19 PANDEMİSİNDE BİR ÜNİVERSİTE HASTANESİ CERRAHİ ONKOLOJİ KLİNİĞİNDE KANSER CERRAHİSİ DENEYİMİ

İsmail ZİHNİ, Mustafa TERCAN, Muhammed Selim BODUR, Mümtaz ERAKIN, İsa KARACA, Girayhan ÇELİK, İsa SÖZEN, Mehmet SABUNCUOGLU, Recep ÇETİN

BİPOLAR BOZUKLUK TANILI OLGULARDA HASTALIK ALGISININ KLİNİK ÖZELLİKLER, BAŞ ETME VE ÖZYETERLİLİK İLE İLİŞKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Gülin ÖZDAMAR ÜNAL, Gizem Çağla AKTAŞ, Gökçe İŞCAN, İnci ATAY

URSODEOKSİKOLİK ASİTİN SİROLİMUS UYGULANAN YAĞ DOKUSU KÖKENLİ MEZENKİMAL KÖK HÜCRELER ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Esra ARISU NAGHAVI, Bakiye GOKER BAGCA, Senem TEKELİ, Gürkan YİĞİTTÜRK, Burak GÖKÇE, Canberk TOMRUK, Türker ÇAVUŞOĞLU, Çığır AVCI, Cumhur GÜNDÜZ, Yiğit UYANIKGİL

10-20 MM ALT POL BÖBREK TAŞLARININ TEDAVİSİNDE RETROGRAD İNTRARENAL CERRAHİYE KARŞI MİNİ PERKÜTAN NEFROLİTOTOMİ: EĞİLİM SKORU EŞLEŞTİRMELİ BİR ANALİZ

Ahmet GUZEL, Hakan ANIL, Ali YILDIZ, Kaan KARAMIK, Serkan AKDEMİR, Taylan OKSAY, Murat ARSLAN

ŞİZOFRENİ HASTALARINDA YAPILANDIRILMIŞ EGZERSİZ PROGRAMININ YAŞAM VE UYKU KALİTESİNE ETKİSİ

Tuba KORKMAZ ASLAN, Mine EKİNCİ

ÇOCUKLUK ÇAĞI BAŞ AĞRILARI: NÖROGÖRÜNTÜLEMENİN TANIYA KATKISI VAR MI?

Müjgan ARSLAN

SAĞLIK ÇALIŞANLARININ COVID-19 PANDEMİSİ DÖNEMİNDE UYKU KALİTESİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI

Yücel KURT, Mustafa SAYGIN